Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

NFL.com's way too early 2013 Power Rankings


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 BigBeezy

BigBeezy

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 11-January 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 285
  • Reputation: 20
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:03 PM

http://www.nfl.com/n...-into-offseason

Elliot Harrison has us at 19. Doesn't look too bad but I think he has the Saints rated a little too high at 11. Still a lot of time between now and the start of next season though. Thoughts?

#2 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,897
  • Reputation: 7,796
Moderators

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:08 PM

i think the saints are in worse cap trouble than we are and jimmy graham is talking about holding out. they don't have a DC yet and they have old poo on D as it is.

payton or not, i don't see them being that much better than us next year. they've peaked.

#3 TheJason

TheJason

    Black & Blue in The Bay

  • Joined: 29-August 09
  • posts: 388
  • Reputation: 193
  • LocationLivermore
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:14 PM

"Chudzinski played a large role in the late-season success."


Guess we're screwed.

#4 Gucci Mane

Gucci Mane

    Trap God

  • Joined: 02-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,966
  • Reputation: 1,590
  • LocationKitchen
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:21 PM

Yea thank god chud was throwing all those touchdowns and not throwing interceptions for us down the stretch... also those critical first down scrambles.

#5 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 22,933
  • Reputation: 18,362
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:27 PM

Yea thank god chud was throwing all those touchdowns and not throwing interceptions for us down the stretch... also those critical first down scrambles.


to be fair, chudz did vastly improve his playcalling as the season wore on... though it's more than likely only because injuries on the offensive line forced quicker plays and routes designed accordingly.

#6 Cyberjag

Cyberjag

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,830
  • Reputation: 638
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:31 PM

I hate hearing 19, but I also understand how hard it can be for someone who isn't a Panther fan to put them ahead of teams like the Saints, Cowboys, Vikings, Rams, etc... Which teams does he have ahead of us that you can honestly say will be worse than the Panthers?

#7 Gucci Mane

Gucci Mane

    Trap God

  • Joined: 02-November 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,966
  • Reputation: 1,590
  • LocationKitchen
HUDDLER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 04:32 PM

to be fair, chudz did vastly improve his playcalling as the season wore on... though it's more than likely only because injuries on the offensive line forced quicker plays and routes designed accordingly.


Exactly so the statement should read: "Chud squanders season early, improves playcalling down the stretch."

#8 Montsta

Montsta

    Rest In Peace

  • Joined: 08-December 08
  • posts: 7,418
  • Reputation: 5,440
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:28 PM

The cowboys suck every year and every year they are put in the top 15 for next years way too early power rankings. I think it's that sweet video board they have.

#9 The Huddler

The Huddler

    #BringHardyBack

  • Joined: 17-June 11
  • posts: 6,082
  • Reputation: 3,932
  • Location@TheHuddler2
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:43 PM

Chud was the problem last year. Notice when Rivera's ass was nice and hot Chud stopped bein a tard. Our offense doesnt need to be super complicated to be good.

#10 The Huddler

The Huddler

    #BringHardyBack

  • Joined: 17-June 11
  • posts: 6,082
  • Reputation: 3,932
  • Location@TheHuddler2
SUPPORTER

Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:44 PM

Rivera straightend Chud out. It came to a point where Rivera had to tell it how it was.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users