Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Some Kuechly and Cam bits from our favorite PFW

75 posts in this topic

Posted

pfw is better than espn and a lot of places out there. doesn't make them infallible, just better.

i follow them the way i follow everything else...eat the meat, spit out the bones.

I shoud read more of them, I honestly haven't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Bingo!!

I don't have a problem when a so called "analyst or broadcaster" has a differing opinion on player. My problem is, when they offer these opinions (especially when they're wildly off), when it's obvious they haven't done the research, have a fundamental understanding or actually watched the player or team.

From that point on, you can just ignore the rest of what they say. This happens, waaaay to often in the business. And that's why you have to take a lot of what these people say with a grain of salt. It happens.

those are meant to be off the cuff statements made by industry people. it's not a newton smear agenda.

he's not even talked about all that much.

it was just one little blurb made by someone talking about kaepernick. nothing more to read into it than that. it's not what people are making it out to be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

those are meant to be off the cuff statements made by industry people. it's not a newton smear agenda.

he's not even talked about all that much.

it was just one little blurb made by someone talking about kaepernick. nothing more to read into it than that. it's not what people are making it out to be.

I'm waaaaaaay off Newton here. I'm not even talking about him anymore. I already commented on the article and moved on.

I'm talking about many of the people on NFL Network and ESPN--in general (for example), who readily offer their opinion.

Many people take what these people say as the Gospel, when so many are less informed (at least about certain teams, coaches and players) than many here even. However, it's not always their job to know what they're talking about (that's an individual decision). But it is their job to offer an opinion, provide entertainment or create chatter.

Trust me, I'm well aware how the business is (though I appreciate it). ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It reminds me of that former 'Aints FB on NFLN who was debating with i think Champ Bailey and was saying that Chip Kelly wouldn't make a good coach because he didn't win a National Championship. The other dude (Champ I think) was like the, "THE DUDE WENT 46-7, after YEARS of mediocrity," and the baldheaded meathead was like, "yea he wont make a good coach though cause his defense was poo and he didn't win a national championship." He was legitimately getting mad. It's pretty much like a drunken conversation someone would have when you are so drunk that you are rambling utter nonsense. It is the NFL network for christ sake.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

It reminds me of that former 'Aints FB on NFLN who was debating with i think Champ Bailey and was saying that Chip Kelly wouldn't make a good coach because he didn't win a National Championship. The other dude (Champ I think) was like the, "THE DUDE WENT 46-7, after YEARS of mediocrity," and the baldheaded meathead was like, "yea he wont make a good coach though cause his defense was poo and he didn't win a national championship." He was legitimately getting mad. It's pretty much like a drunken conversation someone would have when you are so drunk that you are rambling utter nonsense. It is the NFL network for christ sake.

Yeah, I think you're talking about Heath Evan's.

He's used to play at Auburn, I think to, as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Yeah, I think you're talking about Heath Evan's.

He's used to play at Auburn, I think to, as well.

Yep, that's the guy, I try not to remember former Saints players names as much as possible. Especially loudmouth fullbacks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

For the people arguing with me last night about who's faster, read OP.

Lol you were wrong then, your still wrong now, now you just have someone to be wrong with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Was someone actually arguing that Cam was faster than Squidward?

Edit: I mean, I'm not looking up times but it seems pretty fuging obvious that Cam is slower. Bigger and has a better arm, but definitely slower.

Yup, AceBoogie and Rook35200 were saying so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Was someone actually arguing that Cam was faster than Squidward?

Edit: I mean, I'm not looking up times but it seems pretty fuging obvious that Cam is slower. Bigger and has a better arm, but definitely slower.

Double post

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If he is faster than Cam, it is barely... plus Cam is twice as strong, and much harder to bring down.

Cam opened the door, so that guys like Keapernick(sp) could even get a chance.

Hey I love Cam but cmon man give another player some credits.

We're not arguing who's stronger or harder to bring down. What does that even have to do with speed? Kaep is a much faster player than Cam and his burst, first step is faster.

Now, you go and tell me that Cam is the reason why people opened the door for a player like Kaep. You gotta be JOKIN!!!! Both of them were drafted in the same year bro!!! It's guys like Warren Moon, Steve McNair, Culpepper, and Vick who opened the door for guys like Cam, Kaep, Wilson and RGIII.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I love cam to death. Only player who I like more than Kaep... But I can't say I don't get this feeling...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

No, it's just the same old sources that PFW went to pre-draft 2011 where they got the old "fake smile" "bad leader" BS.

Anytime they want to take a shot at Cam, all they have to do is go back to that well.

fyi i've got a source that says that, coincidentally, every defender of pfw's style of "journalism" is in fact a pedophile

surely the posters in this thread that i am referring to won't see anything problematic with hiding behind anonymous sources, particularly when we have compelling evidence to show that cam isn't a "frontrunner" and yet a complete lack of evidence dispelling the rumors that these people are pedophiles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites