Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

DaCityKats

2013 mock offseason trades

318 posts in this topic

Denver looking looking to trade up. Will trade whole draft.

Or give me Koppen and whole draft and we'll talk again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deal.

I'll get back to you tonight.

I'm still at school.

Message you later

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Denver trades picks 1.28, 2.26, 4.28, 5.28, 6.28, 7.28 and Dan Koppen to the Chiefs for the number 1 pick in the draft.

We're a play maker away from the SB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Denver trades picks 1.28, 2.26, 4.28, 5.28, 6.28, 7.28 and Dan Koppen to the Chiefs for the number 1 pick in the draft.

We're a play maker away from the SB.

Confirm!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ck what you're getting in points vs what you gave up in the nfl draft value chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Denver trades picks 1.28, 2.26, 4.28, 5.28, 6.28, 7.28 and Dan Koppen to the Chiefs for the number 1 pick in the draft.

We're a play maker away from the SB.

Confirm!

denied. #s are no where to being close. you would have to get multiple future 1st round picks to move that far up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

denied. #s are no where to being close. you would have to get multiple future 1st round picks to move that far up.

Man I swear. Did you include Koppen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ck what you're getting in points vs what you gave up in the nfl draft value chart.

I dnt care. I have specific players I'm targeting !!!! My players are gonna be there at 28.

I have my philosophy. I swear DCK only doing this bc it's me!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is the off-season and winning online competitions is kinda our thing.   Let's see if we can't swing this thing.  The Pats need to go home.  We must fight the Evil League of Evil coalition. 
    •   So are you upset that Hillary lost and we stopped investigating her?  Or that in an alternate reality, Hillary won and no one is talking about Russia?  I'm trying to see your point, but alas, you might be too clever for me. Or are we back to it's not fair to expect Trump NOT to have Russian ties because of business interests?  Again, all Trump had to do was completely break from his companies, and he did not.  And we're seeing some serious Russian interests in Trump winning, and a lot of contact between Trump's campaign officials and advisers, which is good or bad? I'm not sure the point you're trying to make.  Is it "yay, Trump won so we can investigate Russian interference with the election and administration!"  Or is it "Boo, if Hillary won she wouldn't be investigated!" Hillary lost.  People came out for Trump in the rust belt. Now that people are looking at Trump, what he's said, what laws he's trying to pass, etc; a lot of information is coming out.  Is that bad?  Or is it just that the media is being unfair to Trump? Maybe I'm just not smart enough to get it.
    • I highly doubt this will upset anyone, unless they are trolling that is.