Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

PhillyB

Here's an interesting article on homosexuality and biblical scholarship

203 posts in this topic

Yes because it would mean he's justifying himself before God. I'm assuming this person knows who God is and experienced Him in some way. It all goes back to knowing, because that is what God is going to judge us by. Not everyone knows of God or experienced His goodness.

Let me say it another way. If God was staring you in the face, the one who knows everything and sees everything, and He told you homosexuality is off the standard of where He created us, what knowledge would you have to tell God He's wrong?

but the bible makes it clear that owning another person is an asshole thing to do, and you just said that all former slave owners aren't necessarily going to hell. isn't this a double standard?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but the bible makes it clear that owning another person is an asshole thing to do, and you just said that all former slave owners aren't necessarily going to hell. isn't this a double standard?

I said God judge us based on what we know. There are children who commit crime, but because they didn't know it was a crime, they aren't judged like an adult who was fully aware. God will judge us based on what we know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said God judge us based on what we know. There are children who commit crime, but because they didn't know it was a crime, they aren't judged like an adult who was fully aware. God will judge us based on what we know.

well i just asked if a gay man who doesn't know being gay is wrong is going to hell and you said yes. are you changing your answer?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well i just asked if a gay man who doesn't know being gay is wrong is going to hell and you said yes. are you changing your answer?

Nope, you said if he doesn't "think" there's nothing wrong with it. There's a difference. I got from that he's been told, and he knows what God has said concerning it. Yet he doesn't see anything wrong with it, he is now justifying himself. He knows God says it's not how He created us, yet the man accepts it because he can find nothing wrong with it. It's like a criminal finding nothing wrong with his crime. He is still judged for it because he knows the law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, you said if he doesn't "think" there's nothing wrong with it. There's a difference. I got from that he's been told, and he knows what God has said concerning it. Yet he doesn't see anything wrong with it, he is now justifying himself. He knows God says it's not how He created us, yet the man accepts it because he can find nothing wrong with it. It's like a criminal finding nothing wrong with his crime. He is still judged for it because he knows the law.

you only "know" that homosexuality is wrong because you think that biblical literalism is the correct (and only) way to interpret the scriptures. a gay man may very well "not know" that homosexuality is wrong because he doesn't "know" that mosaic cosmogonies are "correct."

the dynamic you're describing here is cripplingly simplistic and ignores the complexity of interpretive analysis and its epistemological effects. it also happens to be the reason establishment christianity is dying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you only "know" that homosexuality is wrong because you think that biblical literalism is the correct (and only) way to interpret the scriptures. a gay man may very well "not know" that homosexuality is wrong because he doesn't "know" that mosaic cosmogonies are "correct."

the dynamic you're describing here is cripplingly simplistic and ignores the complexity of interpretive analysis and its epistemological effects. it also happens to be the reason establishment christianity is dying.

Jesus said if the people would have believed Moses, they would have believed Him, because Moses wrote about Him. That was a clear indication that the things Moses wrote about, meaning the first five books attributed to Moses, literally happened. Now those who are saying it shouldn't be interpreted literally, are the same ones who have a hard time understanding why Jesus came. That is the reason why the establishment of Christianity is dying. Of course, for over a thousand years the teachings of Christ have been muddled by man's traditions. It's only in this day where His teachings are getting back to where it was in the time He taught them. That is why literalism have come back strong during the mid 20th century.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus said if the people would have believed Moses, they would have believed Him, because Moses wrote about Him. That was a clear indication that the things Moses wrote about, meaning the first five books attributed to Moses, literally happened. Now those who are saying it shouldn't be interpreted literally, are the same ones who have a hard time understanding why Jesus came. That is the reason why the establishment of Christianity is dying. Of course, for over a thousand years the teachings of Christ have been muddled by man's traditions. It's only in this day where His teachings are getting back to where it was in the time He taught them. That is why literalism have come back strong during the mid 20th century.

so wait are you arguing for full biblical literalism and the return of ruling legalities determined by mosaic cosmogonies? and if so, how do you intend to factor man's interpretation of what literal means?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ps you ignored all my actual questions and i'm 90% sure you don't know what mosaic cosmogony is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so wait are you arguing for full biblical literalism and the return of ruling legalities determined by mosaic cosmogonies? and if so, how do you intend to factor man's interpretation of what literal means?

This comes down to the Biblical version of Occam's Razor. If God is true and the Bible is His account, it's much more simple to take Genesis at face value. Saying all of it is nothing but poetry or anything else, kills all credit the Bible has to say on anything.

What do you mean when you say a return to the legalities of the mosaic cosmogonies? (And no I don't know what that phrase "mosaic cosmogonies" mean) Also, I've answered your questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so how are you on the internet without hands and eyes?

So if your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one of your body parts than to have your whole body thrown into hell. Matthew 5:29

And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away from you. It is better for you to lose one of your body parts than to have your whole body go into hell." Matthew 5:30

You're just another hypocrite that picks and chooses what passages to follow. The same way you probably eat pork, shellfish, and other unclean foods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites