Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Yea its a BR Mock dammit!


  • Please log in to reply
94 replies to this topic

#16 Cracka McNasty

Cracka McNasty

    WWNPHD?

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,382 posts

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:30 PM

taking jones make no sense. I mean literally no sense. We have much more pressing needs at DT, OL, WR, and DB. no reason in hell that we should take him.

#17 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,518 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:31 PM

BPA that also fills a need is how you build good football teams....

If BPA is a RB, LB, etc and it isn't a need....you are better off drafting someone with a comparable grade at a more important position for your team


Like I just comment on another post, should we have passed up on Cam/Luke (BPA)? We had a hyped up QB in Clausen and a Pro Bowler in Beason.

BPA gives you a better chance to find Football Players. Players who going to impact at a high level.



#18 chknwing

chknwing

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,131 posts

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:31 PM

"This is my mock, there are many like it but this one is mine."

#19 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,518 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:33 PM

taking jones make no sense. I mean literally no sense. We have much more pressing needs at DT, OL, WR, and DB. no reason in hell that we should take him.


Taking Kuechly last year make no sense also when we had pressing needs at DT, CB, etc.

Sure, I'd be stupid to say for us to take Jarvis in the top5, but at 14 anyone would be stupid to pass him up.

#20 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,882 posts
  • LocationOn a Sales Call

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:33 PM

OLB????

Is BR an acronym for Buncha Retards?

#21 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,518 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:33 PM

"This is my mock, there are many like it but this one is mine."

.

You made that?

#22 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,518 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:39 PM

The only person I would take over Jarvis at 14, would be Warmack. Other than that you kiddin me?

People who talk about needs, would yall at no.14:

Take Hankins/Floyd/Richardson/Jesse over Jarvis?

Take Keenan/Patterson/Twill/Hopkins over Jarvis?

Take Barrett/Cooper/Warford over Jarvis?

Take Reid/McDonald/Elam/etc over Jarvis?

Take Rhodes/Banks/etc over Jarvis?

#23 Growl

Growl

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,452 posts

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:42 PM

Trying too hard brah



Look guys he said brah he's a top level poster now

#24 beach

beach

    geaux!!

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,035 posts

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:44 PM

I like Rick Wagner. I definitely trust Wisconsin o-lineman in the NFL and he's been very good for them. Don't know why he isn't higher in some rankings.

#25 Dex

Dex

    Gameday Menu Connoisseur

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,342 posts
  • LocationConnecticut

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:45 PM

I wonder if Leon Sandcastle will be there when we pick... Pipe dream. Oh well.

#26 Growl

Growl

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,452 posts

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:47 PM

So we see chuck's youtube formed player rankings have led him to believe that we should either take an OG or a LB.

Incoincidentally, two of the easiest positions to hit on because any brain dead imbecile knows what to look for.

Unsuprisingly, as his draft forum track record has indicated, not only can chuck not "scout" players, he doesn't even know what he's looking at when watching anything with any degree of complexity

#27 beach

beach

    geaux!!

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,035 posts

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:48 PM

The only person I would take over Jarvis at 14, would be Warmack. Other than that you kiddin me?

People who talk about needs, would yall at no.14:

Take Hankins/Floyd/Richardson/Jesse over Jarvis?

Take Keenan/Patterson/Twill/Hopkins over Jarvis?

Take Barrett/Cooper/Warford over Jarvis?

Take Reid/McDonald/Elam/etc over Jarvis?

Take Rhodes/Banks/etc over Jarvis?


Considering our team and what move would have the maximum effectiveness, I'd take Banks, Rhodes, & Patterson over Jarvis. Now if John Jenkins fell at DT/NT, I'd take him in a heart beat but this Bulldog at OLB? We have one in TD already. This isn't an Anderson replacement. Rest of the draft is good though.

#28 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,518 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:50 PM

So we see chuck's youtube formed player rankings have led him to believe that we should either take an OG or a LB.

Incoincidentally, two of the easiest positions to hit on because any brain dead imbecile knows what to look for.

Unsuprisingly, as his draft forum track record has indicated, not only can chuck not "scout" players, he doesn't even know what he's looking at when watching anything with any degree of complexity


Lol funny.

Atleast I'm the only person on here who'll admit I'm not good at scouting. If I was or any of you guys are, y'all be getting paid right now Lookin at 2013 NFL prospects. Yea, that's not watching 5-8mim highlights on YouTube and considering it "films".

#29 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Moderators
  • 23,641 posts

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:51 PM

Taking Kuechly last year make no sense also when we had pressing needs at DT, CB, etc.

Sure, I'd be stupid to say for us to take Jarvis in the top5, but at 14 anyone would be stupid to pass him up.


Luke made plenty of sense....LB play was HORRIBLE in 2011.

Our LBs heading into 2012 consisted of 3 ACL tear (IR) Davis and an IR'd Beason with a major injury one whose comeback to full form was very doubtful. LB WAS a NEED.


#30 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    JASON VERRETT 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,518 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 04 February 2013 - 09:57 PM

Considering our team and what move would have the maximum effectiveness, I'd take Banks, Rhodes, & Patterson over Jarvis. Now if John Jenkins fell at DT/NT, I'd take him in a heart beat but this Bulldog at OLB? We have one in TD already. This isn't an Anderson replacement. Rest of the draft is good though.


I'm not sure I'd take Banks, Rhodes or Patterson over Jarvis. Maybe Banks if I really has to and Gamble is cut. Patterson is a HOTT name and a lot of fans are going to be riding his wagon. The kid has huge ceiling, but when youre taking him you are getting a raw receiver to work with. It's a 50/50 boom or bust pick. Is the reward higher than the risk?

Taking Jones, you know exactly what you're getting. Getting an extremely talented passes rusher who can lineup up anywhere. And it's also a "safe pick", unless otherwise something about hus neck is concerning.

TD is not the same type of OLB Jarvis is. Jarvis has way much more potential to be a better player than TD will ever be. Jarvis isn't your tackling machine OLB like TD. He's your modern day hybrid that can create pressure constantly and rack up double digit sacks. Id trade both Anderson/TD for Jarvis in a heart beat.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.