Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

New Mock w/ comp picks


  • Please log in to reply
62 replies to this topic

#31 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:21 PM

We draft OT in the 1st Gross is getting cut.


And unless it's Jockel or Fisher. It's not a upgrade.


And having Kali and Bell as your only experience player on the starting is not a upgrade.

#32 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 03:36 PM

And unless it's Jockel or Fisher. It's not a upgrade.


And having Kali and Bell as your only experience player on the starting is not a upgrade.


Johnson at the least is better than Bell.

Warford is better than Hangman

Cobi is def better than Murphy and prob better than Lafel

ect.

#33 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 January 2013 - 04:04 PM

Johnson at the least is better than Bell.

Warford is better than Hangman

Cobi is def better than Murphy and prob better than Lafel

ect.


Everything you've said is based on nothing but your opinion. You do have to give a little leeway in learning to play in the pros. There is no way you can think that having 2 rookies and a 2nd year player starting on our O-line next year is a upgrade. This thinking will put Cam in danger and that is very stupid. IMO

#34 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 04:15 PM

Everything you've said is based on nothing but your opinion. You do have to give a little leeway in learning to play in the pros. There is no way you can think that having 2 rookies and a 2nd year player starting on our O-line next year is a upgrade. This thinking will put Cam in danger and that is very stupid. IMO



Getting a awesome RG and a nice LT prospect is to the detriment of Cam. Rome wasnt built in a day.

But, what ever you say buddy.

#35 TerriblePizza

TerriblePizza

    Bringin dat Gamecock swag

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,221 posts
  • LocationCamden, SC

Posted 22 January 2013 - 04:26 PM

I don't think Worford will make it to us in the middle of the second. He may be a first round pick.

#36 BigSyke

BigSyke

    I Know you Watching me but I'm watching you too Playa...

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,145 posts
  • LocationFLORIDA

Posted 22 January 2013 - 04:36 PM

i keep seeing melvin white listed as 6'3 in height...lol which is it

#37 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 January 2013 - 04:46 PM

Getting a awesome RG and a nice LT prospect is to the detriment of Cam. Rome wasnt built in a day.

But, what ever you say buddy.


Are you that fuging stupid to not understand that you can't expect rookies to come in and know how to play the pro game from day one?

It is completely stupid to think you can add 2 rookies to a Oline that already has 2 player learning how to play. And think you've upgraded your Oline.

Thank god you're not our GM because you will get Cam killed.

#38 CollegePanther

CollegePanther

    President

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,216 posts
  • LocationNorth Carolina

Posted 22 January 2013 - 05:59 PM

Oh boy I really dislike this. You're going to get some bad feedback for Lane Johnson for sure.

And I thought you were done with mocks until the combine lol

Hey Bwood, since you love criticizing everyone elses mock drafts, why don't you create one of your own?

#39 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,491 posts
  • LocationSouthern California

Posted 22 January 2013 - 09:10 PM

Hey Bwood, since you love criticizing everyone elses mock drafts, why don't you create one of your own?


Oh waaaahhh I posted a fantasy mock and Bwood didn't like it!!!

I posted one towards the end of the season with Joeckel as the first pick because we were looking at a top 5 pick. Obviously that isn't realistic now so I usually wait to post my second until the after the combine.

Then I do one before the draft. The way everyone else should, any more than 4 mocks is just ridiculous lol..

#40 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,720 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 09:28 PM

I would not mind him at all with our second rounder, actually he would be perfect to sit behind Gross for one season and then step in. Getting him in the second would leave us with opportunity for Warmack in the first. OLine good and powerful for 8-10 years at that point.

D could be addressed in FA and remainder of draft

#41 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 09:47 PM

Are you that fuging stupid to not understand that you can't expect rookies to come in and know how to play the pro game from day one?

It is completely stupid to think you can add 2 rookies to a Oline that already has 2 player learning how to play. And think you've upgraded your Oline.

Thank god you're not our GM because you will get Cam killed.


OL is one of the easiest places to get immediate impact from rookies. Probably the most easiest.

We might not upgrade the line in year one, but we have certainly upgraded our line going forward with nice young talent.

#42 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 09:50 PM

I would not mind him at all with our second rounder, actually he would be perfect to sit behind Gross for one season and then step in. Getting him in the second would leave us with opportunity for Warmack in the first. OLine good and powerful for 8-10 years at that point.

D could be addressed in FA and remainder of draft


Johnson wont be there in the 2nd. Will most likely be gone halfway through the 1st. Too good of measurables and tape not to.

I like him much better than everyone not named Jokoel and Fisher. Add that to the very deep OG class and we get more bang for the buck going OT 1st and OG 2nd.

My dream scenario would be Warmak in the 1st and Johnson in the 2nd. But that aint happening.

#43 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 January 2013 - 10:16 PM

OL is one of the easiest places to get immediate impact from rookies. Probably the most easiest.

We might not upgrade the line in year one, but we have certainly upgraded our line going forward with nice young talent.


Not when you play them together from the start.

Did you see what happen to Big Ben this year? And he had Better Oline prospects then the ones you picked and want to start from day 1.

#44 Dash Global

Dash Global

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 22 January 2013 - 10:25 PM

Not when you play them together from the start.

Did you see what happen to Big Ben this year? And he had Better Oline prospects then the ones you picked and want to start from day 1.


Cant know for certain. Just because some are higher round / better peospects doesnt mean automatic success just like late round prospects doesnt automatically mean they cant produce.

Crap shoot.

Either way. Johnson and Warford give us great OL prospects going forward.

#45 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • LocationNonya

Posted 22 January 2013 - 10:32 PM

Cant know for certain. Just because some are higher round / better peospects doesnt mean automatic success just like late round prospects doesnt automatically mean they cant produce.

Crap shoot.

Either way. Johnson and Warford give us great OL prospects going forward.



I choose not to play a crap shoot with my Franchise QB health.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com