Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Breakdown of salaries by position... aka a fancy pants chart


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
15 replies to this topic

#13 AvatarBlock

AvatarBlock

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 15-October 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 166
  • Reputation: 61
HUDDLER

Posted 31 January 2013 - 01:51 AM

Some teams spent a ton of money for crappy ST results. Baltimore was ranked number 1 by football outsiders and spent 3.1 million. We ranked 29th and spent 1.4 million. Who was right there with us? Oakland at 28th spend 10.9 million. What did San Frans 7.5 millions net them?? 20th place......
Doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between amount spent and results obtained.


Oakland's money is tied up in Janikowski and Lechler. They are easily the best kicker/punter duo in the NFL. So the rankings might not tell the whole story there.

#14 ncsu12engr

ncsu12engr

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 24-April 12
  • posts: 287
  • Reputation: 85
SUPPORTER

Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:07 AM

We have way too much money tied up in RB's that cant run the ball up the middle because we don't have enough money to pay some good Guards to open holes for them.

#15 Doughboy88

Doughboy88

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 05-September 11
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 108
  • Reputation: 32
HUDDLER

Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:22 AM

I wonder what defines their defensive and offensive rankings. NE is 27th on defense and 17th on offense. I recall them being much stronger..The Lions are also ranked 1st overall..

#16 panther4life

panther4life

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,655
  • Reputation: 1,181
HUDDLER

Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:50 AM

Nice Find OP.

Did anyone here realize our we spent more money on Corner's, than running backs?