Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest BlueBoyRamses_E1b1a

WE (K)NEED 1st ROUND TALENT ON OUR O LINE. period

106 posts in this topic

After reading this statement I no longer have any desire to ever say anything to you again. Wow...just...wow.

Do me a favor and stick to that. Sorry if I don't suffer fools lightly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol

Hutchinson didn't either, so I don't see why it's such a ludicrous idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today again prove choir boy O Line can't win you superbowl. Both QBs were untouched leaving the playmakers to make play and flourish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the 14th pick you need a playmaker, a game changer. Sorry, but a Guard does not fit that criteria.

A ballhawking DB. A dominant DT. Those are game changers. Hell, even a WR is better than taking a Guard.

The only O-linmen you take at 14 is a LT, and we really don't need to waste that pick this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take good tackle play at RT as rook then move Bell to RG. Second year move to LT and release gross

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope that if they take a o linemen in the first they follow with a wr, or if they go dt they go safety in the second. either build the offense up or build the defense up don't try and do both i hope they go all offense in the first two rounds, unless a dt that can't be passed up falls to us, our defense isn't the greatest but it's good enough now to allow us to outscore opponents kinda like the patriots and saints d during there Superbowl runs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Of course, he's so massive he has his own gravitational pull. 
    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      18,243
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    GSO Goat
    Joined