Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Jase

Post your effective Tax Rate, if you dare.

126 posts in this topic

1) S

2) 0

3) 16.9%

And Mitt pays 14% after it has already been taxed. Just like we pay additional taxes after we die, when we buy product off the shelf, as a service, etc. If people knew what we actually paid in taxes, there would be outright riots in the streets. It is one of the main reasons I am for the Fair Tax.

Dividends havent already been taxed... It isnt a loan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no one pays taxes after they die. maybe the parasitic children of rich people are responsible for the taxes on their multimillion dollar inheritances, but that's not what you said. now, stop posting fox news memes.

http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self-Employed/Estate-Tax

Yet another reason no one pays attention to what you have to say. I noticed you didn't have the balls to post your info. Good job there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dividends havent already been taxed... It isnt a loan.

You put $1000 in for an investment in a company. Company makes money. Pays payroll tax, corporate tax, property tax, health care tax... all of that eats into profit. Whatever is left over is THEN left as a dividend. It is then AGAIN taxed.

Jesus... sucked in again... the stupid on this forum is mind-boggling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You put $1000 in for an investment in a company. Company makes money. Pays payroll tax, corporate tax, property tax, health care tax... all of that eats into profit. Whatever is left over is THEN left as a dividend. It is then AGAIN taxed.

Jesus... sucked in again... the stupid on this forum is mind-boggling.

I know how it works. Your dividends havent been taxed. Sorry, threadjack over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

way to miss the point (as usual). you and your ilk go back to working the semantics however you like. doesn't change the reality of what goes in vs what comes out and what the government's actual take ends up being.

i'll leave you to preaching to the rest of the mental midgets on this board trying to explain such a simple concept away

PS - speaking of threadjacking, I noticed you didn't care to post your stats either. Expected. Typical. Cowardly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

way to miss the point (as usual). you and your ilk go back to working the semantics however you like. doesn't change the reality of what goes in vs what comees out and what the government's actual take ends up being.

i'll leave you to preaching to the rest of the mental midgets on this board trying to explain such a simple concept away

PS - speaking of threadjacking, I noticed you didn't care to post your stats either. Expected. Typical. Cowardly.

where are my semantics? you're the one re-defining dividends to get the result you want... Acting like a child won't make you right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

where are my semantics? you're the one re-defining dividends to get the result you want... Acting like a child won't make you right.

re-read thread

note who cited word "dividends" vs concept brought to forefront

look up "semantics" on dictionary.com

catch up to conversation half a page later

- or -

play gospodin and attempt to defend another stupid-ass comment because ego doesn't allow you to process a rational thought

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re-read thread

note who cited word "dividends" vs concept brought to forefront

look up "semantics" on dictionary.com

catch up to conversation half a page later

- or -

play gospodin and attempt to defend another stupid-ass comment because ego doesn't allow you to process a rational thought

so... you weren't talking about dividends? Then why did you use it as a subsequent example? I assumed you were talking about divis because of the tax rate you were using as an example... What were you talking about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so... you weren't talking about dividends? Then why did you use it as a subsequent example? I assumed you were talking about divis because of the tax rate you were using as an example... What were you talking about?

congrats on your threadjacking.... yeah. you still haven't posted your stats

and yeah, i can't dumb it down enough for you. good luck with reading comprehension in the future. maybe stick to picture books

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

still not sure where I'm going to be in the end...

MFJ

1

25%ish is where I expect to be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • @Panthro Proving Medical Malpractice Based on Diagnostic Errors The law does not hold doctors legally responsible for all diagnostic errors. Instead, patients usually must prove three things in order to prevail in a medical malpractice lawsuit based on a wrong diagnosis: A doctor-patient relationship existed. The doctor was negligent -- that is, did not provide treatment in a reasonably skillful and competent manner. The doctor's negligence caused actual injury to the patient. Most medical malpractice cases hinge on either the second or third element (or both) -- was the doctor negligent and did that negligence harm the patient?   Easily provable  1. ER dr saw mom and had all the records. Mom was healthy prior, no issues besides a murmur she was born with. 2. Motrin does dot fix the flu especially if you one has A and B. Greenville drs from ICU would testify against New Bern ER doc. No tamiflu prescribed nor any other treatment besides Motrin. (Anybody can take Tylenol/asprin but tamiflu is prescribed) 3. Without x raying or running further test, mom went from early caught flu to both pneumonia that now developed 3rd stage ARDS and now pulmonary fibrosis is setting in. Due this negligence, mom will live at most 5 years in poor quality will my dad ends bankrupt. I just proved how not properly treating mom has lead to a snowball effect due to incompetence which lead to where we are now. Dad was not given a course of action, he does not have a M.D. at the end of his name, and the hippocratic oath has been tarnished. I am in the settle or I will find out how he will lose his license. I will file a complaint with the hospital and board. Publish in the newspaper about his care and online. My mom will never be the same. 
    • Grigson put in a lot of effort to try and stack the receiving corps. Not all of it was smart effort, but it was effort. O-Line, on the other hand...