Steelers Likely To Cut Three O-Linemen
#1
Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:31 AM
#2
Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:37 AM
#3
Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:43 AM
#4
Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:47 AM
#5
Posted 11 February 2013 - 09:58 AM
#6
Posted 11 February 2013 - 01:09 PM
#7
Posted 11 February 2013 - 01:12 PM
#8
Posted 11 February 2013 - 03:07 PM
#9
Posted 11 February 2013 - 03:22 PM
#10
Posted 11 February 2013 - 03:33 PM
don't want any steeler OL cast offs, tho. they've been really bad for years.
#11
Posted 11 February 2013 - 03:46 PM
#12
Posted 11 February 2013 - 03:51 PM
The thing i like to remember when referencing the Steelers offensive line is that these guys were part of the smash mouth downhill run blockers. The new Steelers are going pass heavy and looking for more athletic lineman. Im sure that one of these stout run blockers could fill that right guard spot nicely. At least for a year or two until we can draft a replacement.
Steelers have been pass happy for quite a few years now and those guys haven't really been good at either run or pass blocking..
#13
Posted 11 February 2013 - 03:54 PM
Steelers have been pass happy for quite a few years now and those guys haven't really been good at either run or pass blocking..
One could be seen as a result of the other. Kind of like how our line produced good rushing totals until Chud found away to neutralize their talents with the read option.
#14
Posted 11 February 2013 - 04:07 PM
One could be seen as a result of the other. Kind of like how our line produced good rushing totals until Chud found away to neutralize their talents with the read option.
can't say I have seen either though.. poor at rushing, while the QB consistently finds a way to keep the play alive in spite of his OL's pass protection.
#15
Posted 11 February 2013 - 04:08 PM
And while the Steelers OL isn't an elite group by any means, they aren't as bad as they are perceived. Big Ben hanging onto the ball for 18 seconds every play makes them look worse than they really are.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users





