Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

49ers outgained Ravens 182-93 (6.3-2.7 ypc) on the ground


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

#11 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,942
  • Reputation: 5,486
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:07 AM

so seeing as how you think it would've taken only four plays for the niners to win the game (or just one running play lol), do you think the ravens would've handed it off to kill the remaining time in the fourth quarter with a 2 point deficit?

then we can definitely say play calling cost the Ravens the game in that case

#12 cultclassiccat

cultclassiccat

    flash

  • Joined: 18-March 12
  • posts: 1,742
  • Reputation: 375
  • LocationG spot
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:28 AM

so seeing as how you think it would've taken only four plays for the niners to win the game (or just one running play lol), do you think the ravens would've handed it off to kill the remaining time in the fourth quarter with a 2 point deficit?

then we can definitely say play calling cost the Ravens the game in that case

Mister I Know Everything, your theory doesnt apply to the new style of O thats being run with the up and coming teams in the NFL. Im sorry im not buying into your groundbreaking theory. Do we need to lead the league in rushing, no but it helps. Do we have to pass, yes and mixing it up like the 9rs, Hawks, Skins doesnt sound like a bad idea.

And yes, I think if they would have run four plays in those goaline downs, they score. So, to me, play calling certainly cost them the lead and then the focus is on the defense and this awsome thread is mute.

#13 megadeth078

megadeth078

    hate hate hate

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,067
  • Reputation: 683
  • LocationTexas
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:38 AM

So if the 49ers didn't lose the game (by 3 points btw), the running game would be vital towards getting a Lombardi and this team would "be on the right page"?

Every offense has a formula. Of course it's going to look awful when a team doesn't win games with it. It's silly to think that the Super Bowl-winning formula is the only formula capable of being successful. Saying the running game doesn't matter because the Ravens won without it, would be like saying that 109-yard kickoff returns are necessary to win next year's Super Bowl. Just because the Ravens won the championship doesn't mean they did everything perfectly and our team should just copy their gameplan like sheep.

#14 cultclassiccat

cultclassiccat

    flash

  • Joined: 18-March 12
  • posts: 1,742
  • Reputation: 375
  • LocationG spot
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:01 AM

did john fox have a brain re-wiring factory he dropped so many of you morons into where you were convinced running the ball = winning and could not be dissuaded?

because it's literally impossible to deprogram your bugged minds, even after so much contradictory evidence against you.

oh and.....

morons huh? so sorry, but do I know you? do you think your high and mighty attitude around here goes unnoticed? same arrogant posting, sad mf ... you call us morons. where the fug is your crown?

#15 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,942
  • Reputation: 5,486
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:04 AM

cultclassiccat is getting so butthurt over this.

I have stats to backup my side of the argument, you have a poo ton of "what-if" mania going on in your posts. What's arrogant is not calling you guys morons, it's pretty much a response to your own arrogance. Why the fug should anybody agree with you for saying you think if they just ran the ball at the goal line they would've won, when I'm piling on stats that back up the fact that running the ball is not as important as people make it seem on the forum?

#16 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,942
  • Reputation: 5,486
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:11 AM

So if the 49ers didn't lose the game (by 3 points btw), the running game would be vital towards getting a Lombardi and this team would "be on the right page"?

Every offense has a formula. Of course it's going to look awful when a team doesn't win games with it. It's silly to think that the Super Bowl-winning formula is the only formula capable of being successful.


The Panthers selling out to the read-option offense this past year cost us.

Just because the Ravens won the championship doesn't mean they did everything perfectly and our team should just copy their gameplan like sheep.


their franchise model is world's better than ours and has been for years, so yea taking a few pages from their book would help

Saying the running game doesn't matter because the Ravens won without it, would be like saying that 109-yard kickoff returns are necessary to win next year's Super Bowl.


this would actually be more accurately analogous to saying that good special teams helps a lot, and if not for a bunch of special teams gaffes on the Ravens' part against the Broncos several weeks ago that game would not have made it to overtime.

#17 cultclassiccat

cultclassiccat

    flash

  • Joined: 18-March 12
  • posts: 1,742
  • Reputation: 375
  • LocationG spot
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:13 AM

if you cant see that your argument is one sided and doesnt include a new variable, that is the mobile qb, then you sir are the moron.

a long overdue block in 3....2.....1......

#18 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,942
  • Reputation: 5,486
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:16 AM

35 years old and he still can't take it when someone calls him a moron

go ahead and press that block button nancy

#19 cultclassiccat

cultclassiccat

    flash

  • Joined: 18-March 12
  • posts: 1,742
  • Reputation: 375
  • LocationG spot
SUPPORTER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:29 AM

35 years old and he still can't take it when someone calls him a moron

go ahead and press that block button nancy

listen up. your god almightyness is laughable, so are your witty name calling attempts. i point out a flaw in your STATS and you cant come up with a logical retort and have to do what other grownups such as yourself do and call people morons and nancys. yes, im actually tired of reading your posts, sorry if that hurts your e-boy ego.

#20 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,942
  • Reputation: 5,486
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:09 AM

no cultclassiccat don't block me, keep enlightening me on this new concept of the "mobile qb" which has been around for at least 20 years


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users