Perhaps the Panthers should go around and collect money from all of the places since they benefited from them being here. Let me ask you...how much money do you think goes into restaurants on a home playoff game, what about hotels, what about other businesses?
If the majority of the people live here I would say a helluva lot less than you think. But lets tax them anyways.
As an example:
A study the same year conducted by the University of Minnesota showed an economic impact of about $9.1 million per Vikings game, based on calculations that 25,000 people from outside the metro area attended each game and spent an average of $230. That money then rippled through the local economy.
http://articles.balt...s-and-amusementAnother states:
The most recent swipe at how much Browns games pump into the local economy was in late 2007 by Positively Cleveland, the region's tourism promoter.
The estimate: $63 million.
http://www.cleveland...c_impact_c.htmlThose two articles also discuss how non-organizational jobs are affected by the teams being in town, as well...
Of course, as with anything, there are detractors that claim there are no economic benefits to having a sports team hosted within your city...
However, if accurate and the team generates an average of (let's say for number's sake) $7 million in local revenue from outside sources (more modest than what they claim the Vikings earn per home game), at a rate of 8 home games per year, for 17 years (we'll leave out Bowl games, playoffs, preseason and any non-football related revenue such as the DNC)...
7 million x 8 games = $56 x 17 years = $952 million in total return on the initial $60 million investment...
A profit of nearly $900 million... Conservatively...