Scouts' future uncertain if ban on gays is dropped
#1
Posted 29 January 2013 - 10:57 PM
Will the Scouts now be split between troops with gay-friendly policies and those that keep the ban? What will a National Jamboree be like if it brings together these disparate groups with conflicting ideologies? Will the churches long devoted to scouting now be torn by internal debate over the choices that may lie ahead? A top official of the Southern Baptist Convention, whose conservative churches sponsor hundreds of Scout units that embrace the ban, was among those alarmed that the BSA is proposing to allow sponsoring organizations to decide for themselves whether to admit gays as scouts and adult leaders.
"We understand that we are now a minority, that it is not popular to have biblical values, not popular to take stands that seem intolerant," said Frank Page, president of the SBC's executive committee. "This is going to lead to a disintegration of faith-based values."
In North Carolina, news of the possible policy change was welcomed — cautiously — by Matt Comer of Charlotte, who said he was forced out of his Boy Scout troop at the age of 14 after troop leaders confronted him over being gay.
"It was very intimidating," said Comer, now 26. "The scoutmaster said, 'If you choose to live that lifestyle, you choose not to be a Boy Scout.'"
"I lost a lot of good friends when I had to leave," Comer said. "I really did enjoy Scouts. I wanted to get my Eagle Scout and go on to be a Scout leader."
Now, he has mixed views about the proposed change, and anticipates there could be problems when troops with different stances mingle at jamborees and summer camps. http://news.msn.com/...gays-is-dropped
#2
Posted 29 January 2013 - 11:02 PM
"We understand that we are now a minority, that it is not popular to have biblical values, not popular to take stands that seem intolerant," said Frank Page, president of the SBC's executive committee. "This is going to lead to a disintegration of faith-based values."
poor homophobe
#3
Posted 29 January 2013 - 11:03 PM
Good for them though if they drop the ban.
#4
Posted 29 January 2013 - 11:47 PM
And while I support my churches decision as it aligns with my beliefs and morals I couldn't help but think we were stooping to the scouts level of exclusion by turning them away.
#5
Posted 30 January 2013 - 12:22 AM
#6
Posted 30 January 2013 - 01:31 AM
#7
Posted 30 January 2013 - 02:55 AM
#8
Posted 30 January 2013 - 03:16 AM
#10
Posted 30 January 2013 - 09:17 AM
#11
Posted 30 January 2013 - 09:55 AM
#12
Posted 30 January 2013 - 10:07 AM
#13
Posted 30 January 2013 - 10:58 AM
Turned them away how, Panthro? Did you bar individuals, or just the organization? If your church has banned anyone involved in the Boy Scouts, that's... extreme, I think. but if instead, your church refuses to deal with the organization itself, that is quite a bit different from what the Boy Scouts are doing, IMO. I don't think anyone is asking the Boy Scouts to organization to organize gay rights protests and the like (not that I would object), but exclusion of the individual for things out of his control is really unfair, I think.
They wanted to pay us to use our church for meetings. We told them basically thanks but no thanks...
#14
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:08 PM
#15
Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:05 PM
The leaders are afraid mostly because all the guys with gaydar will be in their meetings and uncover the "secret" concerning their fetish for dressing in uniforms that include neckerchiefs surrounded by young boys wanting them to take them camping.
I certainly hope this is a joke.
I am an Eagle, and honestly I don't know enough about the situation to chime in. Can someone please paraphrase what is going on?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





