Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

49ers outgained Ravens 182-93 (6.3-2.7 ypc) on the ground

45 posts in this topic

Posted

So if the 49ers didn't lose the game (by 3 points btw), the running game would be vital towards getting a Lombardi and this team would "be on the right page"?

Every offense has a formula. Of course it's going to look awful when a team doesn't win games with it. It's silly to think that the Super Bowl-winning formula is the only formula capable of being successful. Saying the running game doesn't matter because the Ravens won without it, would be like saying that 109-yard kickoff returns are necessary to win next year's Super Bowl. Just because the Ravens won the championship doesn't mean they did everything perfectly and our team should just copy their gameplan like sheep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

did john fox have a brain re-wiring factory he dropped so many of you morons into where you were convinced running the ball = winning and could not be dissuaded?

because it's literally impossible to deprogram your bugged minds, even after so much contradictory evidence against you.

oh and.....

morons huh? so sorry, but do I know you? do you think your high and mighty attitude around here goes unnoticed? same arrogant posting, sad mf ... you call us morons. where the fug is your crown?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

cultclassiccat is getting so butthurt over this.

I have stats to backup my side of the argument, you have a poo ton of "what-if" mania going on in your posts. What's arrogant is not calling you guys morons, it's pretty much a response to your own arrogance. Why the fug should anybody agree with you for saying you think if they just ran the ball at the goal line they would've won, when I'm piling on stats that back up the fact that running the ball is not as important as people make it seem on the forum?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So if the 49ers didn't lose the game (by 3 points btw), the running game would be vital towards getting a Lombardi and this team would "be on the right page"?

Every offense has a formula. Of course it's going to look awful when a team doesn't win games with it. It's silly to think that the Super Bowl-winning formula is the only formula capable of being successful.

The Panthers selling out to the read-option offense this past year cost us.

Just because the Ravens won the championship doesn't mean they did everything perfectly and our team should just copy their gameplan like sheep.

their franchise model is world's better than ours and has been for years, so yea taking a few pages from their book would help

Saying the running game doesn't matter because the Ravens won without it, would be like saying that 109-yard kickoff returns are necessary to win next year's Super Bowl.

this would actually be more accurately analogous to saying that good special teams helps a lot, and if not for a bunch of special teams gaffes on the Ravens' part against the Broncos several weeks ago that game would not have made it to overtime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

if you cant see that your argument is one sided and doesnt include a new variable, that is the mobile qb, then you sir are the moron.

a long overdue block in 3....2.....1......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

35 years old and he still can't take it when someone calls him a moron

go ahead and press that block button nancy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

35 years old and he still can't take it when someone calls him a moron

go ahead and press that block button nancy

listen up. your god almightyness is laughable, so are your witty name calling attempts. i point out a flaw in your STATS and you cant come up with a logical retort and have to do what other grownups such as yourself do and call people morons and nancys. yes, im actually tired of reading your posts, sorry if that hurts your e-boy ego.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

no cultclassiccat don't block me, keep enlightening me on this new concept of the "mobile qb" which has been around for at least 20 years

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The 49ers also turned it over twice while Baltimore only turned it over once, SF was only 22% on 3rd down while Baltimore was 55%, SF was 33% inside the 20 while Baltimore was 50%, SF had 150% more penalties, and SF gave up that ludicrous return touchdown. You're cherry-picking a stat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

i get your premise mister love. the rules in the nfl favor a passing game. running the football will still be important but you dont have to be #1 rushing to be successful. and you definitely dont need 2 first round picks to run the ball!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

i think honestly we need to do like the giants and falcons and get our young qb some more weapons outside. we cant keep trying to hide our qbs behind a strong run game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Ravens were ranked a modest 11th while the Niners ranked 4th in the league in 2012

Last year the Giants ranked 32nd in the rushing yards

The year before the Packers ranked 24th

...keep telling me you need to dominate on the ground to win the game guys

Obviously dominating in the ground game makes you lose. Now I understand thabks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites