PFF is usually pretty good, but....when did Frank Alexander become a DT, lol
They said of players that played over 100 snaps at Dt. Never said he was a full time Dt
Posted 10 February 2013 - 01:37 PM
PFF is usually pretty good, but....when did Frank Alexander become a DT, lol
Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:16 PM
Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:28 PM
Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:38 PM
Except another wide receiver who is better than everyone else besides Smitty and Lafell...
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:36 PM
Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:53 PM
Posted 10 February 2013 - 05:42 PM
Posted 10 February 2013 - 09:32 PM
Posted 10 February 2013 - 11:02 PM
Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:02 PM
Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:35 PM
This team gains nothing by adding Barden.
Posted 12 February 2013 - 09:46 AM
we are the only team he's ever looked any good against.I would have said that before Barden torched us. Haven't seen too many of our WRs not named Smith have a game like that. None actually in a few years.
Posted 12 February 2013 - 09:49 AM
Posted 12 February 2013 - 10:20 AM
How come almost every name they give us is coming off some sort of injury? I realize we need to go cheap, but do our cheap guys all need to be recovering from an injury?
There are going to be a whole lot of cheap guys out there this year. Maybe we should look at the healthy guys first, then settle for what we can get later.
Posted 12 February 2013 - 12:41 PM
PFF isn't game planning for Rivera/FO, but to include gaining solid talent at a cheap price in an article requires another factor, like injuries from a previous year, or else we aren't talking cheap.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users