Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Panthers Number 5 In NFL Highest Winning Percentage Playoff Teams


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#11 TopCat

TopCat

    Swerve

  • Joined: 25-December 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,176
  • Reputation: 269
HUDDLER

Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:26 PM

Not surprised, whenever we get there we have success. Minus you know what.

#12 neverlosethefeeling

neverlosethefeeling

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,408
  • Reputation: 582
HUDDLER

Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:43 PM

source? this stat seems wrong.

#13 CarolinaCoolin

CarolinaCoolin

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 05-December 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,991
  • Reputation: 1,121
  • LocationMaryland
HUDDLER

Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:02 PM

Is that just playoff games not including Super Bowl games?

#14 panthersphan

panthersphan

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,587
  • Reputation: 154
  • LocationDenver, CO
HUDDLER

Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:12 PM

When we are good, we are really good. When we are not really good, we are below average. Not much gray area. Problem is that we are "below average" much more often than we are "really good".



Actually we're historically more of a 7-9 8-8 9-7 team, which is the definition of mediocrity

#15 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • Joined: 16-March 09
  • posts: 18,501
  • Reputation: 3,467
SUPPORTER

Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:19 PM

This begs the question...Would you prefer to be one and done every year or no playoffs but 1 in every 3/4 years you make the conference title game when you do make it in?


Tough questions. One reason I have PSLs is for the chance at a home payoff game. That's the golden egg for me. I went overseas from 2003 to 2009 so missed 2 of them and then bought at the top of the market in summer 2009. Since then we went 23 and 41.

What I really want is a culture of winning. Every team has down years but some seem to get mired in them. I want the confidence going into any season that we can make a run.

Some teams have it. We don't right now.

#16 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:32 PM

Next year is our year

how long we been saying that?

kind of like predicting the end of the world. eventually someone might be right.

#17 Car123

Car123

    Newton's Law

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,177
  • Reputation: 637
HUDDLER

Posted 29 January 2013 - 06:45 PM

Source

#18 Chimera

Chimera

    Not Bant

  • Joined: 11-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 11,708
  • Reputation: 2,645
HUDDLER

Posted 29 January 2013 - 07:29 PM

Actually we're historically more of a 7-9 8-8 9-7 team, which is the definition of mediocrity


Actually we've never been 9-7.

And people asking for the source... We were 6-2 postseason at one point (a .750 winning pct - in first place by a huge margin). We've lost our last two postseason games. I'll break it down for you:
1996: beat cowboys, lost to packers
2003: beat cowboys, rams, eagles; lost to patriots
2005: beat giants, bears, lost to seahawks
2008: lost to cardinals.

#19 Guest_Irv_*

Guest_Irv_*
Guests

Posted 29 January 2013 - 07:48 PM

still waiting on a source or link or something

#20 neverlosethefeeling

neverlosethefeeling

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,408
  • Reputation: 582
HUDDLER

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:09 AM

Actually we've never been 9-7.

And people asking for the source... We were 6-2 postseason at one point (a .750 winning pct - in first place by a huge margin). We've lost our last two postseason games. I'll break it down for you:
1996: beat cowboys, lost to packers
2003: beat cowboys, rams, eagles; lost to patriots
2005: beat giants, bears, lost to seahawks
2008: lost to cardinals.


The wording "Most Winning" in the title was confusing. I thought "most winning" meant "won the most number of games" not "won the highest percentage of games." So when I asked for a source, I was thinking both the Giants and Patriots off the top of my head have a higher number of wins than the Panthers and should therefore be ranked higher.

All clear now?


Edit: spelling


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users