Beason a June 1st cut?
#1
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:27 PM
Hurney really screwed us. 2014 being in such bad shape really handcuffs the "magic" we can pull off.
#2
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:28 PM
#3
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:30 PM
#4
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:30 PM
We are over the cap!!!!
When did this happen?
#5
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:31 PM
#6
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:32 PM
Luke is our MLB. The future of our D.Beason isn't going no where
Beason is too expensive considering what he now is....
#7
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:34 PM
I am talking about creating cap space, of course he would still have an impact towards it in a cut. But a June 1 cut would create 2013 space right? It just throws a larger chunk toward 2014.Beason would still count against our cap even if he's cut. We're not cutting Beason.
#8
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:36 PM
#9
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:36 PM
Luke is our MLB. The future of our D.
Beason is too expensive considering what he now is....
If anything, I rather cut Anderson. Would cutting Anderson help save any cap or are we going to take a hit?
And I read on PFT that we can carry a little over 3mill this upcoming season. Unlike Philly who has 23mill to carry over.
#10
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:38 PM
He does account for 9.5 million of next year's cap but his contract is crazy
Right now:
He takes up
9.5 in 2012
10.75 in 2013
Does a June 1 cut mean
4 in 2012
8 in 2013??
That is my question
#11
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:40 PM
Right now:
He takes up
9.5 in 2012
10.75 in 2013
Does a June 1 cut mean
4 in 2012
8 in 2013??
That is my question
Yeah, I'm not sure
Do we have a resident cap guy?
#12
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:41 PM
Anderson is healthy. That factors in. he isn't coming off back to back years of IRIf anything, I rather cut Anderson. Would cutting Anderson help save any cap or are we going to take a hit?
And I read on PFT that we can carry a little over 3mill this upcoming season. Unlike Philly who has 23mill to carry over.
#13
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:47 PM
#14
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:49 PM
he hasn't been a good player on D in yearS.We should keep him. More good players on defense the better.
Doubtful he will be in 2013. Odds against it.
His job is also gone, making him more of a situational LB
The fact he was a great player, leader, and rep of our franchise does get thrown out the window to a degree when looking forward. Sucks he got hurt. We can't afford to hold out hope like we did with Davis for multiple guys.
#15
Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:50 PM
Q: Does the June 1 rule still exist?
A: If a team cuts a veteran player after June 1, the remaining signing bonus will be spread over two years rather than accelerate into the current year’s cap. For example, John Doe is cut in year 2 of his contract with $2M left on his signing bonus and a base salary of $1M before June 1. His team is hit with dead money ($1M base salary less $2M signing bonus equals $1M in dead cap space).
If John is cut AFTER June 1, only $1M of his remaining $2M signing bonus hits the current cap year with the remaining million being dumped into the next year’s cap. Thus, if you subtract the $1M signing bonus from the $1M scheduled base, John Doe ends up costing his team ZERO against the current year’s cap; however, in the next year’s cap, he’ll end up costing his team $1M against the cap.
http://insidefootball.com/blog/archives/3990
decipher it however you want
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





