To be clear, the Panthers aren't going to switch to a full-time 3-4.
To be honest, this story essentially repackages a fair amount of material from a recent Panthers.com article (link)
Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:19 PM
Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:24 PM
Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:34 PM
Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:42 PM
"That's a very good question," McDermott said. "When those four are healthy, there's a chance we'll experiment more with that. We've thrown a little bit of it out there, particularly on third down.
"Would we like to do more? Absolutely. How much of it? We'll see."
McDermott doesn't plan to overhaul the base 4-3 scheme that's been in place since he arrived in 2011, but he hopes to use some 3-4 looks in third down situations.
The reason? In addition to allowing four of the defense's better players to see the field at the same time, pressures out of a 3-4 scheme can be more varied and create more confusion for an offense.
"Let's face it, we're all creatures of habit, and offensive linemen are used to looking for jerseys with 90 on them," McDermott said. "When you can hide that fourth and fifth rusher, and those rushers come with a 50 number on, or a 40 number or 20 number at times with our pressure packages, that's where you create problems and confusion."
Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:52 PM
From what I read and seen on Panthers.com McDermott wants to sprinkle in more 3-4 looks using all of our LBers and different looks out of the 3-4.
http://www.panthers....7f-f3273723df86
These are words straight out of McDermott's mouth, how can any of yall dispute this?
Posted 04 February 2013 - 01:39 PM
Posted 04 February 2013 - 02:13 PM
Because we've used situational 3-4 hybrid defenses for years.
Most teams do.
But we won't be making any big time switches unless there are some serious personnel moves this offseason.
Posted 04 February 2013 - 02:46 PM
Posted 04 February 2013 - 02:49 PM
The offseason is now in full swing with this 3-4 thread.
Well done
Posted 04 February 2013 - 02:51 PM
JARVIS JONES, UGA OLB
Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:03 PM
Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:13 PM
We don't need anymore LBs but if he somehow managed to slip to us, you MUST take him.
He's the best FB player in the draft.
Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:13 PM
Yet another person who thinks you can just plug any random 4 linebackers into a 3-4 as long as they're "starting caliber."
Was expecting Bleacher Report, turned out to be ESPN. Same level of research I guess.
Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:14 PM
walterfootball is mocking him at like #17. they're claiming that scouts think he's going to flop at the combine and fall into the mid first.
i mean if we want a pass rusher that can pretty much line up anywhere...
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users