Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Gucci Mane

EJ Manuel - Legit Backup QB Option

46 posts in this topic

Ej a Cam clone? Hardly.

He's a crappy Tony Romo.

It is my most sincere wish that the Falcons, Saints or Bucs burn a high pick on him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember last year at this time when people were debating whether we should take Russell Wilson as a back-up in the 4th or 5th

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember last year at this time when people were debating whether we should take Russell Wilson as a back-up in the 4th or 5th

Remember how Wilson was actually a good QB?

Manuel has physical gifts, but is a terrible decision maker. He decides wrong on half his zone read plays, and helped lose multiple close games by running backwards into a sack, taking the team out of FG range.

Like Romo he makes bad decisions under pressure, and hurts his team by getting cute when the pocket collapses and losing yardage or turning the ball over.

No. No. No.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love to have Manuel in the 4th or 5th. I dont think hes going to be anything more than a backup role QB in the pro, but hes worth a late rounder. Though with so many teams needing a QB, I think he's gone in the 3rd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't waste a draft pick on a backup QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leading up to his bowl game several draftniks were questioning whether he was even a draftable player. Late round at best. I thought they were selling him a bit short personally.

I have the Senior Bowl on DVR but haven't watched it all yet. Is he blowing it up there or something??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Matt Scott is a man. But I don't see him being very good. His arm is too weak, imo. I'd much rather have Manuel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is on chips radar, so he's likely gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is the off-season and winning online competitions is kinda our thing.   Let's see if we can't swing this thing.  The Pats need to go home.  We must fight the Evil League of Evil coalition. 
    •   So are you upset that Hillary lost and we stopped investigating her?  Or that in an alternate reality, Hillary won and no one is talking about Russia?  I'm trying to see your point, but alas, you might be too clever for me. Or are we back to it's not fair to expect Trump NOT to have Russian ties because of business interests?  Again, all Trump had to do was completely break from his companies, and he did not.  And we're seeing some serious Russian interests in Trump winning, and a lot of contact between Trump's campaign officials and advisers, which is good or bad? I'm not sure the point you're trying to make.  Is it "yay, Trump won so we can investigate Russian interference with the election and administration!"  Or is it "Boo, if Hillary won she wouldn't be investigated!" Hillary lost.  People came out for Trump in the rust belt. Now that people are looking at Trump, what he's said, what laws he's trying to pass, etc; a lot of information is coming out.  Is that bad?  Or is it just that the media is being unfair to Trump? Maybe I'm just not smart enough to get it.
    • I highly doubt this will upset anyone, unless they are trolling that is.