Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Why the Panthers Do Not Draft A WR Early


  • Please log in to reply
133 replies to this topic

#111 Rags

Rags

    help

  • Joined: 20-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,337
  • Reputation: 827
  • LocationButtsville, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:14 PM

Sure, most of these guys aren't putting much analysis into this as much as just ranking players and doing high level need stuff.

Walterfootball has us taking a DT though saying we aren't now comfortable with our DTs


Oh yeah I was just saying a lot of these "draftniks" have no idea what they're talking about (A lot of them say our defense is still questionable.)

#112 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:16 PM

there you go with this bs again. numerous plays left on the field by a WR corp you think that needs no upgrades. same thing with the secondary DT and OL spots. i have said numerous times that bpa from those 4 spots will be the pick, but to say WR is ok is just blind.


It is not blind we had a top 5 offense when Chud was doing his job. We had a dangerous offense at the end of the year this year. When the oline gelled and Chud wasn't trying to reinvent the wheel.

I'm sorry I don't see WR being that big of a problem. We were pretty good when we had better play calling and Oline play.


#113 Rags

Rags

    help

  • Joined: 20-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,337
  • Reputation: 827
  • LocationButtsville, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:18 PM

It is not blind we had a top 5 offense when Chud was doing his job.


"Last year we were 16th in passing yards. 23d in passing TD's."

let me guess, it's the oline and chud's fault?

#114 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:20 PM

He didn't start in KC but,

Julio Jones: 5 catches, 66 yards, 1 TD
Marques Colston 5 catches, 52 yards, 2 TD

He played really solid covering Elite WRs and holding them down with questionable saftey help.

But whatever floats your boat dude.


What proof do you have he was on that certain wr all game? You do know we don't let CB go one on one with one WR all game right? Why didn't you show Lance Moore stats and Roddy white in those games.

#115 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:21 PM

"Last year we were 16th in passing yards. 23d in passing TD's."

let me guess, it's the oline and chud's fault?


Yep. We were top 5 in least drops. So the Wr were catching the ball when it hit their hands. But Cam was hit more then any other QB and everybody can admit that Chud poo the bed early in the year with his play calling.

#116 Rags

Rags

    help

  • Joined: 20-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,337
  • Reputation: 827
  • LocationButtsville, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:24 PM

Yep.


So Cam holing on to the ball when none of his receivers could get open depsite having a clean pocket

Chud and O-lines fault?

#117 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:31 PM

So Cam holing on to the ball when none of his receivers could get open depsite having a clean pocket

Chud and O-lines fault?


What happen more? Your scenario or mine.

Now the fact we had a bottom 5 rated oline and players calling out Chud on a weekly basis. Might suggest my scenario happened more.

#118 Rags

Rags

    help

  • Joined: 20-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,337
  • Reputation: 827
  • LocationButtsville, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:31 PM

But Cam was hit more then any other QB


You uh

You sure about that bud

We were 15th in sacks allowed and 11th in QB hits, both top half of the leauge. We allowed less hits and sacks than the 49ers and their stout O-line!

The Falcons (7th in sacks, 24th in hits) and Packers (31st in sacks, 26th in hits) both allow a ton of hits but continue to go to the playoffs. I wonder why.

Mind you this is without our all-pro Center.

#119 Rags

Rags

    help

  • Joined: 20-April 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,337
  • Reputation: 827
  • LocationButtsville, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:33 PM

What happen more? Your scenario or mine.

Now the fact we had a bottom 5 rated oline and players calling out Chud on a weekly basis. Might suggest my scenario happened more.


Chud's play calling was based on the over use of the read options and the lack of use of our running game, despite the fact we have a TON of money invested in our back field, and gettign way too cute with his play calling and overthinking things.

Try again pal.

#120 koolkatluke

koolkatluke

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,847
  • Reputation: 474
  • LocationNonya
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:40 PM

You uh

You sure about that bud

We were 15th in sacks allowed and 11th in QB hits, both top half of the leauge. We allowed less hits and sacks than the 49ers and their stout O-line!

The Falcons (7th in sacks, 24th in hits) and Packers (31st in sacks, 26th in hits) both allow a ton of hits but continue to go to the playoffs I wonder why.

Mind you this is without our all-pro Center.


No dummy Can was the most hit Qb in the league with RG3 right behind him. And just because Can escaped a lot of sacks doesn't mean he didn't get hit or the Oline did their job.

Again fact is the Oline was ranked 27th in the league. Please keep disputing this and show how dumb you are.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users