switch those 2 and you got a deal.
Just draft Fluker in the first and Patterson in the 2nd... Problem solved lol
Why i think well take a WR at the top of the draft
Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:26 PM
Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:41 PM
Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:43 PM
Posted 21 January 2013 - 10:14 PM
I guess everybody assumes we will have a good secondary. The fact that Gamble and Capt could both be gone doesn't scare anybody I guess.
No, Thomas and Dockery are all-pro corners
Posted 22 January 2013 - 12:23 AM
I'd like a developmental DT in the fourth, maybe, if we had to go WR and/or OT/OG early. To be fair, my defensive heart would rather go defense, like CB or obviously DT first, but if Warmack's there, the value's just too good to pass up. Fluker would be another worthy consideration. I'm prepared to see Gross and Gamble both go, but that would also possibly create too many roster holes on an already thin roster.
Stick with your defensive heart.
Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:42 AM
Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:59 AM
Yeah, that philosophy of addressing the DT position has worked out so well for us.
Believe you me, I'd much rather see us get an impact defensive tackle in the first or maybe second, but every time I hope for that in the draft, it never seems to happen. I really, really hope Gettleman can find a way to solve that for us.
Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:24 AM
Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:30 AM
Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:33 AM
Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:43 AM
Patterson and Terrance Williams are the only WR's I'd be comfortable with in the 1st round.
At 14 neither one them or any wr in this draft is comfortable pick for me.
Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:51 AM
Posted 22 January 2013 - 04:10 AM
Patterson will be a legit top-15 ranked prospect by draft day.
How much money do you want to put on that?
I say he doesn't get picked in the top 20.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users