Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Penetta removes military ban on women in combat


  • Please log in to reply
98 replies to this topic

#11 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,073
  • Reputation: 1,996
HUDDLER

Posted 23 January 2013 - 04:22 PM

Okay, preface this with the fact that I am twice your guys age, but I do not want women in direct battle.

Having a man hostage is bad enough, what will it be to have a woman on camera, black eyes, rape, all that as a hostage. What will the outcry be over this with the public? Not the same as it would be for a man, therefore, you should not do it.

I don't give a rip about equal job, equal pay in this situation. Not for women in direct combat. Fly a jet? Fine, but not this.

#12 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,711
  • Reputation: 2,351
Moderators

Posted 23 January 2013 - 04:23 PM

Clinton was cockslapped by Rand


You mean when he tapped danced on the children of Newtown's graves by calling Benghazi the worst tragedy since 9/11?

Yeah. PWNT

#13 Delhommey

Delhommey

    Moderator

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 12,711
  • Reputation: 2,351
Moderators

Posted 23 January 2013 - 04:27 PM

Okay, preface this with the fact that I am twice your guys age, but I do not want women in direct battle.

Having a man hostage is bad enough, what will it be to have a woman on camera, black eyes, rape,


For a lot of women soliders, that'd be more of the same.

#14 Awesomeness!!

Awesomeness!!

    BangBang

  • Joined: 01-April 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,399
  • Reputation: 1,253
  • LocationArizona
HUDDLER

Posted 23 January 2013 - 04:28 PM

95% of the women in thr military cant go on a ruck without falling out. This is a bad idea..

#15 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,063
  • Reputation: 458
HUDDLER

Posted 23 January 2013 - 04:37 PM

95% of the women in thr military cant go on a ruck without falling out. This is a bad idea..


What's the % of men that fall out.

#16 P.I.A

P.I.A

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 12-October 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 522
  • Reputation: 285
  • LocationFinally Home!
HUDDLER

Posted 23 January 2013 - 04:40 PM

If they want to serve in a combat MOS, then doing more than 19 pushups in 2 minutes should be required. This isn't a male vs female problem this is a standards problem. If they want a mans job, they need to be able to handle a mans requirements, body type be damned. A unit's combat effectiveness will be severly damaged if only 75% of the soldiers can meet the military standard. I sure as heck wont go down range with a woman or man that couldn't meet the basic physical standards. That needs to be the arguement, not whether or not a chick can go 11-B.

#17 P.I.A

P.I.A

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 12-October 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 522
  • Reputation: 285
  • LocationFinally Home!
HUDDLER

Posted 23 January 2013 - 04:48 PM

What's the % of men that fall out.

I think the statement you responded to was pretty much based off of crappy guessing. From what I can tell, there is no study showing "how many soldiers fall out of a forced march."

#18 g5jamz

g5jamz

    Is back

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,063
  • Reputation: 458
HUDDLER

Posted 23 January 2013 - 04:56 PM

I'm just asking because I'm sure the army has an acceptable level of forced march fallouts...but if someone can't do the march, they are a liability and shouldn't make it. Or use them as cannon fodder. I know...we don't do that anymore...but you get the gist.

#19 h0llywood

h0llywood

    I HATE LUKE KUECHLY!

  • Joined: 04-September 12
  • posts: 2,957
  • Reputation: 1,641
  • LocationPasadena, CA
SUPPORTER

Posted 23 January 2013 - 04:57 PM

Here's my 2 cents on all this.

I am all for women in combat roles because I believe in certain situations they can succeed...However

Captain Zoe Bedell who was part of the lawsuit filed against the military was attached to my unit in 2009. She was a young 2nd Lt and obviously lacking in experience.

Let's just say there was an incident where she left Marines behind and was replaced as my Platoon commander (THANK EFFIN GOD!).

She is the wrong person to be the face behind the lawsuit! She claims that restrictions on combat roles limited her advancement. BULL$hit, your incompetence got you replaced for almost having my young Marines killed.

That is all.

#20 Gazi

Gazi

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 07-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,831
  • Reputation: 311
HUDDLER

Posted 23 January 2013 - 05:02 PM

I'm just asking because I'm sure the army has an acceptable level of forced march fallouts...but if someone can't do the march, they are a liability and shouldn't make it. Or use them as cannon fodder. I know...we don't do that anymore...but you get the gist.


You have 4 hours to complete. There are no "acceptable" levels of fallouts. If you can't complete them you are OUT of the Army and can't even be in a combat. If a woman is in combat, she already did her 20k march up to standard. Good?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users