Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Alternate Solutions to the Crowded Backfield

50 posts in this topic

Posted

Been reading all the comments lately about Stew's re-structure and everyone wanting to cut D-Will. But Williams was our most consistent back, and has been. Stewart has been hurt each of the last couple of seasons and as a feature back can we depend on him to hold up managing the bulk of the carries?

D-Will has always expressed his interest in staying and I don't see why he wouldn't be open to a re-structured deal as well given the signing bonus he received last season...

I'd be curious to know how much cutting Tolbert would free up, in conjunction with a Williams re-structure. As much as I like Tolbert his role was limited until Stew's injury, and I don't think the offense would miss him. Broeckel, or another FA could fill the H-Back role at a cheaper rate.

I just don't think we should split up one of the best rushing tandems if we can work around it, especially witht the commitment we saw to running the ball traditionally the last half of the year. IMO you cannot ignore Williams' production if a re-structure is available.

Just my .02.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

drink much before posting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Part of the question is how much will the offense change under Shula. if we are going back to more of a running offense, then you could justify keeping 2 guys who are starting quality. But if we are going to continue similarly to what we did over the past 2 years, then it hard to justify keeping both. At this point if you have to get rid of one, then you are almost obligated to get rid of Williams. When the contract was signed it was pretty much understood that he wouldn't play out the whole contract. The biggest issue was to determine at what point we could trade or cut him and not incur too much of a cap hit.

One question I have is how everyone will feel when we cut him and one of our division rivals picks him up. With all the cap space Tampa has at this point, we could be facing him twice a year and hoping he doesn't break the big one on us. It was one thing when we thought that we would cutting him when he was pretty much washed up, but if we cut him now, we would be getting rid of a back who has been very productive for us and a guy who would be motivated to show us we shouldn't have let him go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Tobert is too versatile to cut. He can play halfback or fullback, he can lead block, and he can catch out of the backfield.

Tolbert is a guy we need to keep if we keep elements of the read option in our package (which we should)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Part of the question is how much will the offense change under Shula. if we are going back to more of a running offense, then you could justify keeping 2 guys who are starting quality. But if we are going to continue similarly to what we did over the past 2 years, then it hard to justify keeping both. At this point if you have to get rid of one, then you are almost obligated to get rid of Williams. When the contract was signed it was pretty much understood that he wouldn't play out the whole contract. The biggest issue was to determine at what point we could trade or cut him and not incur too much of a cap hit.

One question I have is how everyone will feel when we cut him and one of our division rivals picks him up. With all the cap space Tampa has at this point, we could be facing him twice a year and hoping he doesn't break the big one on us. It was one thing when we thought that we would cutting him when he was pretty much washed up, but if we cut him now, we would be getting rid of a back who has been very productive for us and a guy who would be motivated to show us we shouldn't have let him go.

I would have hoped we find starting backs in the draft that didn't cost us so much.. as for playing for a rival, that's a chance every team has to take when letting a player walk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Deangelo is gone guys. Stop kidding yourselves.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Deangelo is gone guys. Stop kidding yourselves.

The issue is really how much dead cap space do we want to accumulate for 2014 when we will be worse off under the cap then we are this year. We could realistically end up with 15 million of the 2014 cap space going to pay for salaries for guys who are long gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Been reading all the comments lately about Stew's re-structure and everyone wanting to cut D-Will. But Williams was our most consistent back, and has been. Stewart has been hurt each of the last couple of seasons and as a feature back can we depend on him to hold up managing the bulk of the carries?

D-Will has always expressed his interest in staying and I don't see why he wouldn't be open to a re-structured deal as well given the signing bonus he received last season...

I'd be curious to know how much cutting Tolbert would free up, in conjunction with a Williams re-structure. As much as I like Tolbert his role was limited until Stew's injury, and I don't think the offense would miss him. Broeckel, or another FA could fill the H-Back role at a cheaper rate.

I just don't think we should split up one of the best rushing tandems if we can work around it, especially witht the commitment we saw to running the ball traditionally the last half of the year. IMO you cannot ignore Williams' production if a re-structure is available.

Just my .02.

I think people need to move on from the Fox era.....and Double Trouble represents all that is the Fox way of life.

What production from Williams are you arguing can't be ignored? What he did years ago? He hasn't done much under Ron Rivera. Sure, he can still pop one if given a nice fat hole but he doesn't fit what they want to do (which is why Ron essentially benched him both seasons in favor of a different style as the main RB).

Cam, Tolbert, and Stewart.....just with those 3. There aren't enough carries for Stewart to earn his paycheck running an offense that maximizes all Newton has to offer.

You want Double Trouble?! You want a QB like Jimmy Clausen then.....then there would be carries to justify their contract.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

i have a wierd feeling dwill will be back

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

With a good OL...

Cam Newton, Mike Tolbert and my grandma could give us a top 5 rush attack overall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

With our offense, its just not practical to have both D'lo and Stewart. You don't maximize their abilities and talents with 4 guys in a backfield the way we are set up. You have to think something will happen to one of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Godda keep Dlow and figure out how to get him in open space to let him do his thing...we need him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites