Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Post in this thread if you want to read and contribute to a thoughtful (if exhaustive) treatise on race and leadership in football


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#31 Hawk

Hawk

    Banned

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 15,399
  • Reputation: 1,894
Moderators

Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:03 PM

I think lots of people share your opinion BlueBoy...I just can't see the entire NFL sharing it...especially when winning is so important...breaking the mold would be worth it.

#32 Hawk

Hawk

    Banned

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 15,399
  • Reputation: 1,894
Moderators

Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:08 PM

thanks for the clarification Philly.

#33 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 8,988
  • Reputation: 4,853
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:36 PM

jesus Philly...if I was in your bar I would have been helping myself to the top shelf waiting for you to type all that out man!! Good post though...and ya...I want to be involved in a conversation that doesn't jump automatically to being accused of being racist.

I live in Canada. Compared to most US places, we don't really have very many black people in these parts. Lots of Asians, Indians..both kinds, lots of people from all over the world to be honest as that's what Canada is all about...not aboot, about! I don't consider myself a racist even in the slightest bit. Just wanted to get that out of the way first.

We all joke about Asians being the great mathmeticians of the world. Maybe it's in their DNA or their education...damned if I know. What's my point...I wasn't sure if I had to have one....no, I remember years ago a sportscaster getting in major crap because he said blacks were dominating in the running events at the Olympics I think it was because as he put it, their muscles were developed differently and they had a different muscle in their leg that made them run faster. Do I believe this...no, probably not, but it could be I suppose.

I guess my question, which won't be well liked by some, is that...I am wondering if there is a chance that certain races are just wired differently, that their minds are just programmed to do different things. Being a coach makes you think of things differently than being a fisherman or a nuclear physicist etc etc etc. damned if I know.

tldr...I know...I'm going back to sleep



Personally, I believe we are all born a blank slate (the Tabula Rasa) and our life experience write our personality. I think of genetics as soft spots in that slate, spots we have a predisposition to falter or succeed. If you were to take the majority of athletes- Black, White, Asian, etc....and insert them into the Manning household growing up they would come out more articulate and well mannered. Put them in that house from the day they are born. I read an article once that said poor African American children hear 5 million fewer words spoken by the time they reach Kindergarten. That is our children learning communication skills right there. That isn't genetics, it's societal.

#34 Guest_BlueBoy_*

Guest_BlueBoy_*
Guests

Posted 01 February 2013 - 01:09 PM

I think lots of people share your opinion BlueBoy...I just can't see the entire NFL sharing it...especially when winning is so important...breaking the mold would be worth it.

I don't think the NFL is culpable at all. In fact, the NFL is a very tolerant organization. The problem is with the journalists, to satiate the demand of the majority they tend stoop to such level of imbecility and intolerant childishness.

People assume the reason the quarterback positions were mostly white is because of their so-called intangibles. But in reality, as Kurt Warner stated, it's because the QB position is the least athletic position on the field. Athletic players in the past use look up to the Jerry Rices, Simpsons, Bo, Moss, etc. so they grew to think that QBs were too soft and nonathletic. Most people don't realize that QBs are just the coaches' messengers, more like teacher's pet. QB and leadership is just a persona.

Some people actually think those 10+ year vets with wives and kids and all their dignity to uphold are gonna listen to a rookie like Luck proclaiming he is their leader. Rrright! And remember, a QB and WR, RB, TE, etc all have the same status. The QB can't fire other players, so why would they take his crap. You think those vets need to be led to play football? Even the notion is funny. "Just call the goddamn play so you can look good at the press conference", that summarize all a QB is.

You think Steve Smith needs to be led to catch the damn ball? Heck, Terrell Owens ate QBs for lunch. Boy, the public is stupid!

Speaking of Luck, I think he is the least eloquent of all the young QBs and the least abilities and we'll see that in a couple more years.

#35 pstall

pstall

    Gazebo Effect

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 23,152
  • Reputation: 2,955
  • LocationMontford
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 01:48 PM

it will be liberating for most of you guys when you reach 40. the things you use to sweat will be so comical.

we all grow up or grow old. we all learn our lessons and the ones we don't, we stay in class until we do.

#36 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 19,922
  • Reputation: 5,445
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 02:03 PM

Personally, I believe we are all born a blank slate (the Tabula Rasa) and our life experience write our personality. I think of genetics as soft spots in that slate, spots we have a predisposition to falter or succeed. If you were to take the majority of athletes- Black, White, Asian, etc....and insert them into the Manning household growing up they would come out more articulate and well mannered. Put them in that house from the day they are born. I read an article once that said poor African American children hear 5 million fewer words spoken by the time they reach Kindergarten. That is our children learning communication skills right there. That isn't genetics, it's societal.


I think you are very accurate on your statements.

There are genetic differences in us all. Some have a predisposition to be a better athlete and I Di believe that done are predisposed to be leaders. However, I also agree that the majority if the reason is societal. Your experiences build who you are likely to become.

There are always exceptions to these rules, but they are exactly that....exceptions and not the rule.

#37 Guest_BlueBoy_*

Guest_BlueBoy_*
Guests

Posted 01 February 2013 - 02:12 PM

Personally, I believe we are all born a blank slate (the Tabula Rasa) and our life experience write our personality. I think of genetics as soft spots in that slate, spots we have a predisposition to falter or succeed. If you were to take the majority of athletes- Black, White, Asian, etc....and insert them into the Manning household growing up they would come out more articulate and well mannered. Put them in that house from the day they are born. I read an article once that said poor African American children hear 5 million fewer words spoken by the time they reach Kindergarten. That is our children learning communication skills right there. That isn't genetics, it's societal.

Those debates are great. But what I seem to notice in all those debate is that people of African decent seem to be the center of all those 'debates'. What is so 'interesting' about Africans that people want to 'debate' about. Why not Mexicans or Asians? Because Africans are a mere 'minority' compared to all those other combined minorities. Also, why aren't Asians or Mexicans asking those questions or begging to be 'different'? Many Africans would beg to ask, why not analyze yourself and stop worrying about them? If you think you're so different, then enjoy a prosperous 'different' existence. And I repeat, how would you feel like if someone is always pointing their dirty, filthy fingers at you.

Now, regarding the debate of whether we're are all the same. Are we all the 'same'? I don't know the answer to that, but from what I have learned so far from our science is that we've all been affected by different environmental factors dating back to tens of thousands of years. We know Europeans and Asians lived in arctic environments while Africans lived mostly in tropical environments. Most scientist believe that had a strong effect on our physical difference. Scientist also believed that non-Africans went through a hybridization process with other non-'human' species. Again, did that have any effect on our physical differences? And to all those who begs to be 'different', well the answer is right in front of you. It seems to be the case. DNA research is in its infancy so we will find out more specifics later on.

The even tougher question, are you we satisfied with the level of 'difference'? In the lottery of being 'different', who is the winner and who is the loser? Interesting, eh!

Regarding the article stating poor African children hear 5 million less words by the time they reach kindergarden, well, that's bullpoo, there aren't 5 millions words in the English language. That's actually funny, I wanna meet a kindergarden kid who knows 200 words. Again, packing poo up to sell to the common idiots.


How many words are there in the English language?


"The Second Edition of the 20-volume Oxford English Dictionary contains full entries for 171,476 words in current use, and 47,156 obsolete words. To this may be added around 9,500 derivative words included as subentries. Over half of these words are nouns, about a quarter adjectives, and about a seventh verbs; the rest is made up of exclamations, conjunctions, prepositions, suffixes, etc. And these figures don't take account of entries with senses for different word classes (such as noun and adjective)."

#38 TheRumGone

TheRumGone

    mountain man

  • Joined: 06-December 12
  • posts: 11,398
  • Reputation: 9,259
  • LocationAsheville, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 02:13 PM

I have a friend who is mixed race. Irish and African. We are pretty close and he told me one time, with several shots of whiskey mind you, that it was pretty rough growing up cause he felt he had to act and communicate a certain way around certain people. He felt he had to act more black around black people and more white around white people for both races to like him. I found this really interesting and sad.

#39 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,838
  • Reputation: 13,370
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 02:30 PM

Nice post, Phil. One criticism: "Treatise" is spelled with an 'e'.

For me, I won't go with anthropology. I'll go with anecdote.

I've mentioned before that my father was a rabid racist. He was also never around when I was a kid. Not because he was a deadbeat; just the opposite, he was always working. However, the upshot of that is that my dad wasn't that large an influence on me as a kid. The two people who were, my mom and my pastor, had not a racist bone in their bodies.

Now I came from a mostly white small town. The first time I actually met a black person, they were a pee wee football teammate. They also happened to be female. Honestly, I didn't like her, but not because she was black. It was because she was a wench.

A year later, I got a new black teammate, her little brother Antony. He and I became friends and remained both friends and football teammates all the way through high school. He even rode back and forth with me to practice, and we had a lot of fun on those rides.

Others came along later. A family moved from Africa - not sure which country - with two daughters who were around my age (how one journeys from Africa to West Virginia is a topic I've pondered often since). Later still, another family with a daughter moved in and she started dating a friend of mine. Another buddy made a big deal about it being okay. I pointed out to him that nobody said it wasn't, so he was arguing a point no one was making. Little did I know that would be good practice for internet message boards :unsure:

Still more friends came along when I went to college, including a close friend named Daniel who is, to this day, one of the smartest people I've ever met in person. My college dating life included some flirtations with girls of several ethnic backgrounds as well.

All of the above was a source of great disappointment to my father :(

Bottom line for me though: What I came to learn was that there were a lot more differences in communication stemming from where and how people grew up than there was their race. I also learned to judge people as individuals, not based on whatever ethnic group they came from. Every race has its good, its bad, its geniuses, its morons, its hateful, and its kindhearted.

Likewise, individual football players you judge on their abilities, for good or bad, not their race.

The one criticism I have, and have had for a while, is that college football tends to do a poor job of training athletic QBs (both black and white, but mostly black) to be the kind of passers they need to be at the pro level. So is there an imbalance in the pros? if so, it starts at the college level.

You want to fix the problems? Fix them at the source.

#40 King Taharqa

King Taharqa

    The Panthers Quarterback

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,774
  • Reputation: 322
  • LocationBobcat Country
HUDDLER

Posted 01 February 2013 - 02:43 PM

all those those qbs have white girlfriends.....is that the problem with cam or no???


It helps make you look more "conformed" in some peoples eyes.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users