Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

We Have To Find A Way To Keep Beast and Gamble

48 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Build on offense through the draft and FA

We have to keep Gamble as I watch this Falcons game. I'm not too knowledgeable on contracts though like some

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'm no expert on the cap either, but I believe:

Cut Gamble=Save a lot

Trade Beason for whatever you can get=Save a lot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'd love to keep Gamble. It's not going to happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

beason gamble and gross are going to be gone.. deal with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

You can thank Hurney the cap genius for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

expendable, unfortunately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

A lot of guys may end up joining gamble on the chop block. I don't think we can afford to cut Beason. Penalty is too much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

As far on on the field play, I would love to keep both. Beason and Gamble would make our defense better. But with the pickup of LK, Beason is not someone we must keep. If him being gone helps the cap numbers, then its something we have to do. Same with Gamble, although I think we need him a little more than Beason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Gamble is about done...time to cut bait and draft our first promising young corner since we drafted Gamble.

I'd agree to keep Beason with a different contract. But paying 50 mil to a linebacker who is oft-injured and already on the smaller side as far as LBs go...not a fan of doing that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'm no expert on the cap either, but I believe:

Cut Gamble=Save a lot

Trade Beason for whatever you can get=Save a lot

You are correct on gamble but cutting/trading beason costs more that keeping him because his remaining bonus money >what he counts this coming year.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Josh Thomas and Dockery handled these guys pretty well.......I guess Gamble's name is more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Josh Thomas and Dockery handled these guys pretty well.......I guess Gamble's name is more important.

I'm telling people don't put faith into a undrafted and 5th round player

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites