Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Cleveland violated league tampering rules?

43 posts in this topic

Posted

Lets rape those fools!!!

(of picks)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Are you guys sure we can get a pick from Cleveland if this is true? Isn't DA a Free Agent? Is the article saying since it it not free agency yet, DA is still "technically" apart of the team?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Are you guys sure we can get a pick from Cleveland if this is true? Isn't DA a Free Agent? Is the article saying since it it not free agency yet, DA is still "technically" apart of the team?

Tampering sometimes results in the forfeiture of picks.

That said, proving that Cleveland tampered here is probably a pipe dream.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The Browns 2013, 2014, 2015 1st rounders seem fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The Browns 2013, 2014, 2015 1st rounders seem fair.

A pick for each TD that Anderson threw in the Preseason games!

Is that more than one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I hope Gettleman and Co at least contact league office and put a stop to future moves by Chud. He left after interviewing with permission of Panthers, taking Scott Turner, taking the number one candidate to replace him in Norv Turner, and then Cleveland turns us down to interview the Special Teams coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

lol i hope this is true.

wouldn't be a bit surprised for chud to not know this is a big no- no. they've got no GM and it appears that they've told him he can do what he wants with personnel. they may have forgotten to ask him that one kind of important question, "do you know the rules?"

i guess when you have to settle on your 11th choice you're willing to let a couple things slide.

That's an interesting point. Chud has never worked on the personnel side, and right now he's got free reign to do as he pleases, so it wouldn't surprise me if he did contact DA and there are breadcrumbs to prove it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Make all the crappy comments you want, but have any of you seen the list of FA QBs? Which one of them would you rather have over DA? Batch, Carr, Moore, etc?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Charlie Batch actually has a pretty good record as a backup. He's getting up there, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Charlie Batch actually has a pretty good record as a backup. He's getting up there, though.

the same Charlie Batch that looked like teh Jimmy against the Browns?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

the same Charlie Batch that looked like teh Jimmy against the Browns?

He's won a fair number of games in relief over the past few years with the Steelers.

But yeah, he's up in age and probably on the downside.

Still not a bad choice for a team with a fairly durable QB though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Part of the reason for having DA around for Cam was the veteran experience. It was much more than having another capable arm in the waiting, but also to have someone who's been around the league for awhile and knew the offense.

It's going to be Cam's 3rd year...while having a veteran behind him would be ideal, it's not necessary anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites