Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

First Impressions: Dave Gettleman


  • Please log in to reply
136 replies to this topic

#11 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,810
  • Reputation: 13,353
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:18 PM

I certainly hope he works to bolster the line but don't see how he will influence anything regarding the style of play unless he fires the current staff and hires his own. Maybe I misunderstood...


He said his duty is "to make everyone better" and specifically talked about working to make Rivera better.

That, plus one of his primary jobs with the Giants was to scout other teams, pinpoint their strengths and weaknesses and contribute to the planning for how to beat them.

So yeah, I think he'll affect the play on the field.

Specifically, he and his staff are going to scout opponents, look at what kind of players/roster we need to beat those opponents, and act accordingly.

#12 Scrumtrilescent

Scrumtrilescent

    I aim to misbehave.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 8,757
  • Reputation: 2,788
Administrators

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:18 PM

Double Windsors are for closers?

#13 Frosty06306

Frosty06306

    NOT NEWB

  • Joined: 20-November 12
  • posts: 52
  • Reputation: 5
ROOKIE

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:18 PM

He wants an OC who runs a balanced O and protects the quarterback. I can get behind Cam not taking the most hits at QB every year.

#14 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,705
  • Reputation: 4,445
  • LocationILM
Administrators

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:21 PM

Sounds like Hurney2.0

#15 PantherBrew

PantherBrew

    Educated White Trash

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 6,237
  • Reputation: 1,074
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:23 PM

Sounds like Hurney2.0


Hurney's logic is sound.

He just overreacted to our own FA's.

#16 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,810
  • Reputation: 13,353
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:23 PM

Sounds like Hurney2.0


You must've watched a different video than I did.

#17 Floppin

Floppin

    Smooches

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,885
  • Reputation: 3,405
  • LocationShallotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:25 PM

Sounds like Hurney2.0


Yeah, you know, with the addition of 25 years of scouting background and widely viewed as one of the best talent evaluators in the league. He also, as he said himself, isn't a fan of paying contracts outside of positional value - ie huge contracts for sentimental reasons.

But, by all means, continue on with your Eyeore parade.

Hurney did some things right and, very likely, would have had certain similar ideologies with every GM in the league. You're never going to get a compete 180% shift on any hire.

#18 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,945
  • Reputation: 18,373
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:27 PM

Sounds like Hurney2.0


as long as he doesn't massively over-pay guys and doesn't make armanti-esque draft maneuvers I think he'll work out well.

#19 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,810
  • Reputation: 13,353
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:27 PM

One important factor to me: He stated that the evaluation and roster decision process has to be "unemotional" and "not sentimental".

Welcome words.

#20 LiQuiD

LiQuiD

    Plumb Crazy

  • Joined: 21-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,261
  • Reputation: 51
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 12:30 PM

Personnel can be a crapshoot no matter what. One thing we do have complete control over is how much we pay underperforming players. Glad to hear Gettleman plans to write contracts with his head and not his heart.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users