Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Would you trade our #1 for next year's #1 and this year 2nd?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
20 replies to this topic

#13 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2013 - 09:45 AM

Doubt Andy Reid would do it but if he took Luke J number 1, and then traded back into the first for Geno, then, we would be good


Im just not sure if Geno will be there at 14.

#14 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2013 - 09:49 AM

It would depend on the potential trade partner. If it was Jax, I'd do it. If it was San Fran or Baltimore, I'd want more than that.


I dont think Jax would try to trade up. If it did, it would have to be a team like who the OP said above, someone who think that they're a player away from winning (i.e. Atl trade for Julio 2011). Also it would be a team with "two 2nd rounders" like Miami or Cincy. I havent check but Im thinking SF and Baltimore doesnt have two 2nd rds. I might be wrong.

#15 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • Joined: 13-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,752
  • Reputation: 2,345
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2013 - 10:12 AM

Also it would be a team with "two 2nd rounders" like Miami or Cincy. I havent check but Im thinking SF and Baltimore doesnt have two 2nd rds. I might be wrong.


I just used those teams as examples. The point is, I wouldn't trade 14 this year for say 60 this year and a likely 25+ next year.

And a potential partner would not necessarily need to have 2 seconds, they'd just have to be willing to part with the one they do have.

#16 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2013 - 10:28 AM

I just used those teams as examples. The point is, I wouldn't trade 14 this year for say 60 this year and a likely 25+ next year.

And a potential partner would not necessarily need to have 2 seconds, they'd just have to be willing to part with the one they do have.


Yea, very true.

2012: Minnesota traded back up for Harrison Smith in the 1st by giving up their only 2nd round pick and a 4th to trade up to no.29.

Tampa who owned two 2nd rounders in 2012 also traded their one of their 2nd rd (no.36) and no.101 to NE for Doug Martin.

So, I can see both scenario happening.

#17 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 9,435
  • Reputation: 5,219
SUPPORTER

Posted 18 January 2013 - 11:00 AM

I would try to get more. Maybe another pick in the 4th or something.

#18 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 9,435
  • Reputation: 5,219
SUPPORTER

Posted 18 January 2013 - 11:10 AM

Also, where we are drafting makes it tough because there are no guarantees in terms of who will be available. If a deal is struck it could be done with less than 2 minutes on the clock. There could be multiple offers and an enticing player on the board. A tough scenario for our new GM.I an in favor of acquiring assets. But we need to hit on ALL of them.

#19 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,754
  • Reputation: 2,118
SUPPORTER

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:21 PM

Absolutely I'd do that trade. We're out of contention for any elite players except maybe Warmack and that extra 1st could potentially be used to move up to take one of those WRs next year that look so high potential.

#20 Mage

Mage

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-January 10
  • posts: 1,713
  • Reputation: 852
SUPPORTER

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:25 PM

Hell yes! Next years draft is going to be LOADED! And who knows, maybe the team we trade with has a major injury (never would hope for it of course) and we land a top five pick? Then we'd have the option of drafting guys like Clowney, Nix (the Irish Chocolate for those not familiar with this name - IMO the most underrated player in CFB and was the best player on that Notre Dame defense), Lee, etc. <3333

#21 rodeo

rodeo

    Keelah se'lai

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,285
  • Reputation: 5,439
HUDDLER

Posted 18 January 2013 - 02:48 PM

Depends on what pick the 2nd is. If it's 33-43, sure. If it's 60, no.