Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

DCK Mock Draft


  • Please log in to reply
94 replies to this topic

#16 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,051 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:21 PM

I think Logan is more of an UT right? We need a run stuffer.

Edit: yea just looked him up. Logan's 290. He might be a solid player, but at least Geathers is of the mold we need.

2nd edit: dumbass iPad posting double posted

#17 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed Moncrief 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,289 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:21 PM

Who's better? Bennie Logan or Geathers.

depends on what position as Logan is more suited to play the 3 tech while Geathers is more of a NT/1 tech.

#18 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed Moncrief 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,289 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:23 PM

I think Logan is more of an UT right? We need a run stuffer.

Edit: yea just looked him up. Logan's 290. He might be a solid player, but at least Geathers is of the mold we need.

yes he is a 3 tech.i think he is a decent prospect as well.

#19 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,051 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:24 PM

huge difference with Amini who played D2 football and Frederick who played at Wisconsin.everybody knows that UW produces OL and this guy has been apart of the program for 3+ years. has started at 2 different postions,tough, smart and has good size. plus if something does happened to Kalil you got a nice back up center to fill his spot. i would like any WR in the 2nd with OL or DT in the first but what seperates Allen from Hunter, Patterson, and Rogers is being consistent and no off field issues. Nuk is a baller and i would love to have him too.


I didn't mean to imply they're similar players, just comparing how they're relative unknowns without much hype or talk of going that high. At least not yet...

#20 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed Moncrief 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,289 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:30 PM

I didn't mean to imply they're similar players, just comparing how they're relative unknowns without much hype or talk of going that high. At least not yet...

unknown to some, but from everything i read is he just as good if not better prospect as Peter Konz was coming out last year. they both started at OG before switching to C and leaving for the NFL.

#21 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,535 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:32 PM

I think Logan is more of an UT right? We need a run stuffer.

Edit: yea just looked him up. Logan's 290. He might be a solid player, but at least Geathers is of the mold we need.

2nd edit: dumbass iPad posting double posted


yea, thats what I thought also.

"Quick off the snap and capable of handling double-teams due to his strength and use of leverage, Logan is a load in the middle and a big reason as to why LSU ranked fifth in the
country last year in run defense." - cbssports

off that analysis, does it mean that Logan can stuff the run?

#22 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,051 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:34 PM

It sounds like it, but I'd have to question his ability to stuff the run in the NFL at 290. If his technique is just that good and he can put on about 20 lbs I'd be all for bringing him in.

#23 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,051 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:35 PM

Here's what ESPN has to say:

"Defensive Tackle Specific Traits
Versus the Run 2 Not a massive space eater. Will fight hard vs. double team but rarely is able to hold ground or split. Lacks lead in trunk. Will never be a good two-gap defender in NFL. However, he fires out low, has excellent initial leverage and shows good overall strength for size. Tough to move one-on-one. Good initial pop. Can disengage quickly. Does a great job of keeping eyes up and locating the football. Good overall awareness. Has great range versus the run. Closes quickly for his size and is an explosive tackler. Man handles ball carriers on a consistent basis."



#24 FattyFatFat

FattyFatFat

    Buddhist Monk

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,350 posts
  • LocationMint Hill

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:37 PM

would you rather have the 4th or 5th rated OL or the 1st rated WR?


4th or 5th rated OL.

#25 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,051 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:39 PM

4th or 5th rated OL.


I'd rather have the #1 WR than 4th or 5th OL. But if Warmack is there I'd rather have the #1 OG than WR or if Star is the only DT taken so far I'd rather have the #2 DT.

#26 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,491 posts
  • LocationSouthern California

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:40 PM

what dont you guys like about a guy who has produced with inconsistent QB play for 3 years in a row?on top of being the only true threat at WR so teams rolled coverages and game planned around stopping him.


Injuries, nagging injuries. Do not want my first pick to have an injury history.

Allen is a solid receiver but I do not want anything to do with him. I am sick of having injury prone guys on this team and Allen would just be another one.

#27 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,535 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:43 PM

It sounds like it, but I'd have to question his ability to stuff the run in the NFL at 290. If his technique is just that good and he can put on about 20 lbs I'd be all for bringing him in.


Im sure Logan can add 15-20 more pounds in the next level.
Im not saying Logan is anything like Ratliff, but Ratliff is only 303lbs and been a NT on a 34 D for a very long time.

#28 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,051 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:45 PM

Another thing about Allen, if he truly is the obvious #1 WR when the draft rolls around the Dolphins would be absolute fools to not take him. I can't remember another team with nearly as bad a WR corps as the Dolphins in my 20+ years of watching football.

#29 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,535 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:46 PM

4th or 5th rated OL.



well based on cbssports.com, Im guessing you're taking some guy named Hugh Thornton from Illinois over Keenan Allen?

#30 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,535 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:47 PM

Another thing about Allen, if he truly is the obvious #1 WR when the draft rolls around the Dolphins would be absolute fools to not take him. I can't remember another team with nearly as bad a WR corps as the Dolphins in my 20+ years of watching football.


Dolphins may take the FA route for a Jennings or Bowe with the kind of cap they have.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.