Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Cleveland violated league tampering rules?


  • Please log in to reply
42 replies to this topic

#31 fieryprophet

fieryprophet

    WARNING: Do not annoy!

  • Joined: 15-December 08
  • posts: 5,421
  • Reputation: 5,668
  • LocationLa Grange, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:34 PM

lol i hope this is true.

wouldn't be a bit surprised for chud to not know this is a big no- no. they've got no GM and it appears that they've told him he can do what he wants with personnel. they may have forgotten to ask him that one kind of important question, "do you know the rules?"

i guess when you have to settle on your 11th choice you're willing to let a couple things slide.


That's an interesting point. Chud has never worked on the personnel side, and right now he's got free reign to do as he pleases, so it wouldn't surprise me if he did contact DA and there are breadcrumbs to prove it.

#32 Anybodyhome

Anybodyhome

    USN Retired

  • Joined: 07-July 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,515
  • Reputation: 2,431
  • LocationWherever I May Roam
HUDDLER

Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:36 PM

Make all the crappy comments you want, but have any of you seen the list of FA QBs? Which one of them would you rather have over DA? Batch, Carr, Moore, etc?

#33 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,810
  • Reputation: 13,353
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:39 PM

Charlie Batch actually has a pretty good record as a backup. He's getting up there, though.

#34 MtnJax

MtnJax

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-August 11
  • posts: 1,370
  • Reputation: 642
SUPPORTER

Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:43 PM

Charlie Batch actually has a pretty good record as a backup. He's getting up there, though.


the same Charlie Batch that looked like teh Jimmy against the Browns?

#35 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,810
  • Reputation: 13,353
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:48 PM

the same Charlie Batch that looked like teh Jimmy against the Browns?


He's won a fair number of games in relief over the past few years with the Steelers.

But yeah, he's up in age and probably on the downside.

Still not a bad choice for a team with a fairly durable QB though.

#36 Salvo

Salvo

    BEWB

  • Joined: 19-August 10
  • posts: 956
  • Reputation: 772
  • LocationColorado
SUPPORTER

Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:56 PM

Part of the reason for having DA around for Cam was the veteran experience. It was much more than having another capable arm in the waiting, but also to have someone who's been around the league for awhile and knew the offense.

It's going to be Cam's 3rd year...while having a veteran behind him would be ideal, it's not necessary anymore.

#37 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,705
  • Reputation: 4,445
  • LocationILM
Administrators

Posted 14 January 2013 - 12:58 PM

CLE has already used their 2 this year when they got Gordon in the Supplemental. FWIW, the Bears only got a 5th in the Lance Briggs tampering a few years back.



Pick is a Pick :)

#38 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:02 PM

Pick is a Pick :)

yeah, i'm not picky about a pick.

#39 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,810
  • Reputation: 13,353
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:07 PM

I'd be picky but don't want to be a prick.

#40 beastson52

beastson52

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 22-March 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 335
  • Reputation: 142
  • LocationEl Paso Tx
HUDDLER

Posted 14 January 2013 - 01:42 PM

Did Chud leave on bad terms with the Panthers? It seems he's throwing some big "efff u's " towards Rivera!


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users