Breakdown of salaries by position... aka a fancy pants chart
#1
Posted 30 January 2013 - 06:51 PM
#2
Posted 30 January 2013 - 06:58 PM
#3
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:01 PM
Well, that and how we spend more on RBs than OTs.
#4
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:07 PM
Tackles must be worth their weight in Gold.
#5
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:07 PM
#6
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:19 PM
#7
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:21 PM
#8
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:21 PM
#9
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:21 PM
#10
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:28 PM
#11
Posted 30 January 2013 - 09:36 PM
#12
Posted 31 January 2013 - 01:39 AM
Doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between amount spent and results obtained.
#13
Posted 31 January 2013 - 01:51 AM
Some teams spent a ton of money for crappy ST results. Baltimore was ranked number 1 by football outsiders and spent 3.1 million. We ranked 29th and spent 1.4 million. Who was right there with us? Oakland at 28th spend 10.9 million. What did San Frans 7.5 millions net them?? 20th place......
Doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between amount spent and results obtained.
Oakland's money is tied up in Janikowski and Lechler. They are easily the best kicker/punter duo in the NFL. So the rankings might not tell the whole story there.
#14
Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:07 AM
#15
Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:22 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





