what? no, but there are WRs who would be great compliments to him that can run vertically up field and take some of the coverage away from Smith with potential to become a #1 WR. you dont know who you are getting, until you get them. the Falcons had Roddy but still traded the farm for Julio. Packers had a stable of WRs but still brought more in. the Giants had Nicks/Cruz but still spent a 2nd on Randle. most successful teams give their QBs plenty of weapons.
and you right Hurney did try to find WRs in trash can behind Golden Wonk.
Yep! Todays game has change. It's hard for a team to win with just one true no.1 WR like a Calvin or Larry. Its a pass happy offense that you have a lot of true no.2 WR looking like no.1. It's a receivers by committee group.
For example, look at Baltimore. Torrey Smith back then would look like what he is, a no.2 WR in any offense. Now even though he's a no.2 receiver hes one who can stretch the field. He completely destroyed Champ last weekend.
Also GB has a bunch of no.1 receivers that won't look like theyre no.1 (that go to guy). The ball is being spread everywhere on the field. Everyone is going to do their part. I rather have two no.1 receivers who can stretch the field than a true go to guy in today's offense.
Hopkins, Twill and Rogers seemed like they're guys who can score tds. That's what we need.