Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Remember the head ref from the Raiders game..


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#11 catfang

catfang

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,791
  • Reputation: 1,464
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 01:47 PM

They'll make it.


Falcons wont be there.
I will repeat this message at 2:47PM, EST.

#12 Cary Kollins

Cary Kollins

    tengo baking soda

  • Joined: 07-November 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,207
  • Reputation: 8,166
  • LocationWinston-Salem, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 01:49 PM

Ladies and gentlemen? I give you UNIONS.


Wtf does this have to do with unions?

#13 tiger7_88

tiger7_88

    old skool SWAG

  • Joined: 12-May 11
  • posts: 5,743
  • Reputation: 2,482
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:51 PM

Wtf does this have to do with unions?


Unions, as socialist organizations are prone to do, will always demand equal treatment of their members without regard to quality, production, or output.

You think it was the NFL's idea alone to place one of the worst refs in the league as the referee in the SuperBowl?

#14 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    DeAngelo Williams/Steve Smith Huddle: Est 2003

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 11,641
  • Reputation: 5,038
  • LocationChapel Hill
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:53 PM

You think it was the NFL's idea alone to place one of the worst refs in the league as the referee in the SuperBowl?


seeing as to how the NFL uses an in house evaluation system and places the highest scoring refs in the super bowl according to their own criteria, yes

#15 Brooklyn Bully

Brooklyn Bully

    Sell it, Jerry

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,892
  • Reputation: 1,525
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:55 PM

Ya'll mad.

#16 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,818
  • Reputation: 4,796
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:55 PM

Add in Garth DeFelice to pitch hissy fits and/or tackle players in the field of play and you've got yourself a Super Bowl to remember.

#17 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 16,818
  • Reputation: 4,796
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:57 PM

Unions, as socialist organizations are prone to do, will always demand equal treatment of their members without regard to quality, production, or output.

You think it was the NFL's idea alone to place one of the worst refs in the league as the referee in the SuperBowl?

When you're done making a fool of yourself you should research how it works.

#18 Lilsmitty09

Lilsmitty09

    Actually....LilKB14

  • Joined: 07-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,083
  • Reputation: 2,336
  • LocationWashington State
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 02:58 PM

Falcons wont be there.
I will repeat this message at 2:47PM, EST.


Better get a time traveling machine

#19 I Mean He Was Found Guilty

I Mean He Was Found Guilty

    DeAngelo Williams/Steve Smith Huddle: Est 2003

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 11,641
  • Reputation: 5,038
  • LocationChapel Hill
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:00 PM

When you're done making a fool of yourself you should research how it works.


let's talk some more about how the same NFL that stood pat in the face of across the board disapproval earlier in the season to prove a point to the union is now so frightened of said union that it's supposedly being forced by it to place one of the "worst officials in the game" in their biggest event of the year.

#20 tiger7_88

tiger7_88

    old skool SWAG

  • Joined: 12-May 11
  • posts: 5,743
  • Reputation: 2,482
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:26 PM

Y'all keep on pretending the refs union doesn't have any say-so in the placement of officials.

Or input into the grading system.

Cotton candy clouds and lollipop trees are REAL!


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users