Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Here's an interesting article on homosexuality and biblical scholarship


  • Please log in to reply
202 replies to this topic

#136 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,393 posts

Posted 19 January 2013 - 12:01 PM

did anyone honestly read any of page 9 because I sure as hell didn't

I know when I see a wall of text by a young earth creationist, i just dive right in.

#137 PhillyB

PhillyB

    hug it chug it football

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,774 posts
  • LocationGreensboro

Posted 19 January 2013 - 12:39 PM

it must be nice to be able to make up stuff like "their DNA was divine and slowly got worse over time" to explain gaps in your theories

#138 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,291 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 19 January 2013 - 01:59 PM

"go ask Alice....when she's 10 feet tall"

#139 mav1234

mav1234

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,391 posts

Posted 19 January 2013 - 03:55 PM

My comment of "populations within themselves" is a little misleading, by it I mean a man and a woman in those days had multiple children because their days were long on the earth. So let's do some math here. Say Adam and Eve had 100 children. (50 sons and 50 daughters). In essence Adam and Eve represents in this case 100 people, and that was part of my angle about them being small populations within themselves. Now let's say those hundred children paired up (50 pairs), and each pair produced another hundred. Now you have 5,102 people on the earth. This is just using a hundred children as a base. I would probably say that Adam had more than one hundred, and so forth.

The other part about my statement concerning Adam and Eve being populations within themselves, and this gets tricky and of course I have no evidence for it, is they were specially created as the first human beings. Common descent says that everything we are was passed down through our ancestors, going back to the first microbe life. Yet if God created us, and we evolved from Adam, God created all the information within Adam because he had no ancestor. Also we know Adam was created to live forever, so his DNA was godlike. Even after the fall, that DNA slowly began to decline. After the flood judgement, it rapidly declined to where now people are only living 70 to 80 years on average. If we had relations with very close relatives, the children won't survive after the second or third generation. So many will ask me what godlike DNA like, and what evidence suggests the things I'm saying? Well, I'm still studying these things out. Einstein didn't come up with his theories in a day did he, nor did the experimentation came about to help prove his theories the next day? It involved years of work, and his work was built upon generations of scientific study before him. (Not that I'm comparing myself to Einstein, just saying) I will say I'm coming along and along.


The other possibility is that your creation story is just a story... which would mean you wouldn't have to jump through logical hoops that don't make a whole lot of sense. I'm not trying to be as insulting as that comes out; I respect your attempts to rationalize Biblical literalism, but I think that it is just as likely and plausible that your creation stories were recorded by fallible men and thus the stories themselves are fallible, so literalism may not be the best idea because even if something akin to Genesis was how the "earth was created", it seems unlikely Genesis would be a reliable source to explore that given it's creation by fallibility.

Anyway...

What mechanism do you propose that would lead to "DNA decline"? How are you defining "DNA decline"? Are you talking about loss of variation due to natural selection? This would require allelic variation that is impossible from a single individual, unless you are proposing Adam had multiple copies of a gene and only passed on one particular copy to each offspring. Why do you suppose that "DNA decline" is what lead to shorter lifespans? What about DNA caused that? Do you have any evidence to support that?

#140 Matthias

Matthias

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,240 posts

Posted 19 January 2013 - 05:46 PM

Kral I forgot to answer your last question of me about the language of Genesis concerning the beginning of time, and how it relates to the age of the earth. We can say that before time was created (days), God created the earth and space. At that time the earth was formless, and space was empty. It wasn't until God spoke light into existence, and the seperation of light from the darkness, did the first day occur. What was this "light" God spoke? I believe it has something to do with time itself, and the introduction of this light was the beginning of time.

With all that said, God formed the earth and formed everything in the universe within a week. We know this from His statement of the Sabbath rest law. After that it's just adding up the years from Adam to Jesus, and finally adding on modern times to get an approximate age.

The other possibility is that your creation story is just a story... which would mean you wouldn't have to jump through logical hoops that don't make a whole lot of sense. I'm not trying to be as insulting as that comes out; I respect your attempts to rationalize Biblical literalism, but I think that it is just as likely and plausible that your creation stories were recorded by fallible men and thus the stories themselves are fallible, so literalism may not be the best idea because even if something akin to Genesis was how the "earth was created", it seems unlikely Genesis would be a reliable source to explore that given it's creation by fallibility.

