Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

stirs

Does this guy always get a pass?

52 posts in this topic

This guy is generally given a pass for his words and actions because he is far left in his views. Hey, he hates Bush, so can't be all bad, right?

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/alec_fast_slur_ious_tzxXtwrX49oGHN1VaG08hM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who cares?

Thanks for making my point. Job is done here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who cares?

Thanks for making my point. Job is done here.

It's a c-list celebrity. A nobody.

And it's in the news. Google is your friend. What more do you need? A congressional hearing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean "a pass"? A pass by whom?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally, when someone like a Mel Gibson or someone who might be veiwed more as a right leaner makes a moronic statement, they come out of the woodwork to rightly put him in his place. A little more "kid gloves" for guys like Baldwin who seems to get a pass when slurring because "he is generally on our side"

Huddle goes nuts from Joe Schmoes all over America who do stupid or racist things, but this guy just keeps marching on with little more than, "he is a nobody, so it doesn't matter"

I just like pointing out they hypocisy from time to time. Carry on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The huddle went nuts over Mel Gibson? I don't care about him either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baldwin is also a funny charismatic guy which helps with the pass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so this is what? proof the mainstream lamestream media is in the tank for obummer/lieberals? i don't get the point of this post other than "alec baldwin showed his ass" (which is true).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Same people defending Hillary a few months ago are now drawing the conclusion that Flynn... and by association Trump... must be guilty of something because Flynn is getting immunity from the FBI. Works both ways. For the record... IMHO both Hillary and Trump are crooks.  If justice in this nation were truly blind these two politicians and their henchmen would be doing a long stretch in prison by now.
    • Slot receivers don't exist in 2 TE sets unless we're lining a TE on the outside which I haven't seen much out of the currently constructed Panthers. Maybe McCaffrey if he were to be split out wide but the Panthers usually keep a RB with Cam in-case Cam needs the extra protection and audibles the RB to block.  The Panthers would be best suited pairing KB with a speedster such as Charles Johnson, who's adept at running deep routes. Keep Howard and possible the RB (if not blocking) on short routes, KB on working the intermediate routes, Olsen running intermediate/deep routes, and Johnson running deep routes. That way Cam has a receiver on every level. All of this assumes Shula constructs a properly worked passing attack. 
    • Yes, that is correct. My point being Clinton was impeached and stayed in office. Almost everyone calling for impeachment of Trump thinks it means to remove him from office. He would have to be impeached and then found guilty to do that. The impeachment alone does not remove him. And my original point, no one was bringing up the electoral college back then. It makes no sense. Because the popular would surely rid us of corrupt politicians, right?