Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Panthers want 125 Million in taxpayer money.


  • Please log in to reply
283 replies to this topic

#71 Rubi

Rubi

    Squid Smasher

  • Joined: 28-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,376
  • Reputation: 751
  • LocationCharlotte
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 08:51 AM

You guys really care about a tax that could be like $.01 on some purchase item like food or whatever ...

Plenty of other cities paid for new stadiums.

#72 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 17,911
  • Reputation: 6,257
  • LocationMatthews, NC
Administrators

Posted 15 January 2013 - 08:59 AM

Infrastructure


window dressing

#73 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • Joined: 10-January 11
  • posts: 16,928
  • Reputation: 8,866
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 08:59 AM

Why do we the residents of Mecklenburg. County get to pay for it when our name is the Carolina Panthers?

I'm not saying I'm for it or against it..but if our name encompasses 2 entire states..why does one county get stuck paying for it?


Again, although it is the city of Charlotte paying the bill, it will probably come out of a hotel tax so that people from outside of Charlotte are actually providing the revenue. And although they are called the Carolina Panthers, Charlotte gets the economic benefits of having the team in their town.

#74 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 09
  • posts: 8,185
  • Reputation: 6,118
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:02 AM

anyone know the total planned cost for the renovations, $125 million is only part, not all.

#75 Mrs Pantherfan

Mrs Pantherfan

    Lusting on Zod

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,793
  • Reputation: 420
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:04 AM

Again, although it is the city of Charlotte paying the bill, it will probably come out of a hotel tax so that people from outside of Charlotte are actually providing the revenue. And although they are called the Carolina Panthers, Charlotte gets the economic benefits of having the team in their town.



ok..that makes sense...I'm genuinely wondering..I'm not trying to start a debate or a fight...

oh...and will beers be $12 now instead of $10?? :)

#76 Inimicus

Inimicus

    Life is better in a kayak

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 6,423
  • Reputation: 1,212
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:05 AM

Why do we the residents of Mecklenburg. County get to pay for it when our name is the Carolina Panthers?

I'm not saying I'm for it or against it..but if our name encompasses 2 entire states..why does one county get stuck paying for it?



Because the team brings no real economic benefit to Greensboro, Wilmington, Greenville(either one) , Charleston, or any other town in the majority of the two state area.

#77 CarolinaCoolin

CarolinaCoolin

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 05-December 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,996
  • Reputation: 1,122
  • LocationMaryland
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:06 AM

Give him the money. I don't want to see us move to LA it's minimal to what is coming in the future now that we have cam.

#78 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 17,911
  • Reputation: 6,257
  • LocationMatthews, NC
Administrators

Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:09 AM

Again, although it is the city of Charlotte paying the bill, it will probably come out of a hotel tax so that people from outside of Charlotte are actually providing the revenue. And although they are called the Carolina Panthers, Charlotte gets the economic benefits of having the team in their town.

Because the team brings no real economic benefit to Greensboro, Wilmington, Greenville(either one) , Charleston, or any other town in the majority of the two state area.


http://news.illinois...17stadiums.html

“The net economic impact of professional sports in Washington, D.C., and the 36 other cities that hosted professional sports teams over nearly 30 years, was a reduction in real per capita income over the entire metropolitan area,” Humphreys and Coates noted in the report.

The researchers found other patterns consistent with the presence of pro sports teams. Among them:

• a statistically significant negative impact on the retail and services sectors of the local economy, including an average net loss of 1,924 jobs;

• an increase in wages in the hotels and other lodgings sector (about $10 per worker year), but a reduction in wages in bars and restaurants (about $162 per worker per year).
Those employed in the amusements and recreation sector appeared, at first glance, to benefit significantly from the presence of a pro team, with an average annual salary increase of $490 per worker, Humphreys said. However, he added, “this sector includes the professional athletes whose annual salaries certainly raise the average salary in this sector by an enormous amount.

As it turns out, those workers most closely connected with the sports environment who were not professional athletes saw little improvement in their earnings as a result of the local professional sports environment.”

Humphreys, who plans to present data from the report at a Nov. 29 hearing in Washington, D.C., said it is fairly common for city officials – blinded by bright visions of dollar signs – to pose as cheerleaders for projects aimed at attracting pro teams.



#79 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,711
  • Reputation: 2,351
Moderators

Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:15 AM

Thanks Jase. That was next.

Buncha crooks.

#80 Panthro

Panthro

    aka Pablo

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 24,876
  • Reputation: 5,782
Moderators

Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:16 AM

ffs I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Are you all serious about giving a billionaire $125M to improve his private business?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users