Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

carolina-chuck

Yea its a BR Mock dammit!

95 posts in this topic

"This is my mock, there are many like it but this one is mine."

.

You made that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only person I would take over Jarvis at 14, would be Warmack. Other than that you kiddin me?

People who talk about needs, would yall at no.14:

Take Hankins/Floyd/Richardson/Jesse over Jarvis?

Take Keenan/Patterson/Twill/Hopkins over Jarvis?

Take Barrett/Cooper/Warford over Jarvis?

Take Reid/McDonald/Elam/etc over Jarvis?

Take Rhodes/Banks/etc over Jarvis?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying too hard brah

Look guys he said brah he's a top level poster now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Rick Wagner. I definitely trust Wisconsin o-lineman in the NFL and he's been very good for them. Don't know why he isn't higher in some rankings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if Leon Sandcastle will be there when we pick... Pipe dream. Oh well.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So we see chuck's youtube formed player rankings have led him to believe that we should either take an OG or a LB.

Incoincidentally, two of the easiest positions to hit on because any brain dead imbecile knows what to look for.

Unsuprisingly, as his draft forum track record has indicated, not only can chuck not "scout" players, he doesn't even know what he's looking at when watching anything with any degree of complexity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only person I would take over Jarvis at 14, would be Warmack. Other than that you kiddin me?

People who talk about needs, would yall at no.14:

Take Hankins/Floyd/Richardson/Jesse over Jarvis?

Take Keenan/Patterson/Twill/Hopkins over Jarvis?

Take Barrett/Cooper/Warford over Jarvis?

Take Reid/McDonald/Elam/etc over Jarvis?

Take Rhodes/Banks/etc over Jarvis?

Considering our team and what move would have the maximum effectiveness, I'd take Banks, Rhodes, & Patterson over Jarvis. Now if John Jenkins fell at DT/NT, I'd take him in a heart beat but this Bulldog at OLB? We have one in TD already. This isn't an Anderson replacement. Rest of the draft is good though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So we see chuck's youtube formed player rankings have led him to believe that we should either take an OG or a LB.

Incoincidentally, two of the easiest positions to hit on because any brain dead imbecile knows what to look for.

Unsuprisingly, as his draft forum track record has indicated, not only can chuck not "scout" players, he doesn't even know what he's looking at when watching anything with any degree of complexity

Lol funny.

Atleast I'm the only person on here who'll admit I'm not good at scouting. If I was or any of you guys are, y'all be getting paid right now Lookin at 2013 NFL prospects. Yea, that's not watching 5-8mim highlights on YouTube and considering it "films".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking Kuechly last year make no sense also when we had pressing needs at DT, CB, etc.

Sure, I'd be stupid to say for us to take Jarvis in the top5, but at 14 anyone would be stupid to pass him up.

Luke made plenty of sense....LB play was HORRIBLE in 2011.

Our LBs heading into 2012 consisted of 3 ACL tear (IR) Davis and an IR'd Beason with a major injury one whose comeback to full form was very doubtful. LB WAS a NEED.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering our team and what move would have the maximum effectiveness, I'd take Banks, Rhodes, & Patterson over Jarvis. Now if John Jenkins fell at DT/NT, I'd take him in a heart beat but this Bulldog at OLB? We have one in TD already. This isn't an Anderson replacement. Rest of the draft is good though.

I'm not sure I'd take Banks, Rhodes or Patterson over Jarvis. Maybe Banks if I really has to and Gamble is cut. Patterson is a HOTT name and a lot of fans are going to be riding his wagon. The kid has huge ceiling, but when youre taking him you are getting a raw receiver to work with. It's a 50/50 boom or bust pick. Is the reward higher than the risk?

Taking Jones, you know exactly what you're getting. Getting an extremely talented passes rusher who can lineup up anywhere. And it's also a "safe pick", unless otherwise something about hus neck is concerning.

TD is not the same type of OLB Jarvis is. Jarvis has way much more potential to be a better player than TD will ever be. Jarvis isn't your tackling machine OLB like TD. He's your modern day hybrid that can create pressure constantly and rack up double digit sacks. Id trade both Anderson/TD for Jarvis in a heart beat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites