Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Geneticist seeks woman to help make a cloned cave baby


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 NanuqoftheNorth

NanuqoftheNorth

    Frosty Alaskan Amber

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,284 posts
  • LocationAlaska

Posted 21 January 2013 - 02:38 AM

GenomeWeb caught what must be an interesting Q&A with George Church in Germany’s Spiegel Online (I can’t personally attest to the original story as it is behind a paywall). The Harvard Medical School geneticist is quoted as saying that eventually, an “adventurous female human” will be needed to be the surrogate mother for the first Neanderthal baby in some 30,000 years.
This isn’t the first time Church has talked publically about cloning a Neanderthal, or at least a near-Neanderthal. In 2009, when the Neanderthal genome was first reported, the New York Times described a scenario in which a current day human genome could be tweaked into the “Neanderthal equivalent” with tools of molecular biology. Eventually, this could lead to a Neanderthal-like embryo in need of a surrogate mother.
While the idea of reviving Neanderthals may sound farfetched, take for example the work of biologists to clone endangered or extinct non-human animals (see “Stem-Cell Engineering Offers a Lifeline to Endangered Species”). In 2009, the extinct bucardo, a subspecies Spanish ibex, was cloned from a frozen skin sample. The newborn died immediately due to respiratory failure, but its birth suggests that resurrecting extinct species may be possible. http://t.now.msn.com...eanderthal-baby

#2 Baby Andy Reid

Baby Andy Reid

    finally someone fatter than Alice

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,263 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:33 AM

Humans haven't really changed, technology has. Idiots. If we had evolved there would still be some remnants of a lesser species, yet there is not.

#3 Zod

Zod

    YOUR RULER

  • MFCEO
  • 20,086 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:53 AM

Humans haven't really changed, technology has. Idiots. If we had evolved there would still be some remnants of a lesser species, yet there is not.



Aren't some babies born with a tail sometimes?

#4 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,155 posts
  • LocationMontford

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:09 AM

Falcon fans are a lesser species

#5 Doyle

Doyle

    Headed to the county line

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,090 posts
  • LocationRiverboat Rivera

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:36 AM

He/she will immediately be the new Geico spokesperson.

#6 catfang

catfang

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,247 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:43 AM

This can't be considered anything but a bad idea.

#7 Jase

Jase

    Kuechold Fantasies

  • Administrators
  • 16,845 posts
  • LocationMatthews, NC

Posted 21 January 2013 - 09:01 AM

science in the hands of the morally bereft. :(

So let's just skip to dinosaurs already, shall we?

#8 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,389 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 02:18 PM

What would be the purpose of this?

Would we treat this "human" as something we'd put in a cage and treat as a chimp?

There are a lot of philosophical questions to be answered.

#9 catfang

catfang

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,247 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 02:29 PM

What would be the purpose of this?

Would we treat this "human" as something we'd put in a cage and treat as a chimp?

There are a lot of philosophical questions to be answered.


Keep it in a cave. Cave baby.

#10 PhillyB

PhillyB

    that jungle football

  • ALL-PRO
  • 19,672 posts
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun

Posted 21 January 2013 - 02:42 PM

it's my understanding that neandertals are morphologically different from modern homo sapiens but not significantly different cognitively (their brains being, on average, larger than homo sapiens.) so I'd assume it could live a normal life.

G5 is right though, lots of complicated philosohical questions to consider here. I hope the researchers have adequately addressed them.

#11 SZ James

SZ James

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,737 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 03:13 PM

nvm

#12 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,950 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:24 PM

Humans haven't really changed, technology has. Idiots. If we had evolved there would still be some remnants of a lesser species, yet there is not.


I dont think you understand how evolution works

#13 Baby Andy Reid

Baby Andy Reid

    finally someone fatter than Alice

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,263 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:01 PM

I dont think you understand how evolution works


Inform me.

#14 88 Bronco

88 Bronco

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,901 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:56 PM

Inform me.


http://lmgtfy.com/?q... evolution work

#15 Kevin Greene

Kevin Greene

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,831 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:17 PM

I can see this cloned cave man showing up at your doorstep to date your daughter.
Clubs her over the head and drags her out on a date.
Wave and say "Be home before the Saber tooths come out.".


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com