Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Here's an interesting article on homosexuality and biblical scholarship

203 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

this is still a focal point of debate for the united states, and, with religious grounding being the primary cause, it's important for non-religious and fundamentalist religious people alike to read this article. there's a lot of excellent points worth considering (and many of them point to some much deeper questions about biblical scholarship and literalist interpretations, but that's another thread for another time.

excerpt:

Proposition 1: Strictly speaking, the New Testament says nothing at all about homosexuality.

There is not a single Greek word or phrase in the entire New Testament that should be translated into English as “homosexual” or “homosexuality.” In fact, the very notion of “homosexuality”—like that of “heterosexuality,” “bisexuality,” and even “sexual orientation”—is essentially a modern concept that would simply have been unintelligible to the New Testament writers. The word “homosexuality” came into use only in the latter part of the nineteenth century, and, as New Testament scholar Victor Paul Furnish notes, it and related terms “presume an understanding of human sexuality that was possible only with the advent of modern psychological and sociological analysis.” In other words, “The ancient writers . . . were operating without the vaguest conception of what we have learned to call ‘sexual orientation’.”1 (In the rest of this article I shall use the terms “homosexual” and “homosexuality” strictly for the sake of convenience.)

it's a good read and not terribly long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Ban guns but allow same sex marriage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

No time to read this morning, but at that time there may have been no specific word to describe it...or if it were...just omitted. Romans speaks on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Ban guns but allow same sex marriage.

Lol because one has to do with the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Ban guns but allow same sex marriage.

you win this round of "post the most unintelligible argument imaginable"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Effeminate is used in the New testatment.

I Challenge you to show me an effeminate man and prove he is not gay. There are of cousre 2 types of gay men the effeminate ones and the more manly ones...... See what I did there... yeah Effeminate is in the new testament.

Dont' confuse with meek with effeminate. Jesus was meek.

I'm pretty sure I've read this before

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Effeminate is used in the New testatment.

I Challenge you to show me an effeminate man and prove he is not gay. There are of cousre 2 types of gay men the effeminate ones and the more manly ones...... See what I did there... yeah Effeminate is in the new testament.

Dont' confuse with meek with effeminate. Jesus was meek.

prince is "effeminate" but gets more pussy than you get hot meals

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Good article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

it's worth noting that the bible condemns "fornicators" with the same zeal but you don't see quite the same rancor over that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Effeminate is used in the New testatment.

I Challenge you to show me an effeminate man and prove he is not gay. There are of cousre 2 types of gay men the effeminate ones and the more manly ones...... See what I did there... yeah Effeminate is in the new testament.

Dont' confuse with meek with effeminate. Jesus was meek.

I'm pretty sure I've read this before

By brother in law is effeminate but most assuredly not gay, a fellow I work with is likewise a bit on the lilty side but once again not gay. In my younger days I was very active in both school and community theater and at that time could have introduced you to a dozen men who fit that description.

That's no less an ignorant statement than any other racist stereotype.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Agree with Inmicus... a man's "masculinity" or appearance thereof has no effect whatsoever on their sexuality.

I've known guys who were very effiminate that were straight and I've known guys who were very masculine and were gay.

Silly.

Don't stereotype Tb

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I Challenge you to show me an effeminate man and prove he is not gay. There are of cousre 2 types of gay men the effeminate ones and the more manly ones...... See what I did there...

is this the only thing you could find disagreeable about the article?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites