Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

We Have To Find A Way To Keep Beast and Gamble


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#1 beastson

beastson

    Cam

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,807 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:52 PM

Build on offense through the draft and FA

We have to keep Gamble as I watch this Falcons game. I'm not too knowledgeable on contracts though like some

#2 Black

Black

    Don't Make Me Get Money and Platinumize My Body

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,318 posts
  • LocationNC

Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:54 PM

I'm no expert on the cap either, but I believe:

Cut Gamble=Save a lot

Trade Beason for whatever you can get=Save a lot

#3 megadeth078

megadeth078

    hate hate hate

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,993 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:56 PM

I'd love to keep Gamble. It's not going to happen.

#4 Toolbox

Toolbox

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,053 posts
  • Locationnc

Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:56 PM

beason gamble and gross are going to be gone.. deal with it.

#5 jtnc

jtnc

    Resident Asshole

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,287 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:06 PM

You can thank Hurney the cap genius for that.

#6 PhillyB

PhillyB

    hug it chug it football

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,745 posts
  • LocationGreensboro

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:07 PM

expendable, unfortunately.

#7 Rubi

Rubi

    Squid Smasher

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,294 posts
  • LocationCharlotte

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:12 PM

A lot of guys may end up joining gamble on the chop block. I don't think we can afford to cut Beason. Penalty is too much.

#8 Davidson Deac II

Davidson Deac II

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,318 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:16 PM

As far on on the field play, I would love to keep both. Beason and Gamble would make our defense better. But with the pickup of LK, Beason is not someone we must keep. If him being gone helps the cap numbers, then its something we have to do. Same with Gamble, although I think we need him a little more than Beason.

#9 unicar15

unicar15

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,612 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:22 PM

Gamble is about done...time to cut bait and draft our first promising young corner since we drafted Gamble.

I'd agree to keep Beason with a different contract. But paying 50 mil to a linebacker who is oft-injured and already on the smaller side as far as LBs go...not a fan of doing that.

#10 Manos

Manos

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 366 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:23 PM

I'm no expert on the cap either, but I believe:

Cut Gamble=Save a lot

Trade Beason for whatever you can get=Save a lot


You are correct on gamble but cutting/trading beason costs more that keeping him because his remaining bonus money >what he counts this coming year.

#11 Swaggasaurus

Swaggasaurus

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,727 posts
  • LocationWilkesboro

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:31 PM

Josh Thomas and Dockery handled these guys pretty well.......I guess Gamble's name is more important.

#12 beastson

beastson

    Cam

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,807 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:36 PM

Josh Thomas and Dockery handled these guys pretty well.......I guess Gamble's name is more important.


I'm telling people don't put faith into a undrafted and 5th round player

#13 SCMunnerlyn1

SCMunnerlyn1

    The Fuhckening has begun

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,279 posts
  • LocationValdosta Georgia

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:38 PM

Gamble is expendable imo.

#14 JeramiahCopperfield

JeramiahCopperfield

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 565 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:39 PM

Gamble has never been good but has many defenders for some reason

#15 UNCrules2187

UNCrules2187

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,845 posts

Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:46 PM

The Panthers are projected to be $11.8m over the cap after counting for salary carryover from this year. Cutting Haruki Nakamura (clear $1.8m off the cap), Ron Edwards ($2.5m), and, sadly, Chris Gamble (a whopping $7.9m, pretty much have to cut him) would clear up $12.2m which gets us under the cap. Restructure Gross ($11.7m cap figure), Beason ($9.5m figure), and DeAngelo ($8.2m cap figure) would give us room to sign our draft class and potentially a few lower-tier FAs.

Most likely scenario IMO.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.