Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Yea its a BR Mock dammit!

95 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Growl' timestamp='1360031069' post='2125156']
We should trade up.




And take Lacy.
[/quote]

Trying too hard brah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='carolina-chuck' timestamp='1360030695' post='2125146']
Taking BPA leads to getting FOOTBALL PLAYERS (Cam/Kuechly).

Taking needs lead to players to fill position(s).
[/quote]

BPA that also fills a need is how you build good football teams....

If BPA is a RB, LB, etc and it isn't a need....you are better off drafting someone with a comparable grade at a more important position for your team
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Growl' timestamp='1360031051' post='2125155']


My God this sounds amazing.
[/quote]

Yea we should've passed up on Cam bc we had Jimmy, and on Luke bc we had Beason right????

Taking BPA, almost, always give you an immediate starter who can impact at a high level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

taking jones make no sense. I mean literally no sense. We have much more pressing needs at DT, OL, WR, and DB. no reason in hell that we should take him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='CRA' timestamp='1360031239' post='2125161']


BPA that also fills a need is how you build good football teams....

If BPA is a RB, LB, etc and it isn't a need....you are better off drafting someone with a comparable grade at a more important position for your team
[/quote]

Like I just comment on another post, should we have passed up on Cam/Luke (BPA)? We had a hyped up QB in Clausen and a Pro Bowler in Beason.

BPA gives you a better chance to find Football Players. Players who going to impact at a high level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

"This is my mock, there are many like it but this one is mine."
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='Cracka McNasty' timestamp='1360031411' post='2125168']
taking jones make no sense. I mean literally no sense. We have much more pressing needs at DT, OL, WR, and DB. no reason in hell that we should take him.
[/quote]

Taking Kuechly last year make no sense also when we had pressing needs at DT, CB, etc.

Sure, I'd be stupid to say for us to take Jarvis in the top5, but at 14 anyone would be stupid to pass him up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

OLB????

Is BR an acronym for Buncha Retards?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='chknwing' timestamp='1360031486' post='2125173']
"This is my mock, there are many like it but this one is mine."
[/quote].

You made that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The only person I would take over Jarvis at 14, would be Warmack. Other than that you kiddin me?

People who talk about needs, would yall at no.14:

Take Hankins/Floyd/Richardson/Jesse over Jarvis?

Take Keenan/Patterson/Twill/Hopkins over Jarvis?

Take Barrett/Cooper/Warford over Jarvis?

Take Reid/McDonald/Elam/etc over Jarvis?

Take Rhodes/Banks/etc over Jarvis?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[quote name='carolina-chuck' timestamp='1360031208' post='2125159']


Trying too hard brah
[/quote]


Look guys he said brah he's a top level poster now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I like Rick Wagner. I definitely trust Wisconsin o-lineman in the NFL and he's been very good for them. Don't know why he isn't higher in some rankings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites