Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Why i think well take a WR at the top of the draft


  • Please log in to reply
139 replies to this topic

#91 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,497 posts
  • LocationDa City

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:23 PM

Just draft Fluker in the first and Patterson in the 2nd... Problem solved lol

switch those 2 and you got a deal.

#92 FastNFurious

FastNFurious

    MEMBER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 343 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:26 PM

You could have Jerry Rice in his prime, and it wouldn't matter if your o-line can't pass block. David G sounds like a guy who will put an emphasis on both lines...

#93 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:41 PM

I guess everybody assumes we will have a good secondary. The fact that Gamble and Capt could both be gone doesn't scare anybody I guess.

#94 bigskypanthersguy

bigskypanthersguy

    Prowl, Cats, Prowl.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,359 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:43 PM

I'd like a developmental DT in the fourth, maybe, if we had to go WR and/or OT/OG early. To be fair, my defensive heart would rather go defense, like CB or obviously DT first, but if Warmack's there, the value's just too good to pass up. Fluker would be another worthy consideration. I'm prepared to see Gross and Gamble both go, but that would also possibly create too many roster holes on an already thin roster.

#95 beastson

beastson

    Cam

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,809 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 10:14 PM

I guess everybody assumes we will have a good secondary. The fact that Gamble and Capt could both be gone doesn't scare anybody I guess.


No, Thomas and Dockery are all-pro corners

#96 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 January 2013 - 12:23 AM

I'd like a developmental DT in the fourth, maybe, if we had to go WR and/or OT/OG early. To be fair, my defensive heart would rather go defense, like CB or obviously DT first, but if Warmack's there, the value's just too good to pass up. Fluker would be another worthy consideration. I'm prepared to see Gross and Gamble both go, but that would also possibly create too many roster holes on an already thin roster.



Stick with your defensive heart.

#97 LinvilleGorge

LinvilleGorge

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,406 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 12:27 AM

I'd like a developmental DT in the fourth


Yeah, that philosophy of addressing the DT position has worked out so well for us.

#98 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,466 posts
  • LocationAt the lake

Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:42 AM

If you are looking at value at 14, you pick the hardest guy to replace in free agency due to prohibitive cost at that position. So OT would be in play as would DE, corner, or WR. Of course who is there when we pick and how highly we have them rated will decide with way we go unless we are drafting need instead of BPA. I am most worried about corner this year but I don't have a clue about who might actually be available in free agency and what we will have to spend. But picking a corner in the first 2 rounds is the only way we assure they can come in and contribute right away. Unless you like who we have. WR is definitely a need, the question is when we address it and in what round. Do we look for a contributor or a star.

#99 bigskypanthersguy

bigskypanthersguy

    Prowl, Cats, Prowl.

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,359 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 01:59 AM

Yeah, that philosophy of addressing the DT position has worked out so well for us.


Believe you me, I'd much rather see us get an impact defensive tackle in the first or maybe second, but every time I hope for that in the draft, it never seems to happen. I really, really hope Gettleman can find a way to solve that for us.

#100 PantherFan52

PantherFan52

    The Man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,410 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:24 AM

Tavon Austin FTW. I am a fan. I wouldn't not oppose drafting him at the 14.

#101 Catalyst

Catalyst

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,107 posts
  • LocationMorehead City

Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:30 AM

Patterson and Terrance Williams are the only WR's I'd be comfortable with in the 1st round.

#102 PantherFan52

PantherFan52

    The Man

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,410 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:33 AM

While I agree both are fine receivers, Austin has the "IT" factor that people look for in players. His ability is unreal and I really feel like he would be sick in the slot for us. So dangerous with weapons like Smitty, Lafell, Austin, and Olsen.

#103 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:43 AM

Patterson and Terrance Williams are the only WR's I'd be comfortable with in the 1st round.


At 14 neither one them or any wr in this draft is comfortable pick for me.

#104 Catalyst

Catalyst

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,107 posts
  • LocationMorehead City

Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:51 AM

Patterson will be a legit top-15 ranked prospect by draft day.

#105 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 January 2013 - 04:10 AM

Patterson will be a legit top-15 ranked prospect by draft day.



How much money do you want to put on that?

I say he doesn't get picked in the top 20.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.