Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Espn insider:do not cut deangelo williams

72 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8932280/which-high-priced-players-cut-which-kept-nfl

Don't cut: DeAngelo Williams

The Panthers have 47 running backs, and they have work to do with the passing game, which is why they also have a new GM. But they should at least look to restructure the deal of the back who was easily the best one on the roster in 2012. Cutting Williams saves about $4.8M against the 2013 cap, but Jonathan Stewart and Mike Tolbert were far less efficient.

I ve seen tons of arguements for why we should cut him. But very few saying why we should keep him... what say you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

yPkO12T.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'd like to keep him if we can restructure and give him more than 7 to 10 carries a game. If not then he is being wasted here and I would like to see him go to a team like Denver that will give him 20+ a game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'm glad I don't pay to read ESPN insider if that's what they're publishing

rotoworld, a free website, has a much more in depth explanation of the cap ramifications of cutting Williams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'd love to keep him here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

When this team will be a legit title contender in a few years, Deangelo isn't going to be the RB of that team, it will be Stewart

So just get rid of Deangelo now, save the money, use it where it's needed more than RB, and let Stewart grow along with Cam and the rest of the offense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

When this team will be a legit title contender in a few years, Deangelo isn't going to be the RB of that team, it will be Stewart

So just get rid of Deangelo now, save the money, use it where it's needed more than RB, and let Stewart grow along with Cam and the rest of the offense

Stewart cant even stay on the field, why should we put all our chips in him?

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Stewart cant even stay on the field, why should we put all our chips in him?

Before this season he missed two games in his entire career

Then he had both a high ankle and regular ankle sprain on the same play that essentially finished his season due to our record, I'm sure he would have been able to play had we been in the playoff hunt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Stewart cant even stay on the field, why should we put all our chips in him?

EAT THEM! EAT ALL OF THE CHIPS, MR STEWART! THEY MUST ALL BE IN YOU!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Put the chips on the OL and it makes less difference who you have back there--Tauren Poole could average 3.5 yards a game like DW did. Most RBs hit the wall at 30, and DW is no different. If it were up to me, I would rarely sign a RB to a second contract. There are too many decent backs out there, while good OL are hard to find.

(As for the ever so humorous attempt to derail this thread by a moderator, why are some of the moderators the biggest pricks on this forum? Sorry in advance to all the kids out there trying to discuss and learn about the Panthers. There are some unbalanced dweebs who were not breast fed that feel a need to measure their self worth by throwing zingers at others to get pie from other pricks. In person, I doubt they are like that at all because their employers, probably all a part of the dynamic fast food industry, do not have dental plans for part timers working their way through CPCC's GED program.)

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Cam is our best runner. We just need an adequate RB.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Nutz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites