Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Panthers Number 5 In NFL Highest Winning Percentage Playoff Teams


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#16 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Moderators
  • -29,170 posts

Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:32 PM

Next year is our year

how long we been saying that?

kind of like predicting the end of the world. eventually someone might be right.

#17 Car123

Car123

    Newton's Law

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 29 January 2013 - 06:45 PM

Source

#18 Chimera

Chimera

    Membrane

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,226 posts

Posted 29 January 2013 - 07:29 PM

Actually we're historically more of a 7-9 8-8 9-7 team, which is the definition of mediocrity


Actually we've never been 9-7.

And people asking for the source... We were 6-2 postseason at one point (a .750 winning pct - in first place by a huge margin). We've lost our last two postseason games. I'll break it down for you:
1996: beat cowboys, lost to packers
2003: beat cowboys, rams, eagles; lost to patriots
2005: beat giants, bears, lost to seahawks
2008: lost to cardinals.

#19 Irv

Irv

    Winner Best New Huddler

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,679 posts

Posted 29 January 2013 - 07:48 PM

still waiting on a source or link or something

#20 neverlosethefeeling

neverlosethefeeling

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,383 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:09 AM

Actually we've never been 9-7.

And people asking for the source... We were 6-2 postseason at one point (a .750 winning pct - in first place by a huge margin). We've lost our last two postseason games. I'll break it down for you:
1996: beat cowboys, lost to packers
2003: beat cowboys, rams, eagles; lost to patriots
2005: beat giants, bears, lost to seahawks
2008: lost to cardinals.


The wording "Most Winning" in the title was confusing. I thought "most winning" meant "won the most number of games" not "won the highest percentage of games." So when I asked for a source, I was thinking both the Giants and Patriots off the top of my head have a higher number of wins than the Panthers and should therefore be ranked higher.

All clear now?


Edit: spelling

#21 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,738 posts
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:16 AM

Yes, it should be the highest winning percentage. Pro Football HOF link

#22 iampantherman

iampantherman

    Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 317 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 11:23 AM

We also have the highest winning percentage all-time for teams within the NFC South.(I know, I know.....lipstick, meet pig.)

Attached File  alltimeWLpct.jpg   72.23KB   11 downloads

#23 ThunderKatt

ThunderKatt

    Hello to All my Haters

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,073 posts
  • LocationIn yo moma

Posted 30 January 2013 - 11:32 AM

This stat is mainly due to Foxy baby, how ironic is that?

#24 Keith Moons Liver

Keith Moons Liver

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,650 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 12:57 PM

who cares
i'd rather go 0-1 in the playoffs than 0-0 like we usually do

#25 Salvo

Salvo

    BEWB

  • ALL-PRO
  • 913 posts
  • LocationColorado

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:02 PM

Just tells me that when we get into the playoffs, we can hold our own.

But getting to the playoffs is a completely different animal. One has to come before the other.

It's a moot point, otherwise.

#26 Brooklyn Bully

Brooklyn Bully

    Sell it, Jerry

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,457 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:25 PM

Percentages... lol. What'd be funny is if a team who has never been to the Playoffs won their first game, then the world exploded. At 1-0, they'd lead the list!!!!! :derp:

#27 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • ALL-PRO
  • 18,218 posts

Posted 30 January 2013 - 02:44 PM

We also have the highest winning percentage all-time for teams within the NFC South.(I know, I know.....lipstick, meet pig.)

Attached File  alltimeWLpct.jpg   72.23KB   11 downloads


One thing that helped that is the strength given to us as a new Franchise. We were able to compete out of the gate which was historically not the case for other expansion teams. All those teams stunk for a long time after forming.

I wonder what the list would look like if we did 1995 and subsequent.

The NFCS is one of the toughest divisions now obv.

#28 KaseKlosed

KaseKlosed

    @CMackMost

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,153 posts

Posted 31 January 2013 - 01:39 AM

It's a good stat but also a little lipstick on a pig

why are you so negative?

#29 Happy Panther

Happy Panther

    Now even funnier.

  • ALL-PRO
  • 18,218 posts

Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:42 AM

why are you so negative?


realistic.

It's a great stat.

We are not a great franchise.

#30 CBDellinger

CBDellinger

    CAMdamonium!

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 790 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:07 AM

When we are good, we are really good. When we are not really good, we are below average. Not much gray area. Problem is that we are "below average" much more often than we are "really good".



Actually we are more or less average than anything else.

lots of 7-9, 8-8 records.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com