Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

After watching the Super Bowl, what position do we need to have most to win?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
94 replies to this topic

#37 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • Joined: 11-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,165
  • Reputation: 1,181
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 06:29 PM

And what did Moss, Jenkins, Ginn, do exactly?

not the point, they where all on a team that went to the super bowl and where high draft picks which teams invested in.they all had impacts on there teams all season.

#38 frash.exe

frash.exe

    Freddy Frashbear

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 15,284
  • Reputation: 5,875
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 06:38 PM

we could very well use a game breaking WR

don't know if there is a WR with that ability at 14 in the draft though

#39 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 07:00 PM

So now to be in the Superbowl you need 1st round Wr no matter the fact they didn't do poo? Or were even drafted by that team (except Jenkins and Crabtree). Does it matter that Lafell had better numbers then Moss, Jenkins, and Finn combined this year?

#40 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • Joined: 04-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,491
  • Reputation: 190
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 07:39 PM

we could very well use a game breaking WR

don't know if there is a WR with that ability at 14 in the draft though


Cordarralle Patterson.

#41 Keep Pounding

Keep Pounding

    Smith & Wesson 460

  • Joined: 22-January 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,813
  • Reputation: 596
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 07:43 PM

Coverage Corners, for how good the 49ers front 7 is, their corners were a liability and got abused all night long. We got a good front 7, but we lack playmakers in the secondary badly.

#42 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 07:45 PM

Cordarralle Patterson.


Yes a person who runs bad routes and has bad hands and only played Wr 1 year at a high level.

#43 Bwood

Bwood

    It's all about the

  • Joined: 04-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,491
  • Reputation: 190
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:14 PM

Yes a person who runs bad routes and has bad hands and only played Wr 1 year at a high level.


"Yeah let's draft Cam Newton, a QB with bad foot work, running a gimmick spread offense, with one year playing at a high level..."

#44 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
HUDDLER

Posted 04 February 2013 - 10:07 PM

"Yeah let's draft Cam Newton, a QB with bad foot work, running a gimmick spread offense, with one year playing at a high level..."


Yeah let's compare 2 different position to make a argument.

How about you find me another WR as example instead of a national Championship winning QB. Who carried his team in that "1" season.

#45 KendrickPanther

KendrickPanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 21-March 12
  • posts: 9,436
  • Reputation: 5,220
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:00 AM

The head coach responses are irrelevant and dumb because the question is what position wins Super Bowls these days.

Obviously the coaches do the prepping but installing about the PLAYERS.

The only position you can link to winning Super Bowls is QB. TEAMS win Super Bowls. The Ravens and Niners were stacked everywhere. How can you sit here and say any one position was the reason? Just got 1-11 both sides of the ball and their guys are playing at a high level. The skill guys backing up those guys are playing at a high level.

#46 LinvilleGorge

LinvilleGorge

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 6,969
  • Reputation: 4,588
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 01:05 AM

IMO, the Super Bowl was a pretty strong argument for DT. The Ravens' D went to poo when Ngata got hurt.

But, I still think we go OL in the 1st.

#47 NanuqoftheNorth

NanuqoftheNorth

    Frosty Alaskan Amber

  • Joined: 09-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,644
  • Reputation: 2,193
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 03:42 AM

Should focus primarily on improving both lines. If pressed for a specific position, I'd have to say HC.

#48 DaveThePanther2008

DaveThePanther2008

    Gonna live and die as a faithful Panther Fan

  • Joined: 09-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,803
  • Reputation: 985
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 06:45 AM

DT not that important. It wasn't a coincidence that once H. Ngata went out the 49ers came alive.

Add a beastly DT and CJ and Hardy become the best DE tandem in the NFL. Our corners become better and our entire defense gets better.

I like the DT from Utah but his motor is questionable. The DT from Missouri has been mentioned in a couple of mock drafts but IMO 295 isn't going to cause as much trouble. I want Hankins from Ohio St. 6'3" 320 with a good active motor.