Anyway...

What mechanism do you propose that would lead to "DNA decline"? How are you defining "DNA decline"? Are you talking about loss of variation due to natural selection? This would require allelic variation that is impossible from a single individual, unless you are proposing Adam had multiple copies of a gene and only passed on one particular copy to each offspring. Why do you suppose that "DNA decline" is what lead to shorter lifespans? What about DNA caused that? Do you have any evidence to support that?


I have good reason to believe it's not just a story. Which is why I'm studying these things out. I look at the world around me, and see many things that add up if the story were true. I also see consistency throughout the Bible concerning God, which is amazing considering the many men who wrote concerning Him. So it's because of those things, I have reason to believe there is more to the Genesis account than is let on.

So what is my mechanism for DNA decline? That is getting into the technical side and as I said I'm still studying those things. Would you look at DNA today and say it's "declining" in any way? We certainly know with each generation, more and more mutations happen. Yet that change is pretty stable, and it's stable everywhere you turn. As I said before, there may not be any physical evidence of the perfect world around today, because everything is corrupt.

Of course with all that said, I'm sure I could find something about our DNA that could suggest something to my hypothesizing, but I probably couldn't prove anything with it. I would need Adam's perfect genome to compare to our current genome to prove a "decline". Also, enviroment also contributed to our shorter lifespans. So I'll continue to research this.

Perhaps the better question you all can ask me is why do I feel there is something to the Bible that suggests it could be true.

#141 mav1234

mav1234

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,391 posts

Posted 19 January 2013 - 05:53 PM

More and more mutations happen? Are you arguing mutation rate is increasing? Or just mutations are accumulating? There is a significant difference in that. You sound like you think mutations are bad - which, of course, might be the case if you assume that there was ever perfection. But there's nothing to support there was perfection but a book, whose account of the origin of life is not supported by any evidence from science.

You may want to look into the evidence of common descent of all primates. I know you will likely conclude that we just can't understand why God would have made them all so similar or put retroviruses in our genome, but eh... maybe you'll realize that perhaps Genesis doesn't need to be interpreted literally for your faith to stand.

I really don't care why you think the Bible must be interpreted literally, and i'm not trying to be offensive there... I just don't. I'm more interested in hearing your hypotheses and the like.

#142 Kral

Kral

    Internet Legend

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,828 posts

Posted 19 January 2013 - 06:01 PM

Kral I forgot to answer your last question of me about the language of Genesis concerning the beginning of time, and how it relates to the age of the earth. We can say that before time was created (days), God created the earth and space. At that time the earth was formless, and space was empty. It wasn't until God spoke light into existence, and the seperation of light from the darkness, did the first day occur. What was this "light" God spoke? I believe it has something to do with time itself, and the introduction of this light was the beginning of time.

With all that said, God formed the earth and formed everything in the universe within a week. We know this from His statement of the Sabbath rest law. After that it's just adding up the years from Adam to Jesus, and finally adding on modern times to get an approximate age.


Just so you know I'll address this another day. I haven't forgotten.

#143 Matthias

Matthias

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,240 posts

Posted 19 January 2013 - 06:07 PM

More and more mutations happen? Are you arguing mutation rate is increasing? Or just mutations are accumulating? There is a significant difference in that. You sound like you think mutations are bad - which, of course, might be the case if you assume that there was ever perfection. But there's nothing to support there was perfection but a book, whose account of the origin of life is not supported by any evidence from science.

You may want to look into the evidence of common descent of all primates. I know you will likely conclude that we just can't understand why God would have made them all so similar or put retroviruses in our genome, but eh... maybe you'll realize that perhaps Genesis doesn't need to be interpreted literally for your faith to stand.

I really don't care why you think the Bible must be interpreted literally, and i'm not trying to be offensive there... I just don't. I'm more interested in hearing your hypotheses and the like.


My hyothsesis isn't complete yet. You've repeated what I've said concerning my limitations in proving things like DNA decline. (I would need an example of a perfect genome to compare ours) Yet that is the limit of science. I'm talking on information about the very beginning of earth and the universe. Science is a current day, observational study. From what we can see and observe today, we speculate on what likely took place in the past. However the limit is our observation. To put it on an astronomical level, we speculate that 4% of the universe is made up of matter. The other 96% we don't know what it is. That is just based on our current day observation. This doesn't count the stuff that was once observable, and now no longer.

My viewpoint takes this into account. Once I have a full hypothesis, I can begin experimenting with it.

#144 TANTRIC-NINJA

TANTRIC-NINJA

    The holy ghost of Mr. Miyagi

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,577 posts
  • LocationColumbia, South Kacky

Posted 19 January 2013 - 08:02 PM

It's my dream to study out the book of Genesis, and truly experiment to prove the account true or false.


I can save you some time on this..

#145 PhillyB

PhillyB

    hug it chug it football

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,774 posts
  • LocationGreensboro

Posted 19 January 2013 - 08:18 PM

considering your data for experimenting on genesis would come almost entirely from archaeology and geology you're not very likely to come across the answer you're looking for

#146 TANTRIC-NINJA

TANTRIC-NINJA

    The holy ghost of Mr. Miyagi

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,577 posts
  • LocationColumbia, South Kacky

Posted 19 January 2013 - 08:33 PM

considering your data for experimenting on genesis would come almost entirely from archaeology and geology you're not very likely to come across the answer you're looking for


Well that and far reaching theories to conveniently bridge the giagantic holes in the book do not help dispel the cave dwelling farmers who created this folklore.

How did new races result out of two original created humans..easy they both possesed the DNA of all races...and lived to 9000..

Why dont we live past 80 now? Sin in the DNA ..And Dinosaur bones are made of Satans toejam..

#147 SmootsDaddy89

SmootsDaddy89

    Just Say No To Boo

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,970 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:00 AM

Posted Image

#148 Porn Shop Clerk

Porn Shop Clerk

    Honky

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,426 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:12 AM

this one time i was candyflipping on geltabs and rolls and the bible totally made sense for like an hour

but it totally killed my buzz

#149 cookinwithgas

cookinwithgas

    Grey Poupon Elitest Trash

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,793 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:36 AM

Effeminate is used in the New testatment.


I Challenge you to show me an effeminate man and prove he is not gay. There are of cousre 2 types of gay men the effeminate ones and the more manly ones...... See what I did there... yeah Effeminate is in the new testament.

Dont' confuse with meek with effeminate. Jesus was meek.


I'm pretty sure I've read this before


Another big "screw you" to...you

When I was in High School I sang in the choir and did a little acting for fun - singing was serious for me, I made All State because I worked my ass off. I was surrounded all day by girls, it was fantastic....but of course all the jocks called me "gay", even though I also was in Civil Air Patrol, the hiking club, partied with the best of them...looks like you are one of those people at this point so yeah, sentence one above.

#150 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,936 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 06:44 PM

Well if you believe this guy's story we are all just a stroke away from being gay

http://www.dailymail...=feeds-newsxml/

Rugby player who 'woke up gay' after stroke and now has fiance says he’s the happiest he’s ever been

When 19-stone rugby player Chris Birch suffered a stroke during a freak accident, his life was transformed - but not in a way that anyone could have predicted.

When he regained consciousness, the 26-year-old – who was engaged to his girlfriend at the time – found his sexuality had completely altered.

'The Chris I knew had gone and a new Chris sort of came along. I came to the realisation that the stroke had turned me gay,' he said.

He is now the subject of a BBC3 documentary, chronicling his attempt over the past few months to make sense of his new identity.

Chris had been attempting a forward roll down a hill in 2011 when the blood supply to his brain was cut off causing a stroke.

During a stroke the areas starved of oxygen, brain cells die and this can cause damage. However, the brain can make new neural connections and find different pathways to achieve the same thing.

Some scientists believe it is possible that during this recovery process a patient could discover a new skill, accent or even a new sexuality. However, personality changes following a stroke are rare and there have been no documented cases of a stroke changing a person's sexuality.

But Mr Birch, for one, is convinced. Within a year of his stroke he had quit his job at a bank and become a hairdresser, moved out of his family home in the Welsh valleys and started meeting men.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.