Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Geneticist seeks woman to help make a cloned cave baby

28 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

GenomeWeb caught what must be an interesting Q&A with George Church in Germany’s Spiegel Online (I can’t personally attest to the original story as it is behind a paywall). The Harvard Medical School geneticist is quoted as saying that eventually, an “adventurous female human” will be needed to be the surrogate mother for the first Neanderthal baby in some 30,000 years.

This isn’t the first time Church has talked publically about cloning a Neanderthal, or at least a near-Neanderthal. In 2009, when the Neanderthal genome was first reported, the New York Times described a scenario in which a current day human genome could be tweaked into the “Neanderthal equivalent” with tools of molecular biology. Eventually, this could lead to a Neanderthal-like embryo in need of a surrogate mother.

While the idea of reviving Neanderthals may sound farfetched, take for example the work of biologists to clone endangered or extinct non-human animals (see “Stem-Cell Engineering Offers a Lifeline to Endangered Species”). In 2009, the extinct bucardo, a subspecies Spanish ibex, was cloned from a frozen skin sample. The newborn died immediately due to respiratory failure, but its birth suggests that resurrecting extinct species may be possible. http://t.now.msn.com/george-church-says-human-woman-could-bear-neanderthal-baby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Humans haven't really changed, technology has. Idiots. If we had evolved there would still be some remnants of a lesser species, yet there is not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Humans haven't really changed, technology has. Idiots. If we had evolved there would still be some remnants of a lesser species, yet there is not.

Aren't some babies born with a tail sometimes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Falcon fans are a lesser species

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

He/she will immediately be the new Geico spokesperson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

This can't be considered anything but a bad idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

science in the hands of the morally bereft. :(

So let's just skip to dinosaurs already, shall we?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

What would be the purpose of this?

Would we treat this "human" as something we'd put in a cage and treat as a chimp?

There are a lot of philosophical questions to be answered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

What would be the purpose of this?

Would we treat this "human" as something we'd put in a cage and treat as a chimp?

There are a lot of philosophical questions to be answered.

Keep it in a cave. Cave baby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

it's my understanding that neandertals are morphologically different from modern homo sapiens but not significantly different cognitively (their brains being, on average, larger than homo sapiens.) so I'd assume it could live a normal life.

G5 is right though, lots of complicated philosohical questions to consider here. I hope the researchers have adequately addressed them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Humans haven't really changed, technology has. Idiots. If we had evolved there would still be some remnants of a lesser species, yet there is not.

I dont think you understand how evolution works

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites