Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Cracka McNasty

Breakdown of salaries by position... aka a fancy pants chart

16 posts in this topic

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/interactive/2013/jan/30/nfl-salaries-team-position#carolina-panthers,carolina-panthers

some things jump out at you. others don't.

please, discuss.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


That's an interesting collection of charts. The only thing that really jumps out at me is how we spend the second least on ST heh. I assume that just means K and P.

Well, that and how we spend more on RBs than OTs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If that is right then we might not be as bad off as believed on Salary Cap.

Tackles must be worth their weight in Gold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those safety and guard circles are awful small. hmm....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We spent less on ST than any team in the NFL....results shouldn't surprise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We spent less on ST than any team in the NFL....results shouldn't surprise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We spent less on ST than any team in the NFL....results shouldn't surprise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great chart. Not a lot of new info other than the obvious aberration on ST. Thanks for sharing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some teams spent a ton of money for crappy ST results. Baltimore was ranked number 1 by football outsiders and spent 3.1 million. We ranked 29th and spent 1.4 million. Who was right there with us? Oakland at 28th spend 10.9 million. What did San Frans 7.5 millions net them?? 20th place......

Doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between amount spent and results obtained.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites