Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Mr. Scot

Miss California stripped of title

33 posts in this topic

It's pretty obvious she'll do anything for attention. She probably didn't show up to something knowing she would get another run in the papers for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't her fault. I set the alarm to 6 PM by accident. I blame myself.

:cheers2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First reports by the media can be deceiving. Looks like the only thing she missed was unauthorized events promoting the gay agenda which the pagent staff thought would be a good education for her. could be a lawsuit.

Gotta love the media.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First reports by the media can be deceiving. Looks like the only thing she missed was unauthorized events promoting the gay agenda which the pagent staff thought would be a good education for her. could be a lawsuit.

Gotta love the media.

song-chart-memes-gay-agenda1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First reports by the media can be deceiving. Looks like the only thing she missed was unauthorized events promoting the gay agenda which the pagent staff thought would be a good education for her. could be a lawsuit.

Gotta love the media.

source?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amused that she says that from day one they wanted her out because of her stance on gay marriage. The photos would have been all the excuse they needed had they wanted to get rid of her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All intentional on her part I am sure. At this point with all of that media coverage, miss california title is holding her back and costing her money. She doesn't need it anymore.

Possible.

Views aside, something about her gives me the impression she's one of those "difficult to work with" personalities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possible.

Views aside, something about her gives me the impression she's one of those "difficult to work with" personalities.

Not if you get a few beers in her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All intentional on her part I am sure. At this point with all of that media coverage, miss california title is holding her back and costing her money. She doesn't need it anymore.

Exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not if you get a few beers in her.

Must be after you add the rapees...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was very intrigued by him early on. The tape (highlights) look good, and at that size still seemed to have pull away speed. Then I looked into him more, and he has some very bad fumbling issues. If I am remembering right it is like once in every 34 carries on average.  Near the bottom in the entire RB draft class.
    • Honestly I claim no expertise regarding the draft and haven't gone to the trouble of creating a board or ranking players. But I think that guys in the top 50 are often from bigger schools and get more hype than other guys.  Plus there may be guys taken at some positions much sooner or later than previous years. In the past 2 drafts, no tight ends were drafted in the first round. And the last time 4 TEs were picked in the top 3 rounds was a decade ago. This year we could see 2 tight ends taken in the first round alone and another 2 or 3 in the second round.  On the other hand there is often a run of OTs taken in the first and this might be the first draft in a while where no OTs are taken in the top 20. We could get one of the top 10 tackles at 98 or 115 where other years they would be chosen much higher. Is that because they all suck or is it that there are more attractive guys at other positions?  You make a good point about trading up. Is it better to have 2 picks at 40 and 64 instead of one at 24. I think it depends on how we see our current projected starters.  If we think we have several holes to fill and these guys are going to be impact players than don't trade up. If you think that the guy at 64 would be a rotational guy but who we want at 24 is going to be a starter and really impact the team, you trade up. It depends on what we think we need and how the draft pans out.