Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Kurb

Corradell Patterson Writeup.

183 posts in this topic

Raw to many catches hit his body runs a few routes no college production. Yes let's make a project the 14 pick.

"lol maybe if I throw out all these random things that I've heard people say about receivers before people will finally start taking my opinion seriously"

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not even close. I ask again tell me the last wr that went in the top 20 with these numbers? 45 rec. 545 yards and 5 td.

Im not looking at stats. His ceiling is off the roof. He could be the first wide receiver off the board in April. You're entitled to your opinion. Argue with yourself about it. I dont have time for you today.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

honestly the more this guy cries about us not needing good players at the receiver position the more and more I'm prone to feel that do we need one

(and for the record, anyone who says we don't is just lulzworthy anyways)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The more I see people pump up BS prospects and don't use common sense. The more I understand they don't know poo about football so why should I care. So by all means keep falling in love with lesser prospects. When it doesn't work out I'll be here bumping threads so people can read their stupid comments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"lol maybe if I throw out all these random things that I've heard people say about receivers before people will finally start taking my opinion seriously"

FWIW I emailed Silva about that very subject and he said that was his biggest "nitpick".

It's pretty significant, catching with hands is important in the NFL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The more I see people pump up BS prospects and don't use common sense. The more I understand they don't no poo about football so why should I care. So by all means keep falling in love with lesser prospects. When it doesn't work out I'll be here bumping threads so people can read their stupid comments.

Yea Patterson is GARBAGE, but LaFAIL is KING. You're praising the wrong guy. Id take you more seriously if you werent riding on LaFail's nuts that hard.

but I completely agree that if both Keenan and Patterson are there at 14, I would much rather go with Keenan. But you cant argue that Patterson isnt the no.1/no.2 wr in this class.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea Patterson is GARBAGE, but LaFAIL is KING. You're praising the wrong guy. Id take you more seriously if you werent riding on LaFail's nuts that hard.

but I completely agree that if both Keenan and Patterson are there at 14, I would much rather go with Keenan. But you cant argue that Patterson isnt the no.1/no.2 wr in this class.

Way to exaggerate Chuck like you always do. Never said the kid was garbage or Lafell is god of Wr.

Patterson is just not worthy of a top 15 pick. He is not polished like WR who are normally picked that high. He doesn't run or know all the routes in the route tree like Wr who are picked that high. He doesn't have the production of a WR who is normally picked that high. All that amounts to is reaching.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO. The other WR from UT Hunter is the better "WR". Coming off a ACL he had 73 rec. 1083 yards 9 td. That's impressive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO. The other WR from UT Hunter is the better "WR". Coming off a ACL he had 73 rec. 1083 yards 9 td. That's impressive.

Hunter and Twill are two other guys that I think are worthy of 1st picks along with Keenan and Patterson. Patterson just have too much room to grow. He boomed in his first year in the NCAA DI level in a SEC conference. I have high hopes that he can impact the same in the next level. He also has great tremendous size and speed. I wouldnt say that the kid is "raw". I'll just say that Patterson isnt "polished". The potential is there for Patterson.

I hate to bring up Stephen Hill's name up again, but he and Thomas were two prospects that came out and were tagged being "raw". Hill isnt proven, but he has shown that he has potential to become a very good wideout if giving consistency at QB. Hill played very well in the beginning of the season alongside Santonio Holmes. Thomas was a very raw player coming out also. All he did at GT was run the 9 route in a read option system. Played well with The Golden Calf of Bristol and now is one of the Top15 wide receiver in the NFL catching passes from Manning.

Patterson will fit really well in our offense. We have an incredibly talented QB in Cam and Patterson will only improve learning and playing along with 89. That's exactly what Patterson needs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hunter and Twill are two other guys that I think are worthy of 1st picks along with Keenan and Patterson. Patterson just have too much room to grow. He boomed in his first year in the NCAA DI level in a SEC conference. I have high hopes that he can impact the same in the next level. He also has great tremendous size and speed. I wouldnt say that the kid is "raw". I'll just say that Patterson isnt "polished". The potential is there for Patterson.

I hate to bring up Stephen Hill's name up again, but he and Thomas were two prospects that came out and were tagged being "raw". Hill isnt proven, but he has shown that he has potential to become a very good wideout if giving consistency at QB. Hill played very well in the beginning of the season alongside Santonio Holmes. Thomas was a very raw player coming out also. All he did at GT was run the 9 route in a read option system. Played well with The Golden Calf of Bristol and now is one of the Top15 wide receiver in the NFL catching passes from Manning.

Patterson will fit really well in our offense. We have an incredibly talented QB in Cam and Patterson will only improve playing along and learning from 89. That's exactly what Patterson needs.

Hill sucked and it will be 2 more years before you see his impact. He lined up wrong and didn't know the routes like I said last year.

I don't want to wait for Patterson to learn to be a Wr. I rather get a DT who can be a Dt from day 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hill sucked and it will be 2 more years before you see his impact. He lined up wrong and didn't know the routes like I said last year.

I don't want to wait for Patterson to learn to be a Wr. I rather get a DT who can be a Dt from day 1.

Hill doesn't suck. You're only saying that bc you don't want to lose ur argument from last year. But eventually you will like it or not.

I most importantly prefer a DT/Warmack or Vaccaro at 14, but taking Patterson is on more on the BPA side of thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hill doesn't suck. You're only saying that bc you don't want to lose ur argument from last year. But eventually you will like it or not.

I most importantly prefer a DT/Warmack or Vaccaro at 14, but taking Patterson is on more on the BPA side of thing.

You' re right I forgot. 23 rec. 324 yards and 3 td in 12-13 games is a good season for a WR.

What was I thinking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites