Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

KY is in the SEC? no wai

97 posts in this topic

Posted

Warford is fat and slow, but he is a great blocker. I dont know that Chance is a better pass blocker, it's close. If you can get Warford in 2 it is worth the wait, but he could go before that. Both excel in drive blocking and have a weakness for inside speed moves in pass pro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I didn't say he played in the SEC. Warmack of Bama does.

But yeah, Warford has played most of the big names from the SEC and dominates.

Kentucky is an SEC school.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Duh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Duh?

So is this a question? Idk because you seem to be having trouble reading today. Hangover? Flu? Spontaneous Retardation? I'm just trying to help the real Bwood get back, the one who understands words.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So is this a question? Idk because you seem to be having trouble reading today. Hangover? Flu? Spontaneous Retardation? I'm just trying to help the real Bwood get back, the one who understands words.

What the fug are you talking about? I wrote this thread and is there anything wrong with it?

Panthro was saying that Kentucky wasn't in the SEC, someone else explained to him that they were obviously, and I said that didn't even say anything about Warford being in the SEC. I guess that could be confusing, but why you gotta derail the thread?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

What the fug are you talking about? I wrote this thread and is there anything wrong with it?

Panthro was saying that Kentucky wasn't in the SEC, someone else explained to him that they were obviously, and I said that didn't even say anything about Warford being in the SEC. I guess that could be confusing, but why you gotta derail the thread?

This is all wrong, you said Warford wasnt SEC, Panthro questioned that because he knew Kentucky was SEC. Sorry for derailing this thread, I was only clarifying that Warford was SEC because you failed to acknowledge that. I didn't want to start a pissing match but when you are like "Duh?" when you are clearly lost I have no choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

the problem is OG is much deeper with quality players than OT.

if we want an OT we will have to take him in the 1st imo.

Fluker and Johnson will not be around in the 2nd imo.

Go OT first then OG 2nd.

thats going to be a yound and inexpierenced oline with amini at LG for his 2nd year

Vet, 2nd year, Vet, Rookie, Rookie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'd love warford in the second, big mauling RG. Would allow us to draft a more premium position in the first round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Duh?

Here you are saying that the fact that Warmack plays in the SEC differentiates himself from Warford, obviously implying that Warford does not play in the SEC;

Maybe give the athleticism edge to Warmack and the fact that he plays in the SEC, but other than that I see two pretty identical prospects.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I totally agree with you. I've been high on Warford for a while, and if we could somehow guarantee we'd get Warford in the 2nd I'd rather have him there than Warmack in the 1st.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

When I compare Warmack and Warford from both tape and when I saw Warmack in person, I can tell you immediately that Warmack is the better athlete. I know he doesn't look it with his big belly and ill fitting jersey, but this guy is scary in person. I honestly would be happy with either and given the fact I believe Warmack will be gone by #14, I wouldn't be angry if we took Warford in the 2nd even though I think Warmack is that much better.

The main difference between the two is athleticism. Warmack is a much better pull blocker and gets to the second level much faster than Warford which would give us a lot of versatility given the pull blocking ability of both Silatolu and Kalil. On the flip side, we don't really need to have a superb athlete at RG, just a guy to create big holes and pass protect for Cam and our running game. Right now Warford is viewed as a late 2nd-early 3rd rounder, but I believe he'll rise to early to mid 2nd. Warford would certainly be the better value if he's available in the 2nd, but overall I could see Warmack as a LG or RG whilst I could only see Warford as a career RG.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

When I compare Warmack and Warford from both tape and when I saw Warmack in person, I can tell you immediately that Warmack is the better athlete. I know he doesn't look it with his big belly and ill fitting jersey, but this guy is scary in person. I honestly would be happy with either and given the fact I believe Warmack will be gone by #14, I wouldn't be angry if we took Warford in the 2nd even though I think Warmack is that much better.

The main difference between the two is athleticism. Warmack is a much better pull blocker and gets to the second level much faster than Warford which would give us a lot of versatility given the pull blocking ability of both Silatolu and Kalil. On the flip side, we don't really need to have a superb athlete at RG, just a guy to create big holes and pass protect for Cam and our running game. Right now Warford is viewed as a late 2nd-early 3rd rounder, but I believe he'll rise to early to mid 2nd. Warford would certainly be the better value if he's available in the 2nd, but overall I could see Warmack as a LG or RG whilst I could only see Warford as a career RG.

I like this evaluation. Warford has a lot of power, but he doesn't have the speed, quickness, nor the fluidity of Warmack. Warford has trouble with quickly executed stunts, he's caught off guard and sometimes doesn't have the quickness to recover. Another problem is his quickness off the snap, sometimes the defender has engaged him before he has gotten into his stance, which leads to him getting beaten. I almost want to say he's out of gas at times and it's causing him to slow down. Warmack is better in pass protection, but in run blocking it's much closer. Slight edge to Warmack in run blocking, but not a huge difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites