Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Feb 4, 2000 Shula fired as OC...


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
93 replies to this topic

#81 CollegePanther

CollegePanther

    President

  • Joined: 16-January 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,520
  • Reputation: 713
  • LocationNorth Carolina
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 12:51 PM

The entire offense improved greatly once he was canned.

Next...

His QB was Trent Dilfer. In Shula's last two years in TB, their offense was ranked 22nd and 28th. In the two years after he was fired their offense was ranked 21st and 24th. Improved greatly? Next...

#82 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 20,088
  • Reputation: 14,958
MFCEO

Posted 19 January 2013 - 12:52 PM

His QB was Trent Dilfer. In Shula's last two years in TB, their offense was ranked 22nd and 28th. In the two years after he was fired their offense was ranked 21st and 24th. Improved greatly? Next...



Check the scoring stats.

Shula's biggest problem in Tampa and at Alabama for that matter was going full retard in the red zone.

#83 Sloth

Sloth

    idk

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,757
  • Reputation: 851
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 12:59 PM

His QB was Trent Dilfer. In Shula's last two years in TB, their offense was ranked 22nd and 28th. In the two years after he was fired their offense was ranked 21st and 24th. Improved greatly? Next...


They jumped from 27th to 6th in points scored the year after Shula was fired.

#84 TheMaulClaw

TheMaulClaw

    Member

  • Joined: 10-December 08
  • posts: 3,620
  • Reputation: 1,143
  • LocationCharleston SC
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 01:08 PM



30th in passing, 28th overall offense yet Dungy still got them to the playoffs with that dominant "Tampa 2" defense. Dungy was a hell of a coach.

Under Shula the Bucs went 5 games with 0 touchdowns in 1999. Vomit.



The Bucs didn't really have any offensive weapons at this point in time. Dungy "a great coach" must have like Shula to let him run his offense, and that was 13 years ago. I wonder if you would get better at your job after 13 years?

#85 CollegePanther

CollegePanther

    President

  • Joined: 16-January 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,520
  • Reputation: 713
  • LocationNorth Carolina
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 01:14 PM

They jumped from 27th to 6th in points scored the year after Shula was fired.

They also had a different starting QB, RB, and signed Keyshawn Johnson at WR.

#86 Sloth

Sloth

    idk

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,757
  • Reputation: 851
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 01:32 PM

They also had a different starting QB, RB, and signed Keyshawn Johnson at WR.


In your opinion, who was a better QB, Dilfer or Shaun King? Was Johnson the main reason they shifted up 21 spots in scoring?

#87 Cyberjag

Cyberjag

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,830
  • Reputation: 638
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 02:14 PM

I seriously doubt that anyone here defending the selection would have had him on a short list of potential OCs had RIvera not put him there. A month ago, if you had polled the board about Shula the consensus would have been that he's a great QB coach, but a lousy OC. That's exactly what was said about him when he was hired.

But now, a head coach with two years left on his contract and one real year to win decides to promote him to OC, and suddenly he's not only the logical choice, he's going to be really good and his prior performance should not count when we talk about his qualifications. And besides, there are a ton of excuses available for why he did so poorly when he was actually calling plays.

Wouldn't it be nice, for a change, if we had coaches that didn't need excuses?

#88 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,422
  • Reputation: 2,152
  • LocationAt the lake
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 02:27 PM

I seriously doubt that anyone here defending the selection would have had him on a short list of potential OCs had RIvera not put him there. A month ago, if you had polled the board about Shula the consensus would have been that he's a great QB coach, but a lousy OC. That's exactly what was said about him when he was hired.

But now, a head coach with two years left on his contract and one real year to win decides to promote him to OC, and suddenly he's not only the logical choice, he's going to be really good and his prior performance should not count when we talk about his qualifications. And besides, there are a ton of excuses available for why he did so poorly when he was actually calling plays.

Wouldn't it be nice, for a change, if we had coaches that didn't need excuses?


I don't think he needs excuses. What he needs, is to be judged based on his current merits rather than the way he performed 6 or 15 years ago. People defending the choice are being loyal to the Panthers or Rivera and hoping for the best. People deriding it, are disappointed their favorite wasn't chosen. I wanted Jackson but it didn't happen so we are going with Shula. Not my choice but one I am going to get behind and support. After all why not hope for the best.. Especially in the offseason. There will be plenty of time to harpoon him in preseason or during the year the minute our offense stalls. I guess it is too soon to expect people to accept it, whether they like it or not. Not agree or even support it, just minimize the grumbling until justified.Then again it is the off-season and what else is there to talk about. I would love to be talking about playing right now instead of next year. Here is hoping that next year is our year.

#89 Cyberjag

Cyberjag

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,830
  • Reputation: 638
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 03:05 PM

I don't think he needs excuses. What he needs, is to be judged based on his current merits rather than the way he performed 6 or 15 years ago. People defending the choice are being loyal to the Panthers or Rivera and hoping for the best. People deriding it, are disappointed their favorite wasn't chosen. I wanted Jackson but it didn't happen so we are going with Shula. Not my choice but one I am going to get behind and support. After all why not hope for the best.. Especially in the offseason. There will be plenty of time to harpoon him in preseason or during the year the minute our offense stalls. I guess it is too soon to expect people to accept it, whether they like it or not. Not agree or even support it, just minimize the grumbling until justified.Then again it is the off-season and what else is there to talk about. I would love to be talking about playing right now instead of next year. Here is hoping that next year is our year.

It's not a question of whether or not we support him and hope he does well, I hope everyone here does that and I certainly will.

It was still a shitty hire, and it pisses me off as a fan that I have to support it. I want a real reason to get excited about the next season, not some manufactured bullshit based on ignoring all the failures a hire had at calling plays before he came to Carolina.

#90 goodoleboy

goodoleboy

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 586
  • Reputation: 44
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 03:25 PM

Honestly Shula is probably as good as we were going to get. How many good OC's are willing to hitch their wagons to Rivera's sinking ship? Unless they thought they might get a shot at the head coach job.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users