Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Breakdown of salaries by position... aka a fancy pants chart


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
15 replies to this topic

#1 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    Literally Can't Even

  • Joined: 27-October 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,296
  • Reputation: 2,074
HUDDLER

Posted 30 January 2013 - 06:51 PM

http://www.guardian....rolina-panthers

some things jump out at you. others don't.

please, discuss.

#2 DC Amp

DC Amp

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 25-December 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,506
  • Reputation: 214
HUDDLER

Posted 30 January 2013 - 06:58 PM

While I struggle to buy TP!

#3 JawnyBlaze

JawnyBlaze

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-May 10
  • posts: 7,695
  • Reputation: 2,063
SUPPORTER

Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:01 PM

That's an interesting collection of charts. The only thing that really jumps out at me is how we spend the second least on ST heh. I assume that just means K and P.

Well, that and how we spend more on RBs than OTs.

#4 Catweisers

Catweisers

    Catweisers

  • Joined: 29-December 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 455
  • Reputation: 58
HUDDLER

Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:07 PM

If that is right then we might not be as bad off as believed on Salary Cap.
Tackles must be worth their weight in Gold.

#5 panthers90

panthers90

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 22-November 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,274
  • Reputation: 496
HUDDLER

Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:07 PM

Those safety and guard circles are awful small. hmm....

#6 Argus Plexus

Argus Plexus

    Super Kami Guru

  • Joined: 13-September 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,809
  • Reputation: 849
HUDDLER

Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:19 PM

Dat LB Corps

#7 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:21 PM

We spent less on ST than any team in the NFL....results shouldn't surprise

#8 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:21 PM

We spent less on ST than any team in the NFL....results shouldn't surprise

#9 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:21 PM

We spent less on ST than any team in the NFL....results shouldn't surprise

#10 Gin and Juice

Gin and Juice

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,801
  • Reputation: 430
HUDDLER

Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:28 PM

Nakamura, Gamble, Murphy, and Anderson for sure got to go

#11 Marguide

Marguide

    South of the Border

  • Joined: 13-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,751
  • Reputation: 2,345
HUDDLER

Posted 30 January 2013 - 09:36 PM

Great chart. Not a lot of new info other than the obvious aberration on ST. Thanks for sharing.

#12 panthers55

panthers55

    Starting all over again

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,652
  • Reputation: 2,299
HUDDLER

Posted 31 January 2013 - 01:39 AM

Some teams spent a ton of money for crappy ST results. Baltimore was ranked number 1 by football outsiders and spent 3.1 million. We ranked 29th and spent 1.4 million. Who was right there with us? Oakland at 28th spend 10.9 million. What did San Frans 7.5 millions net them?? 20th place......
Doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between amount spent and results obtained.