lets keep waiting on that 3rd or 4th rounder to develop as the next #1 wr.
What game did we lose because we had Sub par wr
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:02 PM
lets keep waiting on that 3rd or 4th rounder to develop as the next #1 wr.
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:06 PM
there you go with this bs again. numerous plays left on the field by a WR corp you think that needs no upgrades. same thing with the secondary DT and OL spots. i have said numerous times that bpa from those 4 spots will be the pick, but to say WR is ok is just blind.What game did we lose because we had Sub par wr
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:06 PM
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:10 PM
He didn't prove poo are you crazy? You do know Breed still pass for 400 yards that last game? And Matt Ryan had 300+ yards? How about Brady Quinn's Career day did you miss that?
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:11 PM
Sure, most of these guys aren't putting much analysis into this as much as just ranking players and doing high level need stuff.Lot of mocks had us taking DE or DT last year.
Walterfootball is the only one that had us taking Luke because a source told him we were comfortable with our DTs.
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:14 PM
Sure, most of these guys aren't putting much analysis into this as much as just ranking players and doing high level need stuff.
Walterfootball has us taking a DT though saying we aren't now comfortable with our DTs
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:16 PM
there you go with this bs again. numerous plays left on the field by a WR corp you think that needs no upgrades. same thing with the secondary DT and OL spots. i have said numerous times that bpa from those 4 spots will be the pick, but to say WR is ok is just blind.
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:18 PM
It is not blind we had a top 5 offense when Chud was doing his job.
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:20 PM
He didn't start in KC but,
Julio Jones: 5 catches, 66 yards, 1 TD
Marques Colston 5 catches, 52 yards, 2 TD
He played really solid covering Elite WRs and holding them down with questionable saftey help.
But whatever floats your boat dude.
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:21 PM
"Last year we were 16th in passing yards. 23d in passing TD's."
let me guess, it's the oline and chud's fault?
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:24 PM
Yep.
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:31 PM
So Cam holing on to the ball when none of his receivers could get open depsite having a clean pocket
Chud and O-lines fault?
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:31 PM
But Cam was hit more then any other QB
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:33 PM
What happen more? Your scenario or mine.
Now the fact we had a bottom 5 rated oline and players calling out Chud on a weekly basis. Might suggest my scenario happened more.
Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:40 PM
You uh
You sure about that bud
We were 15th in sacks allowed and 11th in QB hits, both top half of the leauge. We allowed less hits and sacks than the 49ers and their stout O-line!
The Falcons (7th in sacks, 24th in hits) and Packers (31st in sacks, 26th in hits) both allow a ton of hits but continue to go to the playoffs I wonder why.
Mind you this is without our all-pro Center.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users