We Have To Find A Way To Keep Beast and Gamble
#1
Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:52 PM
We have to keep Gamble as I watch this Falcons game. I'm not too knowledgeable on contracts though like some
#2
Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:54 PM
Cut Gamble=Save a lot
Trade Beason for whatever you can get=Save a lot
#3
Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:56 PM
#4
Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:56 PM
#5
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:06 PM
#6
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:07 PM
#7
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:12 PM
#8
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:16 PM
#9
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:22 PM
I'd agree to keep Beason with a different contract. But paying 50 mil to a linebacker who is oft-injured and already on the smaller side as far as LBs go...not a fan of doing that.
#10
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:23 PM
I'm no expert on the cap either, but I believe:
Cut Gamble=Save a lot
Trade Beason for whatever you can get=Save a lot
You are correct on gamble but cutting/trading beason costs more that keeping him because his remaining bonus money >what he counts this coming year.
#11
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:31 PM
#12
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:36 PM
Josh Thomas and Dockery handled these guys pretty well.......I guess Gamble's name is more important.
I'm telling people don't put faith into a undrafted and 5th round player
#13
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:38 PM
#14
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:39 PM
#15
Posted 20 January 2013 - 04:46 PM
Most likely scenario IMO.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





