Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Senior bowl thread


  • Please log in to reply
152 replies to this topic

#91 wwgd

wwgd

    NOT NEWB

  • Joined: 28-March 12
  • posts: 63
  • Reputation: 16
  • LocationCalifornia
ROOKIE

Posted 24 January 2013 - 04:28 PM

idk about warford in the 3rd. he might go into the 2nd.....i like king too..very good route runner.. he owned robert lester today.....lol



Who didn't own Lester? Dude has looked awful all week.

#92 TopCat

TopCat

    Swerve

  • Joined: 25-December 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,176
  • Reputation: 269
HUDDLER

Posted 24 January 2013 - 04:29 PM

Patton. Do want.

#93 BBQ&Beer

BBQ&Beer

    The good actor

  • Joined: 20-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,965
  • Reputation: 716
  • LocationMissouri
HUDDLER

Posted 24 January 2013 - 04:55 PM

idk about warford in the 3rd. he might go into the 2nd.....


Oh don't get me wrong. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he went in the 2nd. It's just that if (by some miracle) Fisher fell to us in the first, We get a good DT or WR in the 2nd, & when the pick we could've had comes up in the 3rd & Warford is still there... The collective facepalm from Panther fans would register 3.5 on the Richter scale.

Even without the miracle, if we picked up Lane Johnson n the 1st & Warford was there in the 3rd...


i like king too..very good route runner.. he owned robert lester today.....lol


Exactly. Then think about a year or two from now after Smitty & Proehl coaching him up...

Sigh. At any rate, I just wish we had that pick. Wishes, horses, & all that jazz.

#94 BBQ&Beer

BBQ&Beer

    The good actor

  • Joined: 20-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,965
  • Reputation: 716
  • LocationMissouri
HUDDLER

Posted 24 January 2013 - 04:56 PM

Who didn't own Lester? Dude has looked awful all week.


Right? I did not see that coming.

#95 Lout

Lout

    Draft Guru

  • Joined: 06-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,430
  • Reputation: 113
  • LocationTulsa, OK
HUDDLER

Posted 24 January 2013 - 05:34 PM

If Warford made it to the 3rd, who's 3rd round pick will we take him with? I don't like trade-down scenarios to pick up extra picks.. they are unrealistic. If we want Warford.. we'd take him in the 2nd.

#96 BBQ&Beer

BBQ&Beer

    The good actor

  • Joined: 20-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,965
  • Reputation: 716
  • LocationMissouri
HUDDLER

Posted 24 January 2013 - 05:48 PM

If Warford made it to the 3rd, who's 3rd round pick will we take him with? I don't like trade-down scenarios to pick up extra picks.. they are unrealistic. If we want Warford.. we'd take him in the 2nd.


Just to be clear, I'm not saying we should try to get a 3rd rounder*, I'm just saying I wish we had the pick due to the talent I'm seeing that could be available in the 3rd.

*If Gettleman managed to trade rape someone I wouldn't be mad mind you, but I see no reason to actively pursue a trade for Warford or anyone else in the 3rd. Besides, maybe Alexander will catch fire & the point will be moot.

#97 BigSyke

BigSyke

    I Know you Watching me but I'm watching you too Playa...

  • Joined: 07-November 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,192
  • Reputation: 113
  • LocationFLORIDA
HUDDLER

Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:45 PM

idk what (4.35 e) means but i saw a news report that says that by quinton patton's name....i guess it stands for a unofficial 40 time....damnnn that fast.....if he runs that at the combine he gonna go in the late 1st.

#98 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 08-June 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,812
  • Reputation: 2,646
HUDDLER

Posted 25 January 2013 - 12:35 AM

I have not read the other posts yet because I do not want to be influenced or not state something because others have. I will start by stating what some of you may not have thought about, however.

For a fourth or fifth round steal, David Quessenberry (OT) is a player who has good size and feet. He won battles on both days. Not sure about his arm length and he could add about 15 pounds, but if we keep/restructure Gross, he would be a great backup and heir apparent to the LT spot. Jordan Mills was good as a RT, but I started thinking, "Wonder how good his run blocking is? At 322, could he play RG?"

The Corners were nice. McFadden made himself some money. Since we are losing Gamble and probably Munnerlyn, we could use McFadden as a Nickel. While I have been praying for Logan Ryan in the second, Poyer and Trufant were nice. I do not think the CBs were as good as they looked, however, because the WRs at the SR bowl are not that good. However, There are seven day 1 starters in this draft (Milner, Banks, Poyer, Rhodes, Ryan, Trufant, and Amerson if he does not play S). Davis from Utah St is decent too. Webb from W&M would be a good nickel.

At WR, I was impressed with Patton, who probably rose from the third or fourth round to being in the lower first round discussions. The rest? Not so much.

Warford is a day 1 starter. I expect him to be on the board when we pick.

Wilcox, the S from Georgia Southern is a sleeper.

I think we are drafting OL in the first, CB in the second round. That would be very smart. I think we will draft Lane Johnson--he is valued around 30 right now, but expect him to climb after the combine. If the Panthers cut or trade Gross, write it down.

Boy, the QBs suck this year.

#99 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,678
  • Reputation: 2,761
  • LocationKurby
HUDDLER

Posted 25 January 2013 - 12:37 AM

I always talk about Poyer

#100 BelgianPantherFan

BelgianPantherFan

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 19-November 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 502
  • Reputation: 239
  • LocationBelgium
HUDDLER

Posted 25 January 2013 - 03:31 AM

NFL Network is covering the Senior Bowl training days right? Anywhere to view after live coverage? (quite impossible to follow live bcause I live in Europe).


Second try :)


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users