DCK Mock Draft
#31
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:47 PM
#32
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:48 PM
Dolphins may take the FA route for a Jennings or Bowe with the kind of cap they have.
Yea it's possible...but if I were the Dolphins I'd still spend my first pick on one. It's not like either of those guys are world beaters and they need a young guy to grow with Tannehill.
#33
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:49 PM
Always right, they no everything, no questions, hands down the best, always fugging right.
CBS and Walterfootball should be GMs, they are god, they know so much more than every human being alive.
#34
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:50 PM
Im sure Logan can add 15-20 more pounds in the next level.
Im not saying Logan is anything like Ratliff, but Ratliff is only 303lbs and been a NT on a 34 D for a very long time.
Yeeeeea, Ratliff is a bit of an anomaly. I don't quite understand how that works out. I honestly don't know if that's due to Ratliff being the only guy on the roster that can play that spot or if he's just a freakishly good stuffer for someone that size.
#35
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:52 PM
BWOOD >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CBSsports + Walter Football
#36
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:53 PM
Yeeeeea, Ratliff is a bit of an anomaly. I don't quite understand how that works out. I honestly don't know if that's due to Ratliff being the only guy on the roster that can play that spot or if he's just a freakishly good stuffer for someone that size.
maybe he's the only 290lbs DT whose legs are built like an OX
#37
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:53 PM
CBS sports = fugging draft guru's
Always right, they no everything, no questions, hands down the best, always fugging right.
CBS and Walterfootball should be GMs, they are god, they know so much more than every human being alive.
Quiet kid, grown ups are trying to talk football. If you have nothing constructive to contribute then gtfo. In just about any thread you don't start you whine and bitch and act like a spoiled little fuging brat. Grow the fug up or get the fug out.
#38
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:54 PM
Yea it's possible...but if I were the Dolphins I'd still spend my first pick on one. It's not like either of those guys are world beaters and they need a young guy to grow with Tannehill.
Yea if I was Miami and even if I picked of Jennings/Bowe in FA, I might still take Keenan in the draft. They literally have no receiver
#39
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:55 PM
well based on cbssports.com, Im guessing you're taking some guy named Hugh Thornton from Illinois over Keenan Allen?
I dont think 4 or 5 O-lineman will be taken in the first 13 picks, so I think there might be a higher pedigree player there than Hugh Thorton. Could be Warmack or Barrett jones.
#40
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:58 PM
I dont think 4 or 5 O-lineman will be taken in the first 13 picks, so I think there might be a higher pedigree player there than Hugh Thorton. Could be Warmack or Barrett jones.
my bad I was going by no.5 overall OG.
I'm guessing DJ Fluker over Keenan? Id probably still take Keenan.
He'd fill a serious need of the future and we could still get an OL just as good as Fluker in the 2nd rd.
#41
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:05 PM
my bad I was going by no.5 overall OG.
I'm guessing DJ Fluker over Keenan? Id probably still take Keenan.
He'd fill a serious need of the future and we could still get an OL just as good as Fluker in the 2nd rd.
Dont get me wrong, Allen could be a really good receiver. I think for this team at this time, OL would be more valuable to protect a dynamic QB who can make WR's with lesser talent very productive.
#42
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:08 PM
Quiet kid, grown ups are trying to talk football. If you have nothing constructive to contribute then gtfo. In just about any thread you don't start you whine and bitch and act like a spoiled little fuging brat. Grow the fug up or get the fug out.
Yeah yeah yeah that's exactly what's happening!!!
Why don't you go take a look at the front page of the draft forum and tell me how many threads are mine. How many fugging prospect threads I create a week to try and get names out and talk football.
But the only other people that hang in the draft forum are guys that have never watched a college football game in their lives, and are literally just talking football based on what the draft Gods of Walterfootball and CBS sports have to say.
When you have to sit and read the same mock drafts and talk "football" according to Walterfootball and CBS sports, that's not fugging football talk lol.
When users can't even use a search button to refrain from reposting a thread on a prospect, that's when you know it's a joke, and that there ain't know real football talk going on.
Y'all let me know when you wanna move on from posting mock drafts and slurping walterfootball and rob rang lol. Let the adults talk SMH...
#43
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:11 PM
than you are not drafting bpa more inlikely.4th or 5th rated OL.
#44
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:11 PM
than you are not drafting bpa more inlikely.
I would be drafting on team needs.
#45
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:12 PM
Yeah yeah yeah that's exactly what's happening!!!
Why don't you go take a look at the front page of the draft forum and tell me how many threads are mine. How many fugging prospect threads I create a week to try and get names out and talk football.
But the only other people that hang in the draft forum are guys that have never watched a college football game in their lives, and are literally just talking football based on what the draft Gods of Walterfootball and CBS sports have to say.
When you have to sit and read the same mock drafts and talk "football" according to Walterfootball and CBS sports, that's not fugging football talk lol.
When users can't even use a search button to refrain from reposting a thread on a prospect, that's when you know it's a joke, and that there ain't know real football talk going on.
Y'all let me know when you wanna move on from posting mock drafts and slurping walterfootball and rob rang lol. Let the adults talk SMH...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





