Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

For everyone that thinks our offense would be top-tier if Chud stopped going full-retard...


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#21 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,898
  • Reputation: 7,795
Moderators

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:45 AM

Which you have stated over and over and over and over and over and over...I usually like your posts, but all of you guys have become unbearable. I love this place, but if this is what its gonna be like until the season starts, its gonna be hard to come back here. And before you say ," good then leave." I like what this place was before the Shula hire. Just get over it, move on and start posting like you usually do.

Posted Image

#22 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • posts: 11,388
  • Reputation: 9,239
  • LocationAsheville, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:45 AM

I give up. Last Shula post ill make.

#23 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • Joined: 13-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,748
  • Reputation: 2,344
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:46 AM

I have been one of the drivers of the send Chud packing bus, so the fact he is gone has made me a happy camper.

However, the premise of the OP is just flat inane. Basically, you are saying that since Chud sucked, all we have to do is replace him and we'll be better. Don't you think the quality of the replacement matters at all? So we could take any of the posters here, give them Chud's old playbook, and we'll be good to go? Don't think so.

#24 teeray

teeray

    THE SWAGNIFICENT

  • Joined: 10-January 11
  • posts: 16,888
  • Reputation: 8,780
SUPPORTER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:03 AM

He never had to start King. He had Dilfer for his entire tenure.

His replacement came in and jumped the offense all the way up to 6th. With Shaun King.


No mention that he took a QB that had 4 TDs and 18 INTS as a rookie in 2005 and in two seasons Shula had him at 21 TDs and 11 INTs in 2007? He took a guy that was as bad or worse than Jimmy Clausen and made him respectable.

And he was replaced by Les Steckel in 2000 who was a failure in Minnesota . I wonder if the fans were like "NOOOOO he was a failure in Minnesota in 1986 where his offense finished near the bottom of the NFL... Derpa derpa!!1111!"

By the way Steckel failed in Minnesota, then 13 years later was hired by Tennessee as OC and was successful. Hmmmmm
.

#25 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,112
  • Reputation: 5,285
Moderators

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:11 AM

He never had to start King. He had Dilfer for his entire tenure.

His replacement came in and jumped the offense all the way up to 6th. With Shaun King.

King went 4-1 as a starter under Shula in 1999 as a rookie. Not his fault he was stuck with Dilfer so long.

#26 Sloth

Sloth

    idk

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,757
  • Reputation: 851
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:15 AM

No mention that he took a QB that had 4 TDs and 18 INTS as a rookie in 2005 and in two seasons Shula had him at 21 TDs and 11 INTs in 2007? He took a guy that was as bad or worse than Jimmy Clausen and made him respectable.

And he was replaced by Les Steckel in 2000 who was a failure in Minnesota . I wonder if the fans were like "NOOOOO he was a failure in Minnesota in 1986 where his offense finished near the bottom of the NFL... Derpa derpa!!1111!"

By the way Steckel failed in Minnesota, then 13 years later was hired by Tennessee as OC and was successful. Hmmmmm
.


As HC? Did Bama not have an OC or QB coach? Can we throw out Shula's work with Cam and assign credit for his development to Rivera?

Also, since it looks like the metric for successful coaching is failure + indeterminate amount of time, I really think we should keep Jeff Davidson's name in mind. He was horrible, but that was years ago and he's got to be getting good now.

#27 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,112
  • Reputation: 5,285
Moderators

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:31 AM

He never had to start King. He had Dilfer for his entire tenure.

His replacement came in and jumped the offense all the way up to 6th. With Shaun King.


His last year he Tampa went 7-3 with Dilfer and 4-1 with King.

There offense was technically ranked 21st that next season....O rankings are based on yards.

But like I said, it is about the Jimmy and Joes for a OC. Look at who his QBs and WRs were......they were bums. Give anyone bums and the O will suck. There is a reason they went out and got Keyshawn the year after.

#28 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,801
  • Reputation: 845
  • LocationCape Fear Area
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:35 AM

Yeah I'm on Shula's side until he proves himself otherwise.

#29 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,112
  • Reputation: 5,285
Moderators

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:35 AM

As HC? Did Bama not have an OC or QB coach? Can we throw out Shula's work with Cam and assign credit for his development to Rivera?

Also, since it looks like the metric for successful coaching is failure + indeterminate amount of time, I really think we should keep Jeff Davidson's name in mind. He was horrible, but that was years ago and he's got to be getting good now.


I don't recall anyone saying Davidson sucked when Carolina went 12-4 in 2008 ( top 10 O in yards and pts)....which was the only season he didn't have laughable QB play overall on a season sabataging things.

Guys on the field ultimately is what matters....

#30 Sloth

Sloth

    idk

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,757
  • Reputation: 851
HUDDLER

Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:37 AM

I don't recall anyone saying Davidson sucked when Carolina went 12-4 in 2008 ( top 10 O in yards and pts)....which was the only season he didn't have laughable QB play overall on a season sabataging things.

Guys on the field ultimately is what matters....


Just to make sure I understand, your position is that Davidson was a good OC being held back by players?

Or is it that coaches don't matter at all and it's all on what players you have?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users