Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Breakdown of salaries by position... aka a fancy pants chart

16 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/interactive/2013/jan/30/nfl-salaries-team-position#carolina-panthers,carolina-panthers

some things jump out at you. others don't.

please, discuss.
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

While I struggle to buy TP!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

That's an interesting collection of charts. The only thing that really jumps out at me is how we spend the second least on ST heh. I assume that just means K and P.

Well, that and how we spend more on RBs than OTs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

If that is right then we might not be as bad off as believed on Salary Cap.
Tackles must be worth their weight in Gold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Those safety and guard circles are awful small. hmm....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Dat LB Corps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

We spent less on ST than any team in the NFL....results shouldn't surprise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

We spent less on ST than any team in the NFL....results shouldn't surprise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

We spent less on ST than any team in the NFL....results shouldn't surprise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Nakamura, Gamble, Murphy, and Anderson for sure got to go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Great chart. Not a lot of new info other than the obvious aberration on ST. Thanks for sharing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Some teams spent a ton of money for crappy ST results. Baltimore was ranked number 1 by football outsiders and spent 3.1 million. We ranked 29th and spent 1.4 million. Who was right there with us? Oakland at 28th spend 10.9 million. What did San Frans 7.5 millions net them?? 20th place......
Doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between amount spent and results obtained.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='panthers55' timestamp='1359614370' post='2119878']
Some teams spent a ton of money for crappy ST results. Baltimore was ranked number 1 by football outsiders and spent 3.1 million. We ranked 29th and spent 1.4 million. Who was right there with us? Oakland at 28th spend 10.9 million. What did San Frans 7.5 millions net them?? 20th place......
Doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between amount spent and results obtained.
[/quote]

Oakland's money is tied up in Janikowski and Lechler. They are easily the best kicker/punter duo in the NFL. So the rankings might not tell the whole story there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

We have way too much money tied up in RB's that cant run the ball up the middle because we don't have enough money to pay some good Guards to open holes for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I wonder what defines their defensive and offensive rankings. NE is 27th on defense and 17th on offense. I recall them being much stronger..The Lions are also ranked 1st overall..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Nice Find OP.

Did anyone here realize our we spent more money on Corner's, than running backs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites